Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:45:41.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stock Splits, Broker Promotion, and Decimalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Palani-Rajan Kadapakkam ,
Srinivasan Krishnamurthy  and
Yiuman Tse
Palani-Rajan Kadapakkam
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Finance, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249
Srinivasan Krishnamurthy
Affiliation:
[email protected], School of Management, State University of New York-Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902
Yiuman Tse
Affiliation:
[email protected], College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 West Durango Blvd., San Antonio, TX 78207.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stock split ex-dates are associated with both an increased intensity of small investor buying and a positive abnormal return. The broker promotion hypothesis suggests that the increase in relative spread after a split induces brokers to promote splitting stocks to small investors. The trading inconvenience hypothesis ascribes the ex-split effects to inconveniences such as investors' aversion to dealing with due bills, which is unrelated to relative spreads. The reduction in the bid-ask spread due to decimalization allows us to disentangle these two hypotheses. During the 1/8th pricing period, we show that after the ex-date, the relative spread increases significantly. The average buy order size decreases and the frequency of small transactions increases after the split. After decimalization, these changes are smaller in magnitude. We observe significant positive abnormal returns around the ex-date during the 1/8th pricing period, but not in the decimal pricing period. These results support the broker promotion hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 873 - 895
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angel, J. J. “Tick Size, Share Price and Stock Splits.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 655–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. K., and Gallagher, P. L.. “Management's View of Stock Splits”. Financial Management, 9 (1980), 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, M.; Christie, W. G.; Harris, J. H.; Kandel, E.; and Schultz, P.. “The Effects of Market Reformon the Trading Costs of Nasdaq Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, M. T.; Hendershott, T.; and McCormick, D. T.. “Competition among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2637–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneish, M. D., and Whaley, R. E.. “An Anatomy of the” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 1909–1930.Google Scholar
Bessembinder, H. “Trade Execution Costs on Nasdaq and the NYSE: A Post-Reform Comparison.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34 (1999), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H. “Tick Size, Spreads, and Liquidity: An Analysis of Nasdaq Securities Trading Near Ten Dollars.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9 (2000), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H. “Trade Execution Costs and Market Quality after Decimalization.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38 (2003a), 747–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H. “Issues in Assessing Trade Execution Costs.” Journal of Financial Markets, 6 (2003), 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W. G., and Schultz, P.. “The Initiation and Withdrawal of Odd-Eighth Quotes Among Nasdaq Stocks: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 52 (1999), 409–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, K. H.; Chuwonganant, C.; and McCormick, D. T.. “Order Preferencing and Market Quality on Nasdaq Before and After Decimalization.” Journal of Financial Economics, 71 (2004), 581–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, T. “Liquidity Changes Following Stock Splits.” Journal of Finance, 34 (1979), 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J. S., and Conroy, R. M.. “Market Microstructure and the Ex-Date Return.” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994), 1507–1519.Google Scholar
Conroy, R.; Harris, R.; and Benet, R.. “The Effect of Stock Splits on Bid-Ask Spreads.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 1285–1295.Google Scholar
Dhar, R.; Goetzmann, W.; and Zhu, N.. “The Impact of Clientele Changes: Evidence from Stock Splits.” Working Paper 03–14, Yale ICF (2003).Google Scholar
Graham, J. R.; Michaely, R.; and Roberts, M.. “Do Price Discreteness and Transactions Costs Affect Stock Returns? Ex-day Evidence During the 1/16ths and Decimal Pricing Eras.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2613–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, S.; Smith, T.; and Whaley, R. E.. “Stock Splits: Implications for Investor Trading Costs.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 10 (2003), 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinblatt, M. S.; Masulis, R.; and Titman, S.. “The Valuation Effects of Stock Splits and Stock Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidle, H. G., and Huang, R. D.. “Information-Based Trading in Dealer and Auction Markets: An Analysis of Exchange Listings.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37 (2002), 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, K., and Ma, T.. “Tick Size, NYSE Rule 118 and Ex-Dividend Stock Price Behavior.” Journal of Financial Economics, 72 (2004), 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim, D. B. “Trading Patterns, Bid-Ask Spreads and Estimated Stock Returns: The Case of Common Stocks at Calendar Turning Points.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A., and Lee, C. M. C.. “Mass Psychology and Stock Returns: The Case of Retail Trades.” Working Paper, Cornell Univ. (2004).Google Scholar
Lee, C. M. C., and Ready, M. J.. “Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, M. T., and Mulherin, J. H.. “The Effect of Splitting on the Ex: A Microstructure Reconciliation.” Financial Management, 21 (1992), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C. “A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscarella, C. J., and Vetsuypens, M. R.. “Stock Splits: Signaling or Liquidity? The Case of ADR ‘Solo-Splits’.” Journal of Financial Economics, 42 (1996), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, N., and Rozeff, M. S.. “Record Date, When Issued and Ex Date Effects in Stock Splits.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (2001), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. “Stock Splits, Tick Size and Sponsorship.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijh, A. “The Spinoff and Merger Ex-Date Effects.” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994), 581–609.Google Scholar