Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:35:56.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The laminar boundary layer on a flat plate in periodic sideslip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

L. Bernstein
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen Mary College, University of London. Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
M. S. Ishaq
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen Mary College, University of London. Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK

Abstract

A theoretical study has been made of the laminar boundary layer on a semi-infinite flat plate parallel to a stream consisting of a uniform steady component U normal to its leading edge and a periodic sideslip component of the travelling-wave type, where the wave travels with velocity Q in the direction of the steady component. It is found that the longitudinal flow (that in planes perpendicular to the leading edge) is independent of the transverse flow, and satisfies the well-known Blasius equations. The transverse flow is governed by a linear partial differential equation which may be approximated in different ways for high and low values of the ‘reduced’ frequency $\overline{\omega}$. A series-expansion solution for small $\overline{\omega}$ appears to be valid up to about $\overline{\omega} = 2$; the solution for large $\overline{\omega}$ is applicable down to $\overline{\omega} \approx 10$. A third approximation has been developed which joins the others smoothly. Numerical solutions of the equations for the transverse flow are presented for $0 \leqslant\overline{\omega}\leqslant 40$ and Q/U = 0.6 (the value appropriate to the Queen Mary College (QMC) ‘gust-tunnels’) and for $\overline{\omega} = 10$ and 0.4 [les ] Q/U [les ] ∞. The value of Q/U has a profound influence: for values less than about one there are large phase lags within the boundary layer; for large values there are phase leads throughout most of the layer. For Q/U < 1 the amplitude of the oscillation within the boundary layer exceeds that of the external driving oscillation, this ‘overshoot’ increasing as the wave-speed ratio diminishes. At Q/U = 0.6 peak velocities more than 3 times those outside appear within the viscous layer.

As $\overline{\omega} \rightarrow \infty $, the transverse viscous layer becomes thinner; the oscillatory boundary layer, here transverse, becomes a ‘Stokes layer’ and is virtually uncoupled from the longitudinal flow. Far downstream the amplitude of the transverse skin-friction grows as x½ and becomes comparable with the streamwise component even for moderate values of the sideslip amplitude.

Experiments were conducted in one of the QMC gust-tunnels for values of $\overline{\omega}$ up to 2.0. Measurements of the transverse velocity amplitude and phase profiles confirm the ‘low frequency theory’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Ackerberg, R. C. & Phillips, J. H. 1972 The unsteady laminar boundary layer on a semi-infinite flap plate due to small fluctuations in the magnitude of the free stream velocity. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 137157.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. 1984 On the laminar boundary layer on a flat plate in periodic sideslip. Queen Mary College EP-1062.
Farn, C. L. S. & Arpaci, V. S. 1965 On the numerical solution of unsteady laminar boundary layers. AIAA J. 4, 730732.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. 1961 Contribution à l'étude de la couche limite laminaire instationnaire. Pub. Sci. et Tech. du Min. del' Air, no. 381.Google Scholar
Hill, P. G. & Stenning, A. H. 1960 Laminar boundary layers in oscillatory flow. Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 82, 593608Google Scholar
Ishaq, M. S. 1984 An investigation of some flows in an oscillatory flow wind tunnel. M. Phil. thesis, University of London.
Lam, C. Y. 1983 Unsteady laminar and turbulent boundary layer computations using a differential-difference method. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Lighthill, M. J. 1954 The response of laminar skin-friction and heat transfer to fluctuations in the stream velocity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A224, 123.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. 1957 Motion in the boundary layer with a rapidly oscillating external flow. Proc. 9th Intl Cong. Appl. Mech., Brussels, pp. 155–167.Google Scholar
Moore, F. K. 1957 Aerodynamic effects of boundary layer unsteadiness. VIth Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference. Folkestone. R.Ae.S.
Nickerson, R. J. 1957 The effect of free stream oscillations on the laminar boundary layer on a flat plate. Sc.D. thesis, M.I.T.
Patel, M. H. 1975 On laminar boundary layers in oscillatory flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A347, 99123.Google Scholar
Patel, M. H. 1977 On turbulent boundary layers in oscillatory flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A353, 121144.Google Scholar
Patel, M. H. & Hancock, G. J. 1976 A gust-tunnel facility. Aero. Res. Counc. R & M 3802. HMSO.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. 1972 Two-dimensional boundary layers in a free stream which oscillates without reversing. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 359383.Google Scholar
Rott, N. & Rosenzweig, M. L. 1960 On the response of the laminar boundary layer to small fluctuations of the free-stream velocity. J. Aerospace Sci. 27, 741747.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Stewartson, K. 1960 The theory of unsteady laminar boundary layers. Adv. Appl. Mech. 6, 137.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. G. 1851 On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 9, 8106.Google Scholar
Teipel, I. 1970 Calculation of unsteady laminar boundary layers by an integral method. Z. Flugwiss. 18, 5865.Google Scholar
Telionis, D. 1981 Unsteady Viscous Flows. Springer.
Wuest, W. 1952 Grenzschichten an zylindrischen Korpen mit nichtstationarer Querbewegung. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 32, 172178.Google Scholar