Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:39:30.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A parabolic equation for the combined refraction–diffraction of Stokes waves by mildly varying topography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

James T. Kirby
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711 Present address: Marine Sciences Research Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Robert A. Dalrymple
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711

Abstract

A parabolic equation governing the leading-order amplitude for a forward-scattered Stokes wave is derived using a multiple-scale perturbation method, and the connection between the linearized version and a previously derived approximation of the linear mild slope equation is investigated. Two examples are studied numerically for the situation where linear refraction theory leads to caustics, and the nonlinear model is shown to predict the development of wave-jump conditions and significant reductions in amplitude in the vicinity of caustics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1983 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B. & Feir, J. E. 1967 The disintegration of wave trains on deep water. Part 1. Theory J. Fluid Mech. 27, 417430.Google Scholar
Berkhoff, J. C. W. 1972 Computation of combined refraction-diffraction. In Proc. 13th Intl Conf. Coastal Engng, Vancouver.
Berkhoff, J. C. W., Booij, N. & Radder, A. C. 1982 Verification of numerical wave propagation models for simple harmonic linear water waves Coastal Engng 6, 255279.Google Scholar
Chu, V. H. & Mei, C. C. 1970 On slowly-varying Stokes waves. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 873810.
Corones, J. 1975 Bremmer series that correct parabolic approximations J. Math. Anal. Applic. 50, 361372.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. & Mei, C. C. 1976 Water motion on a beach in the presence of a breakwater. 1. Waves J. Geophys. Res. 81, 30793094.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. & Tsay, T.-K. 1983a On weak reflection of water waves J. Fluid Mech. 131, 5971.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. & Tsay, T.-K. 1983b Refraction—diffraction model for weakly nonlinear water waves. Unpublished manuscript.
Lozano, C. & Liu, P. L.-F. 1980 Refraction—diffraction model for linear surface waves J. Fluid Mech. 101, 705720.Google Scholar
Mcdaniel, S. T. 1975 Parabolic approximations for underwater sound propagation J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 11781185.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. & Tuck, E. O. 1980 Forward scattering by long thin bodies SIAM J. Appl. Maths 39, 178191.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. E. 1979 Theory of water-wave refraction Adv. Appl. Mech. 19, 53141.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1978 On the second Painlevé transcendent. Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 361, 277291.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1983 Wave jumps and caustics in the propagation of finite-amplitude water waves J. Fluid Mech. 136, 435452.Google Scholar
Radder, A. C. 1979 On the parabolic equation method for water-wave propagation J. Fluid Mech. 95, 159176.Google Scholar
Tsay, T.-K. & Liu, P. L.-F. 1982 Numerical solutions of water-wave refraction and diffraction problems in the parabolic approximation J. Geophys. Res. 87, 79327940.Google Scholar
Whalin, R. W. 1971 The limit of applicability of linear wave refraction theory in a convergence zone. R.R.H-71-3, U.S. Army Corps of Engrs, WES, Vicksburg.
Wiegel, R. L. 1964 Water wave equivalent of Mach-reflection. In Proc. 9th Intl Conf. Coastal Engng, 82810, Lisbon.
Yue, D. K.-P. 1980 Numerical study of Stokes wave diffraction at grazing incidence. Sc.D. dissertation, MIT.
Yue, D. K.-P. & Mei, C. C. 1980 Forward diffraction of Stokes waves by a thin wedge J. Fluid Mech. 99, 3352.Google Scholar