Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:07:59.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of rainfall, temperature, and actual transpiration in some crop-weather investigations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. F. Buck
S. F. Buck
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper reports various investigations of the effects of meteorological factors on the yields of crops in England and Wales. The investigations were undertaken primarily with the objects of seeing (a) whether variations in temperature had any direct effect on yields, and (b) whether Penman's concept of actual transpiration gave a better measure of the overall effect of rainfall than the use of a multiple regression on variates representing total rainfall and its distribution.

The effect of temperature and its seasonal distribution on the yields of wheat on various plots of the classical wheat experiment on Broadbalk field at Rothamsted was studied in conjunction with rainfall and its seasonal distribution, using the regression method devised by Fisher. Variations in temperature were found to show no effects on the final yields.

The relationship between actual transpiration and yield was investigated for the Broadbalk field and for sugar beet and potatoes, using average yields determined by sampling methods, for various districts in England and Wales. For sugar-beet virus yellows infection, and for potatoes blight attack, were also taken into account.

No relationship between actual transpiration and wheat yields on Broadbalk field was found, but sugar beet and potatoes both showed a positive association between actual transpiration and yield except for sugar beet in the Spalding area, where there is a high-water table. Actual transpiration was in general more effective than a regression on total rainfall and its distribution accounting for variations in yield. As might be expected virus yellows and blight also account for a good deal of the variation in yield.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , November 1961 , pp. 355 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, M. N. (1936). J. Agric. Sci. 26, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. A. (1939). Ann. Eugen., Lond., 9, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashen, R. O. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1924). Phil. Trans. B, 213, 89Google Scholar
Hooker, R. H. (1907). J. B. Statist. Soc. 70, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, R. H. (1922). Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 48, 115.Google Scholar
Kramer, P. J. (1949). Plants and Soil Water Relationship. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Large, E. C. (1953). Plant Path. 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1956). Plant Path. 5, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1958). Plant Path. 7, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1959). Agriculture, 65, 603.Google Scholar
Lawes, J. B. & Gilbert, J. H. (1880). J. B. agric. Soc. 16, 173.Google Scholar
Minist. Agric. (1954). Tech. Bull., no. 4.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1949). J. Soil Sci. 1, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1956). Trans. Amer. Geograph. Un. 37, 43.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1956). Netherlands J. agric. Sci. 4, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1956). The Growth of Leaves. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1953). J. Oper. Res. Soc. Amer. 1, 33.Google Scholar
Tippett, L. H. C. (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar