Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:02:47.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicative abilities in children: An assessment through different phenomena and expressive means*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2013

FRANCESCA M. BOSCO ,
ROMINA ANGELERI ,
LIVIA COLLE ,
KATIUSCIA SACCO  and
BRUNO G. BARA
FRANCESCA M. BOSCO
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, and Neuroscience Institute of Turin
ROMINA ANGELERI
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin
LIVIA COLLE
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, and Neuroscience Institute of Turin
KATIUSCIA SACCO
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Neuroscience Institute of Turin, and CCS fMRI Neuroradiology at Koelliker Hospital, Turin
BRUNO G. BARA
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, and Neuroscience Institute of Turin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies on children's pragmatic abilities have tended to focus on just one pragmatic phenomenon and one expressive means at a time, mainly concentrating on comprehension, and overlooking the production side. We assessed both comprehension and production in relation to several pragmatic phenomena (simple and complex standard communication acts, irony, and deceit) and several expressive means (linguistic, extralinguistic, paralinguistic). Our study involved 390 Italian-speaking children divided into three age groups: 5;0–5;6, 6;6–7;0, and 8;0–8;6. Children's performance on all tasks improved with their age. Within each age group, children responded more accurately to tasks involving standard communication than to those involving deceit and irony, across all expressive means and for both comprehension and production. Within each pragmatic phenomenon, children responded more accurately to simple acts than to complex ones, regardless of age group and expressive means, i.e., linguistic or extralinguistic. Overall results fit well with the Cognitive Pragmatics theory (Bara, 2010).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , September 2013 , pp. 741 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by Regione Piemonte, Project: Institutions, Behavior and Markets in Local and Global Settings (Project IIINBEMA).

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C., Cooke, R., Crutchley, A., Hesketh, A. & Reeves, D. (2001). Assessment of comprehension and expression 6–11 (ACE 6–11). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Airenti, G. (1998). Dialogue in a developmental perspective. In Cmejrkovà, S., Hoffmannovà, J. & Svetlà, J. (eds.), Dialoganalyse VI, Teil 1. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Airenti, G. & Angeleri, R. (2011). Situation-sensitive use of insincerity: pathways of communication in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29, 765–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angeleri, R., Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Bara, B. G. & Sacco, K. (2012). Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data. Behavior Research Methods 44, 845–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bara, B. G. (2010). Cognitive pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M. & Bucciarelli, M. (1999a). Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children. Brain and Language 68, 507–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M. & Bucciarelli, M. (1999b). Simple and complex speech acts: what makes the difference within a developmental perspective. In Hahn, M. & Stoness, S. C. (eds.), Proceedings of the XXI Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 55–60. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bara, B. G., Bucciarelli, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). Development of syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology 2, 157–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, J. & Legros, S. (1987). Direct and indirect directives: what do young children understand? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 43, 346–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1998). Development of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): a method of assessing qualitative aspects of communication impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39, 879–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosco, F. M., Angeleri, R., Zuffranieri, M., Bara, B. G. & Sacco, K. (2012). Assessment battery for communication: development of two equivalent forms. Journal of Communication Disorders 45, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosco, F. M. & Bucciarelli, M. (2008). Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, F. M., Bucciarelli, M. & Bara, B. G. (2004). The fundamental context categories in understanding communicative intention. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, F. M., Bucciarelli, M. & Bara, B. G. (2006). Recognition and repair of communicative failures: a developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1398–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, F. M., Vallana, M. & Bucciarelli, M. (2009). Comprehension of communicative intentions: the case of figurative language. Journal of Cognitive Science 10, 245–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, F. M., Vallana, M. & Bucciarelli, M. (2012). The inferential chain makes the difference between familiar and novel figurative expressions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24, 525–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 371–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretherton, I., Fritz, J., Zahn-Waxler, C. & Ridgeway, D. (1986). Learning to talk about emotions: a functionalist perspective. Child Development 57, 529–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L. & Bara, B. G. (2003). How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics 35, 207–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creusere, M. (2000). A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: children's recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity. Metaphor and Symbol 15, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marco, I., Colle, L. & Bucciarelli, M. (2007). Linguistic and extralinguistic communication in deaf children. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 134–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demorest, A., Meyer, C., Phelps, E., Gardner, H. & Winner, E. (1984). Words speak louder than actions: understanding deliberately false remarks. Child Development 55, 1527–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewart, H. & Summers, S. (1997). The pragmatics profile of communication skill in childhood. Windsor: NFR-Nelson.Google Scholar
Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A. & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development 67, 3071–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people: evidence from observations within the family. In Frye, D. & Moore, C. (eds.), Children's theories of mind: mental states and social understanding, 97–114. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. & Oster, H. (1979). Facial expression of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology 20, 527–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enrici, I., Adenzato, M., Cappa, S., Bara, B. G. & Tettamanti, M. (2011). Intention processing in communication: a common brain network for language and gestures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, 2415–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippova, E. & Astington, J. W. (2008). Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development 1, 126–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, M. & Bryant, J. B. (2000). A developmental lexical bias in the interpretation of discrepant messages. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology 46, 342–69.Google Scholar
Giora, R. & Fein, O. (1999). Irony comprehension: the graded salience hypothesis. Humor 12, 425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenwright, M. & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children's ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language 37, 429–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Herba, C. & Phillips, M. (2004). Annotation. Development of facial expression recognition from childhood to adolescence: behavioural and neurological perspectives. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45, 1185–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factors index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kasher, A. (1991). Pragmatics and Chomsky's research program. In Kasher, A. (ed.), The Chomskyan turn, 122–49.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M., Stanger, C. & Sullivan, M. (1989). Deception in 3-year olds. Developmental Psychology 25, 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P., Peers, I. & Foster, C. (2001). The Listening Skills Test. Hove: Psychological Corporation.Google ScholarPubMed
London, K. & Nunez, N. (2002). Examining the efficacy of truth/lie discussions in predicting and increasing the veracity of children's reports. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83, 131–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucariello, J. & Mindolovich, C. (1995). The development of complex meta-representational reasoning: the case of situational irony. Cognitive Development 10, 551–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, K. (2007). Maternal education and children's academic achievement during middle childhood. Developmental Psychology 43, 1497–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrabian, A. & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6, 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. B. & Trehub, S. E. (2001). Children's understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development 72, 834–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J., Ruffman, T. & Leekam, S. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: you catch it from your sibs. Child Development 65, 1228–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J. & Winner, E. (1985). ‘John thinks, that Mary thinks that …’ Attribution of second-order belief by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Child Experimental Psychology 39, 437–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M. & Glenwright, M. (2007). How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony? Journal of Neurolinguistics 2, 178–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, F., Harris, P. L. & de Ronsey, M. (2004). Emotional comprehension between 3 and 11 years: developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 1, 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 512–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pungello, E. P., Iruka, I. U., Dotterer, A. M., Mills-Koonce, R. & Reznick, J. S. (2009). The effects of socioeconomic status, race, and parenting on language development in early childhood. Developmental Psychology 45, 544–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, R. 1980. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, E. D. (2000). Affective prosody and aprosodias. In Marsel Mesulam, M. (ed.), Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology, 316–31. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Row, M. (2008) Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language 35, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J., Jarrold, C. & Potel, D. (1995). What makes strategic deception difficult for children: the deception or the strategy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 12, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Bosco, F. M., Colle, L., Mate, D. & Bara, B. G. (2008). Assessment Battery for Communication – ABaCo: a new instrument for the evaluation of pragmatic abilities. Journal of Cognitive Science 9, 111–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R., (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: speech acts, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sodian, B. (1991). The development of deception in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9, 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striano, T. & Vaish, A. (2006). Seven- to 9-month-old infants use facial expressions to interpret others' actions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talwar, V. & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children's lying behavior. Child Development 79, 866–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tirassa, M., Bosco, F. M. & Colle, L. (2006a). Sharedness and privateness in human early social life. Cognitive Systems Research 7, 128–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirassa, M., Bosco, F. M. & Colle, L. (2006b). Rethinking the ontogeny of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition 15, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin 91, 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. & Leekman, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9, 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. (1988). How children think and learn: the social context of cognitive development. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar