No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comment: The Strange Journey of Monetary Indicators
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
Extract
I find a great deal in Kaufman's paper with which I am in agreement, and I think that setting out the two approaches, the neutralized variable approach versus the ideal indicator, is very useful. I have nothing to add to what Kaufman has said about the work on neutralized variables, even though I know there are a few people who do not consider this a closed issue.
- Type
- Discussant
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972
References
1 Kaufman, p. 1625.
2 Ibid., p. 1625.
3 keran, Michael W., “Selecting a Monetary Indicator — Evidence from the United States and Other Developed Countries,” Review (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, September 1970), pp. 8–19.Google Scholar
4 See Saving, Thomas R., “Monetary-Policy Targets and Indicators,” Journal of Political Economy (August 1967), p. 446.Google Scholar
5 Andersen, Leonall C. and Jordan, Jerry L., “Monetary and’ Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization,” Review (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, November 1968), p. 22.Google ScholarPubMed
6 Kaufman, p. 1625.
7 Gibson, William E. and Kaufman, George G., “The Sensitivity of Interest Rates to Changes in Money and Income,” Journal of Political Economy 76, No. 3 (May/June 1968), pp. 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar