Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:57:20.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulent mixing due to the Holmboe wave instability at high Reynolds number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Hesam Salehipour Open the ORCID record for Hesam Salehipour [Opens in a new window] ,
C. P. Caulfield  and
W. R. Peltier
Hesam Salehipour*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada
C. P. Caulfield
Affiliation:
BP Institute, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
W. R. Peltier
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider numerically the transition to turbulence and associated mixing in stratified shear flows with initial velocity distribution $\overline{U}(z,0)\,\boldsymbol{e}_{x}=U_{0}\,\boldsymbol{e}_{x}\tanh (z/d)$ and initial density distribution $\overline{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}(z,0)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}[1-\tanh (z/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})]$ away from a hydrostatic reference state $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{r}\gg \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}$. When the ratio $R=d/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}$ of the characteristic length scales over which the velocity and density vary is equal to one, this flow is primarily susceptible to the classic well-known Kelvin–Helmholtz instability (KHI). This instability, which typically manifests at finite amplitude as an array of elliptical vortices, strongly ‘overturns’ the density interface of strong initial gradient, which nevertheless is the location of minimum initial gradient Richardson number $Ri_{g}(0)=Ri_{b}=g\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{0}d/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{r}U_{0}^{2}$, where $Ri_{g}(z)=-([g/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{r}]\,\text{d}\overline{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}}/\text{d}z)/(\text{d}\overline{U}/\text{d}z)^{2}$ and $Ri_{b}$ is a bulk Richardson number. As is well known, at sufficiently high Reynolds numbers ($Re$), the primary KHI induces a vigorous but inherently transient burst of turbulence and associated irreversible mixing localised in the vicinity of the density interface, leading to a relatively well-mixed region bounded by stronger density gradients above and below. We explore the qualitatively different behaviour that arises when $R\gg 1$, and so the density interface is sharp, with $Ri_{g}(z)$ now being maximum at the density interface $Ri_{g}(0)=RRi_{b}$. This flow is primarily susceptible to Holmboe wave instability (HWI) (Holmboe, Geophys. Publ., vol. 24, 1962, pp. 67–113), which manifests at finite amplitude in this symmetric flow as counter-propagating trains of elliptical vortices above and below the density interface, thus perturbing the interface so as to exhibit characteristically cusped interfacial waves which thereby ‘scour’ the density interface. Unlike previous lower-$Re$ experimental and numerical studies, when $Re$ is sufficiently high the primary HWI becomes increasingly more three-dimensional due to the emergence of shear-aligned secondary convective instabilities. As $Re$ increases, (i) the growth rate of secondary instabilities appears to saturate and (ii) the perturbation kinetic energy exhibits a $k^{-5/3}$ spectrum for sufficiently large length scales that are influenced by anisotropic buoyancy effects. Therefore, at sufficiently high $Re$, vigorous turbulence is triggered that also significantly ‘scours’ the primary density interface, leading to substantial irreversible mixing and vertical transport of mass above and below the (robust) primary density interface. Furthermore, HWI produces a markedly more long-lived turbulence event compared to KHI at a similarly high $Re$. Despite their vastly different mechanics (i.e. ‘overturning’ versus ‘scouring’) and localisation, the mixing induced by KHI and HWI is comparable in both absolute terms and relative efficiency. Our results establish that, provided the flow Reynolds number is sufficiently high, shear layers with sharp density interfaces and associated locally high values of the gradient Richardson number may still be sites of substantial and efficient irreversible mixing.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Stratified turbulence Waves/Free-surface Flows: Wave breaking
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 803 , 25 September 2016 , pp. 591 - 621
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexakis, A. 2005 On Holmboe’s instability for smooth shear and density profiles. Phys. Fluids 17 (8), 084103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arratia, C., Caulfield, C. P. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2013 Transient perturbation growth in time-dependent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 717, 90–133.Google Scholar
Augier, P., Chomaz, J.-M. & Billant, P. 2012 Spectral analysis of the transition to turbulence from a dipole in stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 713, 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartello, P. & Tobias, S. M. 2013 Sensitivity of stratified turbulence to the buoyancy Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 725, 1–22.Google Scholar
Billant, P. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2001 Self-similarity of strongly stratified inviscid flows. Phys. Fluids 13 (6), 1645–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Billant, P., Lindborg, E. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2007 Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 343–368.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. R., Lawrence, G. A. & Smyth, W. D. 2007 Evolution and mixing of asymmetric Holmboe instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 582, 103–132.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. R., Tedford, E. W., Rahmani, M. & Lawrence, G. A. 2010 Holmboe wave fields in simulation and experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 648, 205–223.Google Scholar
Caulfield, C. P. 1994 Multiple linear instability of a layered stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 155–285.Google Scholar
Caulfield, C. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1994 Three-dimensionalization of the stratified mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 6, 3803–3805.Google Scholar
Caulfield, C. P. & Peltier, W. R. 2000 The anatomy of the mixing transition in homogeneous and stratified free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 413, 1–47.Google Scholar
Dimotakis, P. E. 2005 Turbulent mixing. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 329–356.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. F. 1997 An overlapping Schwarz method for spectral element solution of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 133 (1), 84–101.Google Scholar
Green, D. A. 2011 A colour scheme for the display of astronomical intensity images. Bull. Astron. Soc. India 39, 289–295.Google Scholar
Hogg, A. McC. & Ivey, G. N. 2003 The Kelvin–Helmholtz to Holmboe instability transition in stratified exchange flows. J. Fluid Mech. 477, 339–362.Google Scholar
Holmboe, J. 1962 On the behaviour of symmetric waves in stratified shear layers. Geophys. Publ. 24, 67–113.Google Scholar
Ivey, G. N., Winters, K. B. & Koseff, J. R. 2008 Density stratification, turbulence, but how much mixing? Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40 (1), 169–184.Google Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1985 The onset of turbulence in finite amplitude Kelvin–Helmholtz billows. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1989 The role of transverse secondary instabilities in the evolution of free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 202, 367–402.Google Scholar
Laval, J.-P., McWilliams, J. C. & Dubrulle, B. 2003 Forced stratified turbulence: successive transitions with Reynolds number. Phys. Rev. E 68 (3), 036308.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1983 Stratified turbulence and the mesoscale variability of the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 40 (3), 749–761.Google Scholar
Lindborg, E. 2006 The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 207–242.Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. 1955 Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation. Tellus 7, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchini, P. & Bottaro, A. 2014 Adjoint equations in stability analysis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46 (1), 493.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A., Caulfield, C. P. & Peltier, W. R. 2013 Time-dependent, non-monotonic mixing in stratified turbulent shear flows: implications for oceanographic estimates of buoyancy flux. J. Fluid Mech. 736, 570–593.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2012 The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 1. Shear aligned convection, pairing, and braid instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 5–44.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2013 Shear induced mixing in geophysical flows: does the route to turbulence matter to its efficiency? J. Fluid Mech. 725, 216–261.Google Scholar
Meyer, C. R. & Linden, P. F. 2014 Stratified shear flow: experiments in an inclined duct. J. Fluid Mech. 753, 242–253.Google Scholar
Nastrom, G. D. & Gage, K. S. 1985 A climatology of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature observed by commercial aircraft. J. Atmos. Sci. 42 (9), 950–960.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, T. R. 1980 Estimates of the local rate of vertical diffusion from dissipation measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 83–89.Google Scholar
Osborn, T. R. & Cox, C. S. 1972 Oceanic fine structure. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 3 (1), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, W. R. & Caulfield, C. P. 2003 Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. J. & de Bruyn Kops, S. M. 2003 Dynamics of turbulence strongly influenced by buoyancy. Phys. Fluids 15, 2047–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. J. & Lindborg, E. 2008 Stratified turbulence: a possible interpretation of some geophysical turbulence measurements. J. Atmos. Sci. 65 (7), 2416–2424.Google Scholar
Salehipour, H. & Peltier, W. R. 2015 Diapycnal diffusivity, turbulent Prandtl number and mixing efficiency in Boussinesq stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 775, 464–500.Google Scholar
Salehipour, H., Peltier, W. R. & Mashayek, A. 2015 Turbulent diapycnal mixing in stratified shear flows: the influence of Prandtl number on mixing efficiency and transition at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 773, 178–223.Google Scholar
Salehipour, H., Peltier, W. R., Whalen, C. B. & MacKinnon, J. A. 2016 A new characterization of the turbulent diapycnal diffusivities of mass and momentum in the ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3370–3379.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. 2006 Secondary circulations in Holmboe waves. Phys. Fluids 18 (6), 064104.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D., Carpenter, J. R. & Lawrence, G. A. 2007 Mixing in symmetric Holmboe waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 37, 1566–1583.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D., Klaassen, G. P. & Peltier, W. R. 1988 Finite amplitude Holmboe waves. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 43 (2), 181–222.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Moum, J. N. 2000 Length scales of turbulence in stably stratified mixing layers. Phys. Fluids 12, 1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Peltier, W. R. 1989 The transition between Kelvin–Helmholtz and Holmboe instability: an investigation of the overreflection hypothesis. J. Atmos. Sci. 46 (24), 3698–3720.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Peltier, W. R. 1991 Instability and transition in finite amplitude Kelvin–Helmholtz and Holmboe waves. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 387–415.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. D. & Winters, K. B. 2003 Turbulence and mixing in Holmboe waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 33, 694–711.Google Scholar
Strang, E. J. & Fernando, H. J. S. 2001 Entrainment and mixing in stratified shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 349–386.Google Scholar
Tedford, E. W., Pieters, R. & Lawrence, G. A. 2009 Symmetric Holmboe instabilities in a laboratory exchange flow. J. Fluid Mech. 636, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, M. L. & Bartello, P. 2004 Stratified turbulence dominated by vortical motion. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 281–308.Google Scholar
Westerweel, J., Fukushima, C., Pedersen, J. M. & Hunt, J. C. R. 2005 Mechanics of the turbulent–nonturbulent interface of a jet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 174501.Google Scholar
Winters, K. B. & D’Asaro, E. A. 1996 Diascalar flux and the rate of fluid mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 317, 179–193.Google Scholar
Winters, K. B., Lombard, P. N., Riley, J. J. & D’Asaro, E. A. 1995 Available potential energy and mixing in density-stratified fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 115–128.Google Scholar
Woods, A. W., Caulfield, C. P., Landel, J. R. & Kuesters, A. 2010 Non-invasive turbulent mixing across a density interface in a turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 347–357.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. Z. & Lawrence, G. A. 2001 Holmboe’s instability in exchange flows. J. Fluid Mech. 429, 391–409.Google Scholar