Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:45:13.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Pillars at the South Gate of Troy VI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 JHS. 1933, 298Google Scholar.

2 The pillars should not be called ‘baetyls,’ a name applicable only to aerolites and prehistoric stone implements believed to be thunder-bolts (Moore, George F., Baetylia, in AJA. VII. [1903], 198 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar, who maintains (205, note 1)that the whole matter was correctly stated by Falconnet in 1722: I owe this reference to Mr. F. N. Pryce, and information on the question to Mr. G. A. Wainwright).

3 Heinze, R., Virgils epische Technik3 (Leipzig and Berlin, 1915/1928), 20 note 1Google Scholar.

4 This circumstance may explain how (as I try to shew in a forthcoming article in Folk-Lore) certain myths became attached to stories of Troy, mainly because they expressed—originally for quite different purposes—the fundamental ideas of exclusion and difficult entrance.

5 The notion of magical defence at Troy is paralleled in Egypt, where it sometimes controlled architectural plans (Drioton, G. E. in Bull, de l'Ethnog., XXII. [1931], 1 ff.Google Scholar). A similar intention belongs to Greek propylaics (Casson, , Macedonia, 235, 251 fGoogle Scholar.)