Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:07:43.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hawthorne, Madonna, and Lady Gaga: The Marble Faun's Transgressive Miriam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

MICHAEL BROEK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most criticism of Nathaniel Hawthorne's Novel The Marble Faun has focussed on its many images of domestic containment, its supposed argument in favor of Christian idealism, as well as Hawthorne's apparent “castration” of the American sculptor Kenyon – just another in a long list of the author's male protagonists who succumb to a mixture of self-doubt (Dimmesdale, in The Scarlet Letter), narcissism (Coverdale, in The Blithedale Romance), and the allure of the chaste virgin (Holgrave, in The House of the Seven Gables). This essay, however, argues that Miriam, the novel's chief female protagonist, actually completes a complicated “liberation” from the proscriptions (as Hawthorne envisioned them) of her gender, enacted by her embrace of multiple, ancient, and organic symbols. Through a simultaneous analysis of the American music icons Madonna and Lady Gaga, we find that Hawthorne engages a complex set of ideational forces – misogyny, Catholicism, and female eros – as Miriam emerges, like these famous pop stars, as an independent artist, a position that not one of the author's male protagomists is able to attain. In this sense, Miriam may be reconsidered Hawthorne's internationalized Hester, or, more aptly, his mature Pearl.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , August 2012 , pp. 625 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Like a Virgin,” dir. Mary Lambert, Like a Virgin (Sire Records, Warner, 1984).

2 “Alejandro,” dir. Steven Klein, The Fame Monster (Interscope, 2009).

3 “Express Yourself,” dir. David Fincher, Like a Prayer (Sire Records Warner, 1989).

4 “Like a Prayer,” dir. Mary Lambert, Like a Prayer (Sire Records Warner, 1989).

5 “Oh Father,” dir. David Fincher, Like a Prayer (Sire Records, Warner, 1989).

6 Camille Paglia, “No Sex Please, We're Middle Class,” New York Times, 27 June 2010, WK12.

7 Camille Paglia, “Dr. Paglia,” Vamps & Tramps: New Essays (New York: Vintage, 1994), 247. Though both Madonna and Gaga have been the subject of feminist debates, these debates are not central to this argument as my focus here is on the homologous relationship between Hawthorne's character Miriam and these two pop artists. The term “transgressive” is used here in the sense of border-crossing and is not necessarily evaluative of Madonna's or Gaga's relationship to feminism.

8 As Hawthorne biographer Brenda Wineapple notes, Una “served as the model for Pearl.” Brenda Wineapple, Hawthorne: A Life (New York: Knopf, 2003), 4.

9 Nina Baym, “Revisiting Hawthorne's Feminism,” in Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter and Other Writings, ed. Leland S. Person, Norton Critical Edition (New York: Norton, 2005), 557.

10 Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter and Other Writings, 64.

11 Ibid., 65.

12 Ibid., 115.

13 Ibid., 62.

14 Sacvan Bercovitch. “The A-Politics of Ambiguity in The Scarlet Letter,” in Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter and Other Writings, 583.

15 Hutner, Gordon, “Whose Hawthorne?” Cambridge Companion To Nathaniel Hawthorne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 263Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., 263, 262.

17 I mean here to refer to those readings, such as Bercovitch's, that render Hawthorne's works as allegories of domestic, and hence political, containment.

18 Obviously, it is no surprise that violence and female sexuality are bound up in early American literature, as in Native American captivity narratives or the leatherstocking novels of Cooper, but these representations are particularly Protestant. The additional consideration that I am suggesting here is the Catholic iconography, which Hawthorne first encountered in a sustained way during his travels in Italy (1858–59) following his four-year stint as the US consul in Liverpool.

19 John Seabrook, “Transformer” New Yorker Online, 1 Feb. 2010.

20 Hawthorne, Nathaniel, The Marble Faun (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 356–57Google Scholar. The Oxford University Press edition is based on the authoritative Volume IV of the Centenary Editions of the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne of the Ohio State University Press.

21 Though Hilda has artistic skill, she is rendered a “copyist.”

22 This may be an unusual reading of Hepzibah, but she is the only character in the novel who has to come to terms with her “fallen” state and assume a new course of life, this time as the proprietor of a cent-shop. She is Phoebe's antipode.

23 Wineapple, Hawthorne: A Life, 176.

24 Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The Artist of the Beautiful,” in idem, Tales and Sketches, ed. Roy Harvey Pearce (New York: Library of America, 1982), 910, 912.

25 Straus, Neil, “The Broken Heart & Wild Fantasies of Lady Gaga” Rolling Stone, 1108/09 (8 July 2010), 66–74Google Scholar.

26 “Bad Romance,” dir. Francis Lewis, The Fame Monster (Interscope, 2009).

27 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 345.

28 Ibid., 346.

29 Baym, Nina, “The Marble Faun: Hawthorne's Elegy For Art,” The New England Quarterly, 44, 3 (Sept. 1971), 365CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 298, 299.

31 Baym, “The Marble Faun: Hawthorne's Elegy For Art,” 371.

32 Baym notes that Hawthorne's characterization of Hilda, insofar as her self-repression represents “the apotheosis of his culture's ills,” is dangerous since it mocks conservative Christian idealism. “He is risking professional destruction,” writes Baym, “The Marble Faun: Hawthorne's Elegy For Art,” 369.

33 McElroy, Steven, “One for the Pope,” New York Times, 8 Sept. 2008, E2Google Scholar.

34 Brodtkorb, Paul Jr., “Art Allegory in The Marble Faun,” PMLA, 77, 3 (June 1962), 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 332.

36 Ibid., 334.

37 Ibid., 35–36.

38 Bercovitch, Sacvan, “Of Wise and Foolish Virgins: Hilda versus Miriam in Hawthorne's Marble Faun,” New England Quarterly, 41, 2 (June 1968), 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Ibid., 286.

40 For the popular reception of The Marble Faun, see Wineapple, Hawthorne: A Life, 326.

41 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 137.

42 Ibid., 143.

43 Ibid., 143, emphasis added.

44 Ibid., 144.

45 “Justify My Love,” dir. Jean-Baptiste Mondino, The Immaculate Collection (Sire Records Warner, 1990).

46 Interview with Forrest Sawyer, Nightline, 3 Dec. 1990.

47 I understand that feminist critics might consider this statement highly arguable. See note 7 above.

48 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 149.

49 Ibid., 101.

50 Ibid., 308.

51 Ibid., 332.

52 Ibid., 336.

53 Ibid., 20.

54 Ibid., 44.

55 Ibid., 354.

56 Ibid., 355.

57 Ibid., 354.

58 Ibid., 288.

59 Ibid., 288.

60 Not including the Postscript, which was added by Hawthorne to the second edition at the behest of a confused reading public.

61 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 358, emphasis added.

62 Ibid., 358.

63 Ibid., 99.

64 Brodtkorb, “Art Allegory in The Marble Faun,” 255.

65 Hawthorne, The Marble Faun, 7.

66 Traisnel, Antoine, “The Temptation of Kitsch: The Fall of Hawthorne,” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, 34, 1–2 (Spring–Fall 2008), 65Google Scholar.

67 Ibid., 77.

68 McElroy, “One for the Pope,” E2.

69 Krista Smith, “Forever Cher,” Vanity Fair, Dec. 2010.

70 Milder, Robert, “Beautiful Illusions: Hawthorne and the Site of Moral Law,” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, 33, 2 (Fall 2007), 10Google Scholar.

71 Lady Gaga, “Dance in the Dark,” The Fame Monster (Interscope, 2009).