Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:11:07.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Burn-in and mixed populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Henry W. Block*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Jie Mi*
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Thomas H. Savits*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, Florida International University, Tamiami Trail, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Abstract

Burn-in is a procedure used for eliminating weak components in a mixed population. In this paper we focus on general mixed populations. Three types of results are established. First, it is shown that any mixed population displays a type of monotonicity property which is appropriate for burn-in. Second, it is shown that if, asymptotically, components have constant failure rates, then the mixed population will also asymptotically have a constant failure rate and this will correspond to the rate of the strongest subpopulation of the mixture. Finally, it is shown for a reasonable cost function, that if one mixture distribution dominates another in a strong sense, the resulting mixture of the dominant distribution will have larger optimal burn-in time.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Research supported by NSA Grant No. RO909237 and NSF Grant No. DMS-9203444.

References

Clarotti, C. A. and Spizzichino, F. (1990) Bayes burn-in decision procedures. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 4, 437445.Google Scholar
Jensen, F. and Peterson, N. E. (1982) Burn-in. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. and Rinott, Y. (1980) Classes of orderings of measures and related correlation inequalities. J. Multivariate Anal. 10, 499516.Google Scholar
Mi, Jie (1991) Optimal Burn-in. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Mathematics and Statistics.Google Scholar