Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:35:59.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Infestation of Elm Bark-Beetles (Scolytidæ) by a Nematode, Parasitylenchus scolyti n.sp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

J. N. Oldham
J. N. Oldham
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of the insects responsible directly or indirectly for losses in plant industry the Scolytidæ or bark-beetles are well known, particularly to those associated with the practice of forestry, in Europe and America through the effects of their outbreaks. Bark-beetle attacks have resulted in serious damage in many parts of the world although in Britain their depredations have been less severe probably owing to the limited extent of forest lands.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1930 , pp. 239 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fisher, R. C., 1928.—“The Relation of the Elm Bark-Beetles to their Host Trees,” Forestry, vol. II, No. 1, pp. 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, G., 1914a.—“Tylenchus dispar curvidentis m. und Tylenchus dispar cryphali m.” Zool. Anz., vol. XLV, No. 5, pp. 195–207. (W.L. 23833).Google Scholar
Fuchs, G., 1914b.—“Ueber Parasiten und andere biologisch an die Borkenkäfer gebundene Nematoden,” Verh. Ges. deuts. Naturf. Ärzt., vol. LXXXV, No. 2, Part 1, pp. 688–692. (W.L. 22277.)Google Scholar
Fuchs, G., 1915.—“Die Naturgeschichte der Nematoden und ciniger anderer Parasiten (1) des Ips typographus L. (2) des Hylobius abietis L.,” Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst., vol. XXXVIII, Nos. 3 and 4, pp. 109–222. (W.L. 23831).Google Scholar
Fuchs, G., 1929.—“Die Parasiten einiger Rüssel- und Borkenkäfer,” Z. Parasitenk., vol. II, No. 2, pp. 248–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavalov, I. I., 1926.—“Some injurious Beetles from the Crimea (Col.),” (in Russian). Acta Soc. ent. Stauropol, ii., pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1930a.—“On a Remarkable New Nematode, Tylenchinema oscinellæ gen. et. sp. n., parasitic in the Frit-fly, Oscinella frit L., attacking Oats,” Philos. Trans., Ser. B, vol. 218, pp. 315–343. (W.L. 16192).Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1930b.—“A New Species of the Nematode genus Cylindrogaster,” J. Helm., vol. VIII, No. 2, pp. 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jazentkovsky, A., 1924.—“Kastration der Waldgärtner von Würmern (Nematoden) und ihr Einfluss auf die Lebensfähigkeit der Borkenkäfer, Ipidæ, vorlänfiger bericht,” Mem. Inst. Agronom. d'Etat de la Belrussie, LIV. 3, pp. 278–296 (in Russian with German summary). Abstract in Zbl. Bakt., IIte Abt., vol. LXIX, No. 1–7, pp. 157–158, Nov., 1926. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Micoletzky, H., 1921.—“Die freilebenden Erd-Nematoden,” Arch. Naturgesch., 87 Jahrg., Abt. A, Nos. 8 and 9, p. 545. (W.L. 1782).Google Scholar
Munro, J. W., 1926.—“British Bark-Beetles,” Forestry Commission Bulletin No. 3, pp. 77. London.Google Scholar
Wülker, G., 1929.—“Bemerkungen zur Arbeit von G. Fuchs: “Die Parasiten einiger Russel- und Borkenkäfer,’” Z. Parasitenk, vol. II, No. 2, pp. 286–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaluwenburg, R. H. van, 1928.—“The Interrelationships of Insects and Round-worms,” Bull. H. S. P. A. Expt. Sta., Entom. Ser. No. 20, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar