Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T00:45:24.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistics of turbulence in the energy-containing range of Taylor–Couette compared to canonical wall-bounded flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

Dominik Krug Open the ORCID record for Dominik Krug [Opens in a new window] ,
Xiang I. A. Yang Open the ORCID record for Xiang I. A. Yang [Opens in a new window] ,
Charitha M. de Silva Open the ORCID record for Charitha M. de Silva [Opens in a new window] ,
Rodolfo Ostilla-Mónico ,
Roberto Verzicco Open the ORCID record for Roberto Verzicco [Opens in a new window] ,
Ivan Marusic  and
Detlef Lohse Open the ORCID record for Detlef Lohse [Opens in a new window]
Dominik Krug*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Xiang I. A. Yang
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Charitha M. de Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Rodolfo Ostilla-Mónico
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Kavli Institute for Bionano Science and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kohn Hall, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030, USA
Roberto Verzicco
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Via del Politecnico 1, Roma 00133, Italy Physics of Fluids Group and Twente Max Planck Center, Department of Science and Technology, Mesa+ Institute, and J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Ivan Marusic
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Detlef Lohse
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group and Twente Max Planck Center, Department of Science and Technology, Mesa+ Institute, and J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Considering structure functions of the streamwise velocity component in a framework akin to the extended self-similarity hypothesis (ESS), de Silva et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 823, 2017, pp. 498–510) observed that remarkably the large-scale (energy-containing range) statistics in canonical wall-bounded flows exhibit universal behaviour. In the present study, we extend this universality, which was seen to encompass also flows at moderate Reynolds number, to Taylor–Couette flow. In doing so, we find that also the transversal structure function of the spanwise velocity component exhibits the same universal behaviour across all flow types considered. We further demonstrate that these observations are consistent with predictions developed based on an attached-eddy hypothesis. These considerations also yield a possible explanation for the efficacy of the ESS framework by showing that it relaxes the self-similarity assumption for the attached-eddy contributions. By taking the effect of streamwise alignment into account, the attached-eddy model predicts different behaviour for structure functions in the streamwise and in the spanwise directions and that this effect cancels in the ESS framework – both consistent with the data. Moreover, it is demonstrated here that also the additive constants, which were previously believed to be flow dependent, are indeed universal at least in turbulent boundary layers and pipe flow where high Reynolds number data are currently available.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Rotating turbulence Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 830 , 10 November 2017 , pp. 797 - 819
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselmet, F., Gagne, Y., Hopfinger, E. J. & Antonia, R. A. 1984 High-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63–89.Google Scholar
Arneodo, A., Baudet, C., Belin, F., Benzi, R., Castaing, B., Chabaud, B., Chavarria, R., Ciliberto, S., Camussi, R., Chilla, F. et al. 1996 Structure functions in turbulence, in various flow configurations, at Reynolds number between 30 and 5000, using extended self-similarity. Europhys. Lett. 34, 411.Google Scholar
Belin, F., Tabeling, P. & Willaime, H. 1996 Exponents of the structure function in a low temperature helium experiment. Physica D 93, 52.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Ciliberto, S., Baudet, C. & Chavarria, G. R. 1995 On the scaling of three-dimensional homogeneous and isotropic turbulence. Physica D 80 (4), 385–398.Google Scholar
Benzi, R., Ciliberto, S., Tripiccione, R., Baudet, C., Massaioli, F. & Succi, S. 1993 Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. E 48 (1), R29–R32.Google ScholarPubMed
Brauckmann, H. J. & Eckhardt, B. 2013 Direct numerical simulations of local and global torque in Taylor–Couette flow up to Re = 30 000. J. Fluid Mech. 718, 398–427.Google Scholar
Chandran, D., Baidya, R., Monty, J. P. & Marusic, I. 2017 Two-dimensional energy spectra in high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 826, R1.Google Scholar
Chung, D., Marusic, I., Monty, J. P., Vallikivi, M. & Smits, A. J. 2015 On the universality of inertial energy in the log layer of turbulent boundary layer and pipe flows. Exp. Fluids 56 (7), 141.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. A. 2004 Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. A., Krogstad, P. A. & Nickels, T. B. 2006a A refined interpretation of the logarithmic structure function law in wall layer turbulence. Phys. Fluids 18 (6), 065112.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. A., Nickels, T. B. & Krogstad, P.-Å. 2006b The logarithmic structure function law in wall-layer turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Alamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R.D 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135–144.Google Scholar
Fardin, M. A., Perge, C. & Taberlet, N. 2014 ‘The hydrogen atom of fluid dynamics’–introduction to the Taylor–Couette flow for soft matter scientists. Soft Matt. 10 (20), 3523–3535.Google Scholar
Frisch, U. 1995 Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2011 Multiple scaling in the ultimate regime of thermal convection. Phys. Fluids 23 (4), 045108.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2016 High-Reynolds number Taylor–Couette turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 53–80.Google Scholar
Huisman, S. G., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2013a Statistics of turbulent fluctuations in counter-rotating Taylor–Couette flows. Phys. Rev. E 88 (6), 063001.Google ScholarPubMed
Huisman, S. G., Scharnowski, S., Cierpka, C., Kähler, C. J, Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2013b Logarithmic boundary layers in strong Taylor–Couette turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (26), 264501.Google Scholar
Huisman, S.G, Van Der Veen, R. C., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2014 Multiple states in highly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. Nature Commun. 5, 3820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2012 Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (9), 094501.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1–28.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N., Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. S. 2009 Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103–136.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. 1998 Turbulent velocity fluctuations need not be Gaussian. J. Fluid Mech. 376, 139–147.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941 The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30 (4), 301–305.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1962 A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 13 (01), 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. & Moser, R. D. 2015 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Re 𝜏 ≈ 5200. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 395–415.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., Mckeon, B. J., Monkewitz, P. A., Nagib, H. M., Smits, A. J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2010 Wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers: recent advances and key issues. Phys. Fluids 22 (6), 065103.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J. P., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Marusic, I. 2013 Generalized logarithmic law for high-order moments in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 719, R1.Google Scholar
Nagib, H. M. & Chauhan, K. A. 2008 Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows. Phys. Fluids 20 (10), 1518.Google Scholar
Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I., Hafez, S. & Chong, M. S. 2005 Evidence of the k -1 law in a high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer. Phy. Rev. Lett. 95 (7), 074501.Google Scholar
Ostilla-Mónico, R., Lohse, D. & Verzicco, R. 2016a Effect of roll number on the statistics of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1 (5), 054402.Google Scholar
Ostilla-Mónico, R., van der Poel, E. P., Verzicco, R., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2014 Exploring the phase diagram of fully turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 761, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostilla-Mónico, R., Verzicco, R., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2016b The near-wall region of highly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 788, 95–117.Google Scholar
Ostilla-Mónico, R., Verzicco, R. & Lohse, D. 2015 Effects of the computational domain size on direct numerical simulations of Taylor–Couette turbulence with stationary outer cylinder. Phys. Fluids 27, 025110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. & Chong, M. S. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163–199.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Marusic, I. 1995 A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. Part 1. Extension of the attached eddy hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 361–388.Google Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. & Bernardini, M. 2013 Probing high-Reynolds-number effects in numerical boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 25 (2), 021704.Google Scholar
Sillero, J. A., Jiménez, J. & Moser, R. D. 2013 One-point statistics for turbulent wall-bounded flows at Reynolds numbers up to 𝛿+ ≈ 2000. Phys. Fluids 25 (10), 105102.Google Scholar
de Silva, C. M., Marusic, I., Woodcock, J. D. & Meneveau, C. 2015 Scaling of second-and higher-order structure functions in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 769, 654–686.Google Scholar
de Silva, C. M., Krug, D., Lohse, D. & Marusic, I. 2017 Universality of the energy-containing structures in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 823, 498–510.Google Scholar
Smits, A. J., Monty, J., Hultmark, M., Bailey, S. C. C., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2011 Spatial resolution correction for wall-bounded turbulence measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 676, 41–53.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. J. A. M., Wilczek, M. & Meneveau, C. 2014 Large-eddy simulation study of the logarithmic law for second-and higher-order moments in turbulent wall-bounded flow. J. Fluid Mech. 757, 888–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talluru, K. M., Baidya, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2014 Amplitude modulation of all three velocity components in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 746, R1.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1923 Experiments on the motion of solid bodies in rotating fluids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 104, 213–218.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2003 Spanwise structure and scale growth in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 37–74.Google Scholar
Toschi, F., Amati, G., Succi, S., Benzi, R. & Piva, R. 1999 Intermittency and structure functions in channel flow turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (25), 5044.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vallikivi, M., Hultmark, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2011 Turbulence measurements in pipe flow using a nano-scale thermal anemometry probe. Exp. Fluids 51 (6), 1521–1527.Google Scholar
Woodcock, J. D. & Marusic, I. 2015 The statistical behaviour of attached eddies. Phys. Fluids 27 (1), 015104.Google Scholar
Yang, X. I. A., Marusic, I. & Meneveau, C. 2016a Moment generating functions and scaling laws in the inertial layer of turbulent wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 791, R2.Google Scholar
Yang, X. I. A., Meneveau, C., Marusic, I. & Biferale, L. 2016b Extended self-similarity in moment-generating-functions in wall-bounded turbulence at high Reynolds number. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1 (4), 044405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar