Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:57:02.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the breaking inception of unsteady water wave packets evolving in the presence of constant vorticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2021

Julien Touboul Open the ORCID record for Julien Touboul [Opens in a new window]  and
Michael L. Banner Open the ORCID record for Michael L. Banner [Opens in a new window]
Julien Touboul*
Affiliation:
Université de Toulon, Aix Marseille Univ., CNRS, IRD, MIO, Toulon, France
Michael L. Banner
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney2052, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent numerical study of Barthelemy et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 841, 2018, pp. 463–488) investigated the local properties of two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) nonlinear unsteady gravity wave packets in deep and uniform intermediate depth water. Their study focused on the breaking inception transition zone separating maximum recurrence and marginal breaking, and reported that a suitably normalized energy flux localized at the steepest crest in the packet provides a robust breaking threshold parameter. Our present study uses the fully nonlinear boundary integral element method solver developed by Touboul & Kharif (Nat. Haz., vol. 84, issue 2, 2016, pp. 585–598) to investigate breaking inception of 2-D deep water nonlinear water wave packets propagating in the presence of a background current that varies linearly with depth. We seek to validate whether the proposed generic breaking inception threshold holds for the case of constant background vorticity. Results are presented for different packet bandwidths and background vorticity levels.

JFM classification

Waves/Free-surface Flows: Surface gravity waves Waves/Free-surface Flows: Wave breaking
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 915 , 25 May 2021 , A16
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banner, M.L., Barthelemy, X., Fedele, F., Allis, M., Benetazzo, A., Dias, F. & Peirson, W.L. 2014 Linking reduced breaking crest speeds to unsteady nonlinear water wave group behaviour. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 114502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, M.L. & Peirson, W.L. 1998 On the determination of the onset of breaking for modulating surface gravity water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 367, 107–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, M.L. & Tian, X. 2007 Wave breaking onset and strength for two-dimensional deep-water wave groups. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthelemy, X., Banner, M.L., Peirson, W.L., Dias, F. & Allis, M. 2016 On the local properties of highly nonlinear unsteady gravity water waves. Part 1. Slowdown, kinematics and energetics. arXiv:1508.06001.Google Scholar
Barthelemy, X., Banner, M.L., Peirson, W.L., Fedele, F., Allis, M. & Dias, F. 2018 On a unified breaking onset threshold for gravity waves in deep and intermediate depth water. J. Fluid Mech. 841, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belibassakis, K.A., Simon, B., Touboul, J. & Rey, V. 2017 A coupled-mode model for water wave scattering by vertically sheared currents in variable bathymetry regions. Wave Motion 74, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belibassakis, K. & Touboul, J. 2019 A nonlinear coupled-mode model for waves propagating in vertically sheared currents in variable bathymetry—collinear waves and currents. Fluids 4 (2), 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belibassakis, K., Touboul, J., Laffitte, E. & Rey, V. 2019 A mild-slope system for Bragg scattering of water waves by sinusoidal bathymetry in the presence of vertically sheared currents. J. Mar. Sci. Engng 7 (1), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantin, A. 2015 The time evolution of the maximal horizontal surface fluid velocity for an irrotational wave approaching breaking. J. Fluid Mech. 768, 468–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantin, A., Strauss, W. & Varvaruca, E. 2016 Global bifurcation of steady gravity water waves with critical layers. Acta Math. 217, 195–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhti, M., Banner, M. & Kirby, J.T. 2018 Predicting the breaking strength of gravity water waves in deep and intermediate depth. J. Fluid Mech. 848, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhti, M. & Kirby, J.T. 2016 Breaking-onset, energy and momentum flux in unsteady focused wave packets. J. Fluid Mech. 790, 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhti, M., Thomson, J. & Kirby, J.T. 2020 Sparse sampling of intermittent turbulence generated by breaking surface waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 50, 867–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyachenko, S.A. & Hur, V. 2019 Stokes waves with constant vorticity: I. Numerical computation. Stud. Appl. Maths 142, 162–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, F. 2014 Geometric phases of water waves. Europhys. Lett. 107 (6), 69001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, T.B. & Swan, C. 2001 A laboratory study of the focusing of transient and directionally spread surface water waves. Proc. R. Soc. A 457 (2008), 971–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, T.B. & Swan, C. 2003 On the nonlinear dynamics of wave groups produced by the focusing of surface water waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 1021–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsardi, V. & Swan, C. 2011 The evolution of large non-breaking waves in intermediate and shallow water. I. Numerical calculations of uni-directional seas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 467 (2127), 778–805.Google Scholar
Kharif, C., Abid, M. & Touboul, J. 2017 Rogue waves in shallow water in the presence of a vertically sheared current. J. Ocean Engng Mar. Energy 3 (4), 297–423.Google Scholar
Kurnia, R. & Van-Groesen, E. 2014 High order hamiltonian water wave models with wave breaking mechanism. Coast. Engng 93, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C.I. 2016 On the maximal horizontal surface velocity for a rotational water wave near breaking. Ann. Math. 195, 1659–1664.Google Scholar
Merkoune, D., Touboul, J., Abcha, N., Mouazé, D. & Ezersky, A. 2013 Focusing wave group on a current of finite depth. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 2941–2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwogu, O.G. 2009 Interaction of finite-amplitude waves with vertically sheared current fields. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 179–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlin, M., Choi, W. & Tian, Z. 2013 Breaking waves in deep and intermediate waters. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45 (1), 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, V., Charland, J. & Touboul, J. 2014 Wave–current interaction in the presence of a three-dimensional bathymetry: deep water wave focusing in opposing current conditions. Phys. Fluids 26 (9), 096601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiffert, B., Ducrozet, G. & Bonnefoy, F. 2017 Simulation of breaking waves using the high-order spectral method with laboratory experiments: wave-breaking onset. Ocean Model. 119, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shemer, L. 2013 On kinematics of very steep waves. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (8), 2101–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shemer, L. & Ee, B.K. 2015 Steep unidirectional wave groups - fully nonlinear simulations versus experiments. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 22 (6), 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shemer, L. & Liberzon, D. 2014 Lagrangian kinematics of steep waves up to the inception of a spilling breaker. Phys. Fluids 26, 016601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmen, J.A. 1984 Steady deep-water waves on a linear shear current. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Song, J.-B. & Banner, M.L. 2002 On determining the onset and strength of breaking for deep water waves. Part I: unforced irrotational wave groups. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 32 (9), 2541–2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, G.G. 1847 On the theory of oscillatory flows. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 8, 441–455.Google Scholar
Tian, Z., Perlin, M. & Choi, W. 2008 Evaluation of a deep-water wave breaking criterion. Phys. Fluids 20 (6), 066604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touboul, J. & Belibassakis, K. 2019 A novel method for water waves propagating in the presence of vortical mean flows over variable bathymetry. J. Ocean Engng Mar. Energy 5, 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touboul, J., Charland, J., Rey, V. & Belibassakis, K. 2016 Extended mild-slope equation for surface waves interacting with a vertically sheared current. Coast. Engng 116, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touboul, J. & Kharif, C. 2010 Two-dimensional direct numerical simulations of the dynamics of rogue waves under wind action. In Advances in Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Water Waves, vol. 11, chap. 2. The World Scientific Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touboul, J. & Kharif, C. 2016 Effect of vorticity on the generation of rogue waves due to dispersive focusing. Nat. Hazards 84 (2), 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touboul, J. & Kharif, C. 2018 Focusing Wave Group Propagating in Finite Depth in the Presence of Surface Current and Vorticity, pp. 77–90. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touboul, J., Pelinovsky, E. & Kharif, C. 2007 Nonlinear focusing wave groups on current. J. Korean Soc. Coast. Ocean Engrs 19 (3), 222–227.Google Scholar
Tulin, M.P. & Landrini, M. 2000 Breaking waves in the ocean and around ships. In Twenty-Third Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 713–745. Office of Naval Research, Bassin d'Essais des Carènes, National Research Council.Google Scholar