Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:34:19.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justice or Legitimacy: A Response to Ocko and Gilmartin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Paul W. Kahn
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 106 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tracing those details is the project I take up in Legitimacy and History: Self-Government in American Constitutional Theory (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992) and in The Reign of Law: Marbury v. Madison and the Construction of America (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1997).

2 The distinction of the subject of sovereignty from the content of law is at the center of my analysis in Putting Liberalism in Its Place (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004), 250–58.

3 On the relationship of violence to political meaning, see Kahn, Paul W., Sacred Violence: Torture, Terror and Sovereignty (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 A fuller account of Chinese law within the party-state of the twentieth century would also need to consider how law played similar or dissimilar roles in the Soviet Union.