Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:18:47.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

306 Long-Term Appearance and Outcomes after Strip Craniectomy Compared with Open Cranial Vault Reconstruction for Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2023

Elizabeth Danial
Affiliation:
UCSF
Elizabeth Danial
Affiliation:
UCSF, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Peter Sun
Affiliation:
UCSF, Department of Neurosurgery
Jason Pomerantz
Affiliation:
UCSF, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Strip craniectomy with orthotic helmet therapy (SCOT) and open cranial vault reconstruction (OCVR) are mainstay surgical treatments for sagittal craniosynostosis. The purpose of this study is to compare long-term morphologic outcomes of the skull, subjective appearance, and perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent SCOT and OCVR. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Patients who underwent SCOT or OCVR for isolated, non-syndromic sagittal craniosynostosis with preoperative computerized tomography (CT) imaging were identified at UCSF between 2000 and 2020. Perioperative outcomes were extracted from the medical chart. Anthropometric measurements will be used to assess baseline severity using preoperative CT imaging and postoperative skull morphology using 3D camera imaging. Patient satisfaction surveys will be administered to parents at the time of postoperative 3D imaging. Subjective appearance will be rated among adolescents and craniofacial surgeons using patients’ postoperative 3D imaging. Descriptive statistics will be calculated using Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney U. Chi-square tests and Fisher exact tests will be used to compare categorical outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 47 patients were included in the study (18 SCOT and 29 OCVR) with similar follow-up between groups (SCOT 2.3 +/- 1.5, OCVR 2.6 +/- 2.0). There were no significant differences in sex or race. OCVR had longer operative times (p-value 0.0003), higher estimated blood loss (p DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: SCOT was associated with superior perioperative outcomes compared with OCVR due to its minimally invasive technique. Our results for long-term healing outcomes and subjective appearance may further guide craniofacial surgeons in selecting the most optimal operative technique.

Type
Precision Medicine/Health
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science