Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:06:08.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dicrocoelium dendriticum: The Life Cycle in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

D. W. Tarry
D. W. Tarry
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The work has demonstrated that one of the more important areas of Scotland where Dicrocoelium dendriticum is endemic carried infected colonies of Helicella itala which live in association with the ant Formica fusca. Workers of the ant were shown to acquire typical metacercarial cysts after the ingestion of slime balls, and the cysts gave rise to mature lancet flukes in sheep and hamsters, eggs appearing in the faeces after 56 and 48 days respectively. Higher egg counts were obtained from hamsters to which more cysts were administered. This is the first occasion on which an ant intermediate host has been demonstrated for Dicrocoelium in Britain.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 43 , Issue 3-4 , September 1969 , pp. 403 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, D. W., 1950.—“Lancet Fluke (Dicrocoelium dendriticum) infection in New York State.” Cornell Vet., 40, 97–100.Google Scholar
Boulenger, J., Tribouley, J., Amyot, B., and Duret, J., 1965.—“Importance des Léporidés comme réservoirs sauvages dans l'épidémiologie des distomoses á Fasciola hepatica et Dicrocoelium dendriticum.” Annls Parasit. hum. comp., 40, 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M., 1931.—“Experimental infection of sheep with Dicrocoelium dendriticum.” J. Helminth., 9, 41–44.Google Scholar
Groschaft, J., 1961.—[“Ants, the complementary intermediate hosts of Dicrocoelium dendriticum Rudolphi, 1819.”] (In Czech.) Čslká Parasit., 8, 151–165.Google Scholar
Dawes, B., 1956.—The Trematoda: with special reference to British and other European forms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darling, F. F. and Boyd, J. M., 1964.—The Highlands and Islands. Collins, London.Google Scholar
Hendriks, E. M. L. and Pillars, A. W. N., 1921.—“On a further occurrence of the lanceolate fluke (Dicrocoelium dendriticum Rud.) in the liver of a British sheep.” Vet. J., 28, 448–449.Google Scholar
Hohorst, W. and Graefe, , 1961.—“Ameisen-obligatorische Zwischenwirte des Lanzettegels: (Dicrocoelium dendriticum).” Naturwissenschaften, 48, 229–230.Google Scholar
Hohorst, W. and Lammler, , 1962.—“Experimentelle Dicrocoeliose-Studien.” Z. Tropenmed. Parasit., 13, 377–396.Google Scholar
Krull, W. M., 1958.—“The migratory route of the metacercariae of Dicrocoelium dendriticum (Rudolphi, 1819) Looss, 1899 in the definitive host: Dicrocoeliidae.” Cornell Vet., 48, 17–24.Google Scholar
Krull, W. M. and Mapes, C. R., 1952.—“Studies on the biology of Dicrocoelium dendriticum (Rudolphi, 1819) Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Dicrocoeliidae), including its relation to the intermediate host Cionella lubrica (Müller) IV. Infection experiments involving definitive hosts.” Cornell Vet., 42, 277–285.Google Scholar
Mapes, C. R., 1951.—“Studies on the biology of Dicrocoelium dendriticum (Rudolphi, 1819). Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Dicrocoeliidae), including its relationship to the intermediate host, Cionella lubrica (Muller). I. A study of Dicrocoelium dendriticum and Dicrocoelium infection.” Cornell Vet., 41, 382–432.Google Scholar
Mattes, O., 1936.—“Der Entwicklungsgang des Lanzettegels Dicrocoelium lanceatum.” Z. ParasitKde, 8, 371–430.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, W., 1936.—“Untersuchungen über Bau und Entwicklung der Lanzettegel-Cercariae (Cercaris vitrina) und Klarstellung des Infections-vorganges beim Endwirt.” Z. ParasitKde, 8, 431–473.Google Scholar
Nôller, W., 1932.—“Weitere Untersuchen über Parasitenbefunde bei Landschnecken von Thüringer Schafweiden in einem Lanzettegelgebiete.” Sber. Ges. naturf. Freunde, Berl., 3–62.Google Scholar
Pillers, A. W. N., 1919.—“On the occurrence of the lanceolate fluke (Dicrocoelium dendniticum (Rud.) in the liver of a British sheep.” Vet. J., 26, 206–208.Google Scholar
Rowlands, W. T., 1963.—(M.A.F.F., Veterinary Investigation Officer, Bangor Centre, Personal Communication).Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., 1962.—Introduction to Animal Parasitology. London, English University Press.Google Scholar
Swadjyan, P. K., 1955.—[New data on the specific composition of intermediate hosts of the lancet fluke in the Armenian S.S.R., and on the development of the parasite in these organisms]. (In Russian). Izv. Ahad. Nauk. Armyan. SSR. VIII, (Zool)., 12, 69–81.Google Scholar
Vogel, H., and Falcao, J., 1954.—“Uber den Lebenzyklus des Lanzettegels, Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Deutschland.” Z. Tropenmed. Parasit., 5, 275–296.Google Scholar
Yarrow, I. H. H., 1954.—“The British ants allied to Formica Jusca L. (Hym. Formicidae).” Trans. Soc. Br. Ent., 2, 229–244.Google Scholar