Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:00:58.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sheet-like and plume-like thermal flow in a spherical convection experiment performed under microgravity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2013

B. Futterer ,
A. Krebs ,
A.-C. Plesa ,
F. Zaussinger ,
R. Hollerbach ,
D. Breuer  and
C. Egbers
B. Futterer*
Affiliation:
Chair of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus, Germany Institute of Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 18, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
A. Krebs
Affiliation:
Chair of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
A.-C. Plesa
Affiliation:
Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany
F. Zaussinger
Affiliation:
Chair of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
R. Hollerbach
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Earth and Planetary Magnetism Group, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
D. Breuer
Affiliation:
Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany
C. Egbers
Affiliation:
Chair of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Siemens-Halske-Ring 14, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We introduce, in spherical geometry, experiments on electro-hydrodynamic driven Rayleigh–Bénard convection that have been performed for both temperature-independent (‘GeoFlow I’) and temperature-dependent fluid viscosity properties (‘GeoFlow II’) with a measured viscosity contrast up to 1.5. To set up a self-gravitating force field, we use a high-voltage potential between the inner and outer boundaries and a dielectric insulating liquid; the experiments were performed under microgravity conditions on the International Space Station. We further run numerical simulations in three-dimensional spherical geometry to reproduce the results obtained in the ‘GeoFlow’ experiments. We use Wollaston prism shearing interferometry for flow visualization – an optical method producing fringe pattern images. The flow patterns differ between our two experiments. In ‘GeoFlow I’, we see a sheet-like thermal flow. In this case convection patterns have been successfully reproduced by three-dimensional numerical simulations using two different and independently developed codes. In contrast, in ‘GeoFlow II’, we obtain plume-like structures. Interestingly, numerical simulations do not yield this type of solution for the low viscosity contrast realized in the experiment. However, using a viscosity contrast of two orders of magnitude or higher, we can reproduce the patterns obtained in the ‘GeoFlow II’ experiment, from which we conclude that nonlinear effects shift the effective viscosity ratio.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Geophysical and Geological Flows Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 735 , 25 November 2013 , pp. 647 - 683
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Androvandi, S., Davaille, A., Limarea, A., Foucquiera, A. & Marais, C. 2011 At least three scales of convection in a mantle with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 188, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahloul, A., Mutabazi, I. & Ambari, A. 2000 Codimension 2 points in the flow inside a cylindrical annulus with a radial temperature gradient. Eur. Phys. J., Appl. Phys. 9, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgardner, J. P. 1985 Three-dimensional treatment of convective flow in the Earth’s mantle. J. Stat. Phys. 39, 501–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer Leverkusen (now GE Bayer Silicones Germany). 2002 Bayer Silicones: Baysilone Fluids M. Technical Data Sheet, 11.11.2002 (delivered with the liquids).Google Scholar
Bercovici, D., Schubert, G. & Glatzmaier, G. A. 1989a Three-dimensional spherical models of convection in the Earth’s mantle. Science 244, 950–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bercovici, D., Schubert, G. & Glatzmaier, G. A. 1991 Modal growth and coupling in three-dimensional spherical convection. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 61, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovici, D., Schubert, G. & Glatzmaier, G. A. 1992 Three-dimensional convection of an infinite-Prandtl-number compressible fluid in a basally heated spherical shell. J. Fluid Mech. 239, 683–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercovici, D., Schubert, G., Glatzmaier, G. A. & Zebib, A. 1989b Three-dimensional thermal convection in a spherical shell. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booker, J. R. 1976 Thermal convection with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, M., Wessling, S., Schmalzl, J. & Hansen, U. 2004 Effects of inertia in Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. E 69, 026302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busse, F. H. 1975 Patterns of convection in spherical shells. J. Fluid Mech. 72, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, F. H. 1978 Non-linear properties of thermal convection. Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1930–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, F. H. 2002 Convective flows in rapidly rotating spheres and their dynamo action. Phys. Fluids 14, 1301–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, F. H. & Frick, H. 1985 Square-pattern convection in fluids with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busse, F. H. & Riahi, N. 1982 Patterns of convection in spherical shells. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 182, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1981 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Dover.Google Scholar
Christensen, U. & Harder, H. 1991 Three-dimensional convection with variable viscosity. Geophys. J. Intl 104, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, M. 2007 Modelling atmospheric flows. Acta Numerica 16, 67–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davaille, A. & Jaupart, C. 1994 Onset of thermal convection in fluids with temperature-dependent viscosity: application to the oceanic mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 19 843–19 866.Google Scholar
Davaille, A. & Limare, A. 2009 Laboratory studies of mantle convection. In Mantle Dynamics (ed. Schubert, G. & Bercovici, D.), Treatise on Geophysics, 7, pp. 89–165. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, F., Johannes, L., Dupont, O., Dewandel, J. L. & Legros, J. C. 1999 An integrated optical set-up for fluid physics experiments under microgravity conditions. Meas. Sci. Technol. 10, 934–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. A. 1995 Dynamics of Atmospheric Motion. Dover.Google Scholar
Egbers, C., Beyer, W., Bonhage, A., Hollerbach, R. & Beltrame, P. 2003 The GEOFLOW-experiment on ISS (Part I): Experimental preparation and design. Adv. Space Res. 32, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feudel, F., Bergemann, K., Tuckerman, L., Egbers, C., Futterer, B., Gellert, M. & Hollerbach, R. 2011 Convection patterns in a spherical fluid shell. Phys. Rev. E 83, 046304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIZ Chemie (Fachinformationszentrum Chemie GmbH, Berlin). 2010 Relative permittivity at zero frequency. 2010-03-29, ID 1972shkgal0, http://www.fiz-chemie.de/infotherm/.Google Scholar
Futterer, B., Brucks, A., Hollerbach, R. & Egbers, C. 2007 Thermal blob convection in spherical shells. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 50, 4079–4088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futterer, B., Dahley, N., Koch, S., Scurtu, N. & Egbers, C. 2012 From isoviscous convective experiment ‘GeoFlow I’ to temperature-dependent viscosity in ‘GeoFlow II’ – Fluid physics experiments on-board ISS for the capture of convection phenomena in Earth’s outer core and mantle. Acta Astronaut. 71, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futterer, B., Egbers, C., Dahley, N., Koch, S. & Jehring, L. 2010 First identification of sub- and supercritical convection patterns from GeoFlow, the geophysical flow simulation experiment integrated in Fluid Science Laboratory. Acta Astronaut. 66, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futterer, B., Scurtu, N., Egbers, C., Plesa, A.-C. & Breuer, D. 2009 Benchmark on Prandtl number influence for GeoFlow II, a mantle convection experiment in spherical shells. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Modelling of Mantle Convection and Lithospheric Dynamics, Braunwald, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Hansen, U. & Yuen, D. A. 1993 High Rayleigh number regime of temperature-dependent viscosity convection and the Earth’s nearly thermal history. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2191–2194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, U. & Yuen, D. A. 1994 Effects of depth-dependent thermal expansivity on the interaction of thermal chemical plumes with a compositional boundary. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 86, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. E., Glatzmaier, G. A. & Toomre, J. 1986 Space-Laboratory and numerical simulations of thermal convection in a rotating hemispherical shell with radial gravity. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 519–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, F., Hufschmid, R., Scheel, J. & Ahlers, G. 2010 Onset of Rayleigh–Bénard convection in cylindrical containers. Phys. Rev. E 81, 046318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernlund, J. W. & Tackley, P. J. 2008 Modelling mantle convection in the spherical annulus. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 274, 380–391.Google Scholar
Hollerbach, R. 2000 A spectral solution of the magneto-convection equations in spherical geometry. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 32, 773–797.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houseman, G. A. 1990 The thermal structure of mantle plumes: axisymmetric or triple junction?. Geophys. J. Intl 102, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttig, C. & Breuer, D. 2011 Regime classification and planform scaling for internally heated mantle convection. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 186, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttig, C. & Stemmer, K. 2008a Finite volume discretization for dynamic viscosities on Voronoi grids. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 171, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttig, C. & Stemmer, K. 2008b The spiral grid: a new approach to discretize the sphere and its application to mantle convection. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q02018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. B. 1979 Electrohydrodynamically enhanced heat transfer in liquids – a review. Adv. Heat Transfer 14, 107–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kameyama, M. & Ogawa, M. 2000 Transitions in thermal convection with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity in a wide box. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 180, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, L. H. & King, S. D. 1997 The effect of temperature dependent viscosity on the structure of new plumes in the mantle: results of a finite element model in a spherical, axisymmetric shell. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 148, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D., Lifshitz, E. M. & Pitaevskii, L. D. 1984 Course of Theoretical Physics – Electrodynamics of Continuous Media. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lide, D. R. 2008 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Malik, S. V., Yoshikawa, H. N., Crumeyrolle, O. & Mutabazi, I. 2012 Thermo-electro-hydrodynamic instabilities in a dielectric liquid under microgravity. Acta Astronaut. 81, 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoni, S. 2011 GeoFlow II experiment scientific requirements. RQ 3. European Space Agency ESA, European Space Research and Technology Centre ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, reference SCI-ESA-HSF-ESR-GEOFLOW II.Google Scholar
Merck (Merck KGaA Darmstadt, Germany). 2003 1-Nonanol zur Synthese. Safety Data Sheet 806866, 28.05.2003 (delivered with the liquids).Google Scholar
Merzkirch, W. 1987 Flow Visualization. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morris, S. & Canright, D. R. 1984 A boundary-layer analysis of Bénard convection with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 36, 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nataf, H. C. & Richter, F. M. 1982 Convection experiments in fluids with highly temperature-dependent viscosity and the thermal evolution of the planets. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 29, 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, M. 2008 Mantle convection: a review. Fluid Dyn. Res. 40, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, M., Schubert, G. & Zebib, A. 1991 Numerical simulations of three-dimensioanl thermal convection a fluid with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, J. T., Schubert, G. & Zebib, A. 1996 Effects of temperature-dependent viscosity on thermal convection in a spherical shell. Physica D 97, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, J. T., Tackley, P. J., Schubert, G. & Zebib, A. 1997 Transitions in thermal convection with strongly variable viscosity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 102, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, F. M., Nataf, H. C. & Daly, S. F. 1983 Heat transfer and horizontally averaged temperature of convection with large viscosity variations. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalzl, J., Breuer, M. & Hansen, U. 2002 The influence of the Prandtl number on the style of vigorous thermal convection. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 96, 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, G. & Bercovici, D. 2009 Mantle Dynamics, 7, Treatise on Geophysics, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Schubert, G., Glatzmaier, G. A. & Travis, B. 1993 Steady, three-dimensional, internally heated convection. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1928–1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, G. & Olson, P. 2009 Treatise on Geophysics – Core Dynamics. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Scurtu, N., Futterer, B. & Egbers, C. 2010 Pulsating and travelling wave modes of natural convection in spherical shells. Phys. Fluids 22, 114108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomatov, V. S. 1995 Scaling of temperature and stress-dependent viscosity convection. Phys. Fluids 7, 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemmer, K., Harder, H. & Hansen, U. 2006 A new method to simulate convection with strongly temperature- and pressure-dependent vicosity in a spherical shell: applications to the Earth’s mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 157, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengel, K. C., Oliver, D. S. & Booker, J. R. 1982 Onset of convection in a variable-viscosity fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, K., Calzavarini, E., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2007 Non-Oberbeck–Boussinesq effects in two-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection in glycerol. Europhys. Lett. 80, 34002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackley, P. J. 1993 Effects of strongly temperature-dependent viscosity on time-dependent three-dimensional models of mantle convection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2187–2190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackley, P. J. 1996 Effects of strongly variable viscosity on three-dimensional compressible convection in planetary mantles. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 3311–3332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travnikov, V., Egbers, C. & Hollerbach, R. 2003 The GEOFLOW-experiment on ISS (Part II): numerical simulation. Adv. Space Res. 32, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D. B. 1988 The planforms and onset of convection with a temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 191, 247–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisawa, T. & Yamagishi, Y. 2005 Rayleigh–Bénard convection in spherical shell with infinite Prandtl number at high Rayleigh number. J. Earth Sim. 4, 11–17.Google Scholar
Yavorskaya, I. M., Fomina, N. I. & Balyaev, Y. N. 1984 A simulation of central symmetry convection in microgravity conditions. Acta Astronaut. 11, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, H. N., Crumeyrolle, O. & Mutabazi, I. 2013 Dielectrophoretic force-driven thermal convection in annular geometry. Phys. Fluids 25, 024106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Childress, S. & Libchaber, A. 1997 Non-Boussinesq effect: thermal convection with broken symmetry. Phys. Fluids 9, 1034–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Liao, X. & Zhang, K. 2002 Patterns in spherical Rayleigh–Bénard convection: a giant spiral roll and its dislocations. Phys. Rev. E 66, 055203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, S., McNamara, A., Tan, E., Moresi, L. & Gurnis, M. 2008 A benchmark study on mantle convection in a 3-D spherical shell using CitcomS. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9, Q10017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, S., Zuber, M. T., Moresi, L. & Gurnis, M. 2000 Role of temperature-dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models of mantle convection. J. Geophys. Res. 105 (B5), 11 063–11 082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar