Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:53:32.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual judgements of quality in meat II. A simplification of the assessment of the proportion of lean to fat in bacon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. P. Gatherum ,
G. Harrington  and
R. W. Pomeroy
D. P. Gatherum
Affiliation:
Low Temperature Research Station, University of Cambridge, and D.S.I.R.
G. Harrington
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Statistics Group, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
R. W. Pomeroy
Affiliation:
A.R.C. and School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The visual judgement of bacon quality called the ‘proportion of lean to fat’ has been simplified by breaking down the overall assessment of the surface seen on the cut bacon side at the last rib into four simpler scores—of the ‘eye’-muscle size and shape, the amount and distribution of fat on the back rasher, the streak thickness and the proportion of lean to fat in the streak, each judged on a 10-point scale. An experiment is described in which eight experienced judges attempted to score these new characteristics in conjunction with the overall assessment.

2. The judging standard adopted in the overall assessment of the proportion of lean to fat varied less from batch to batch in this experiment (in which the seven batches were arrayed in fixed positions and assessed in one day) than in an earlier experiment (when the examples seen in each batch could be shuffled and the eleven batches were seen several days apart). The ranking of judges according to their discrimination and repeatability for the overall assessment was also changed in the second experiment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1960 , pp. 145 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gatherum, D. P., Harrington, G. & Pomeroy, R. (1958). Occup. Psychol. 10 1958.Google Scholar
Gatherum, D. P., Harrington, G. & Pomeroy, R. W. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar