Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:50:34.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment: The Strange Journey of Monetary Indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Jerry L. Jordan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I find a great deal in Kaufman's paper with which I am in agreement, and I think that setting out the two approaches, the neutralized variable approach versus the ideal indicator, is very useful. I have nothing to add to what Kaufman has said about the work on neutralized variables, even though I know there are a few people who do not consider this a closed issue.

Type
Discussant
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 1643 - 1646
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kaufman, p. 1625.

2 Ibid., p. 1625.

3 keran, Michael W., “Selecting a Monetary Indicator — Evidence from the United States and Other Developed Countries,” Review (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, September 1970), pp. 8–19.Google Scholar

4 See Saving, Thomas R., “Monetary-Policy Targets and Indicators,” Journal of Political Economy (August 1967), p. 446.Google Scholar

5 Andersen, Leonall C. and Jordan, Jerry L., “Monetary and’ Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization,” Review (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, November 1968), p. 22.Google ScholarPubMed

6 Kaufman, p. 1625.

7 Gibson, William E. and Kaufman, George G., “The Sensitivity of Interest Rates to Changes in Money and Income,” Journal of Political Economy 76, No. 3 (May/June 1968), pp. 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar