Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:18:45.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milking performance and udder health of cows milked with two different liners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1998

MORTEN D. RASMUSSEN
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
ERIK S. FRIMER
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
LIISA KAARTINEN
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
NIELS E. JENSEN
Affiliation:
Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Bülowsvej 27, DK-1790 København V, Denmark

Abstract

The effects of milking cows with two different liners were measured for a period of 8 months with 115 Danish Holstein cows divided into two groups. Group H and L animals were milked with liners with mouthpiece cavity heights of 30 and 18 mm respectively (other dimensions also differed between the two liners). Average teat lengths of first lactation cows were 45 and 40 mm for front and rear teats. Older cows had teats ∼10 mm longer. There was no difference in milk yield or milk flow rates between the two groups. Average machine-on time was shorter for group L, and first lactation cows of group L were less restive. The frequency of red and blue discoloured teats immediately after milking was higher for group H, and teat length increased on average 5 mm during lactation with no increase for group L. The small overall differences in udder health between the two groups were not significant. Udder health was better for first lactation cows of group L, even though liners of group L slipped more often and cows with recorded liner slip had poorer udder health. We conclude that special attention should be given to first lactation cows when liner type is selected for a herd. We propose that breeding programmes should ensure that teat length is kept above 50 mm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)