Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:29:58.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Life History of the Lungworm, Synthetocaulus abstrusus, hitherto confused with that of Ollulanus tricuspis in Cats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Thomas W. M. Cameron
Affiliation:
Assistant in the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Extract

In 1865, Leuckart described from the stomach of the domestic cat, a minute bursate worm which he named Ollulanus tricuspis. His original description was somewhat scanty, but it was amplified in later years (1867–1876). As this work is scattered throughout many pages, the following is a brief resumé of Leuckart's theory.

He was struck by the fact, that being viviparous in habit, it resembled Trichinella spiralis, but recognised that several fundamental differences existed between them. Ollulanus never produced more than three larvae at a time from relatively large eggs, about 60μ to 120μ long; whereas Trichinella produced numerous larvae with small eggs about 35μ long. He found what he believed were the free larvae of Ollulanus, which measured about 320μ long by 15μ wide, had a truncated oral extremity and a short tail which ended in a short S-shaped tip (Fig. 1, a). The oesophagus was between one third and one half of the total length of the intestine; several transparent vesicles could be seen at its clubshaped posterior extremity. Although there are seldom more than three embryos inside the female, larvae were usually, found in large numbers throughout the whole intestinal tract of the host, as well as encysted (in cysts ·15 to ·2 mm. in diameter) on various internal organs. The cyst wall had a connective tissue-like structure of such thickness that it might be three or four times the diameter of the enclosed space.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, T. W. M., 1923.—“On the morphology of Ollulanus tricusfris Leuckart, 1865, a Nematode Parasite of the Cat.” J. Helminthology, I., pp. 157160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codbold, T. S., 1873.—“The Internal Parasites of our Domesticated Animals, etc.” p. 125.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1875.—“On lung parasites, more especially in relation to Olulanosis of Cats.” Veterinarian, LVIII, pp. 526532.Google Scholar
Galli-VALERIO, B., 1921.—“Parasitologische Untersuchungen und Beitrāge zur parasitologischen Technik.” Centralbl. f. Bakt., etc., I. Abt Orig. Bd. LXXXVI., pp. 346352.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1916.—“Nematode Parasites of Mammals of the Orders Rodentia, etc.” Proc. U.S. Nat. Museum, vol. L., pp. 177178.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R., 1865.—“Bericht fiber die wissenschaftlichen Leistungen in der nat der niederen Thiere.” Arch. fur. Nat., XIII., p. 227.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R., 1867–1876.—“Die Menschlichen Parasiten.” Bd. II., pp. 87–83, 102106, 122.Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G., 1914.—“Parasites et Maladies Parasitaires da Cbien et du Chat,” pp. 270272.Google Scholar
Muller, A., 1890.—“Helmlnthologische Mittheilungen.” Deutsche Zeits.f. Thiermedicin, XVII., pp. 5870.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1895.—“Traité de Zoologie Médicale et Agricole,” pp. 436437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railliet, A., 1898.—“Rectification de la Nomenclature d'aprés les travaux récents.” Rec. de méd. vét., vol. LXXIV., pp. 173.Google Scholar
Railliet, A., and Henry, A., 1907.—“Sur les variations des strongyles de l'appariel respiratoire des mammiferes.” Compt. rend. Soc. de Biol. vol. LXIII. p. 753.Google Scholar