Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:41:00.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the roles of chord-wise flexibility in a flapping wing with hovering kinematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2010

JEFF D. ELDREDGE ,
JONATHAN TOOMEY  and
ALBERT MEDINA
JEFF D. ELDREDGE*
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1597, USA
JONATHAN TOOMEY
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1597, USA
ALBERT MEDINA
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1597, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aerodynamic performance of a flapping two-dimensional wing section with simplified chord-wise flexibility is studied computationally. Bending stiffness is modelled by a torsion spring connecting two or three rigid components. The leading portion of the wing is prescribed with kinematics that are characteristic of biological hovering, and the aft portion responds passively. Coupled simulations of the Navier–Stokes equations and the wing dynamics are conducted for a wide variety of spring stiffnesses and kinematic parameters. Performance is assessed by comparison of the mean lift, power consumption and lift per unit power, with those from an equivalent rigid wing, and two cases are explored in greater detail through force histories and vorticity snapshots. From the parametric survey, four notable mechanisms are identified through which flexible wings behave differently from rigid counterparts. Rigid wings consistently require more power than their flexible counterparts to generate the same kinematics, as passive deflection leads to smaller drag and torque penalties. Aerodynamic performance is degraded in very flexible wings undergoing large heaving excursions, caused by a premature detachment of the leading-edge vortex. However, a mildly flexible wing has consistently good performance over a wide range of phase differences between pitching and heaving – in contrast to the relative sensitivity of a rigid wing to this parameter – due to better accommodation of the shed leading-edge vortex into the wake during the return stroke, and less tendency to interact with previously shed trailing-edge vortices. Furthermore, a flexible wing permits lift generation even when the leading portion remains nearly vertical, as the wing passively deflects to create an effectively smaller angle of attack, similar to the passive pitching mechanism recently identified for rigid wings. It is found that an effective pitch angle can be defined that accounts for wing deflection to align the results with those of the equivalent rigid wing.

JFM classification

Biological Fluid Dynamics: Swimming/flying Vortex Flows: Vortex shedding
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 659 , 25 September 2010 , pp. 94 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

van den Berg, C. & Ellington, C. P. 1997 The three-dimensional leading-edge vortex of a ‘hovering’ model hawkmoth. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergou, A. J., Xu, S. & Wang, Z. J. 2007 Passive wing pitch reversal in insect flight. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunton, S. L., Rowley, C. W., Taira, K., Colonius, T., Collins, J. & Williams, D. R. 2008 Unsteady aerodynamic forces on small-scale wings: experiments, simulations and models. AIAA Paper 2008-0520.Google Scholar
Combes, S. A. & Daniel, T. L. 2003 Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 2999–3006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O. & Sane, S. P. 1999 Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 1954–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudley, R. 2000 The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function and Evolution. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, J. D. 2007 Numerical simulation of the fluid dynamics of 2D rigid body motion with the vortex particle method. J. Comput. Phys. 221, 626–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, J. D. 2008 Dynamically coupled fluid–body interactions in vorticity-based numerical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 9170–9194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellington, C. P. 1984 The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. 3. Kinematics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 41–78.Google Scholar
Maxworthy, T. 1979 Experiments on the Weis–Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’. J. Fluid Mech. 93, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelin, S., Llewelyn Smith, S. G. & Glover, B. J. 2008 Vortex shedding model of a flapping flag. J. Fluid Mech. 617, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomey, J. 2009 Numerical and experimental studies of flexibility in flapping wing aerodynamics. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Toomey, J. & Eldredge, J. D. 2008 Numerical and experimental study of the fluid dynamics of a flapping wing with low order flexibility. Phys. Fluids 20, 073603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, N., Zhang, J. & Childress, S. 2004 Symmetry breaking leads to forward flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 506, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanella, M., Fitzgerald, T., Preidikman, S., Balaras, E. & Balachandran, B. 2009 Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z. J. 2000 Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. J. 2005 Dissecting insect flight. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. J., Birch, J. M. & Dickinson, M. H. 2004 Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs. robotic wing experiments. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed