Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:34:41.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistical research on the fate of dietary mineral elements in dry and lactating cows*: II. Magnesium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Summary

Statistical analyses were carried out on the data obtained under very strict conditions in metabolism stalls with 41 different rations fed to 127 adult non-pregnant dry cows, and with 14 other different rations fed to 35 adult non-pregnant lactating cows that had calved 2 to 6 months earlier and whose daily milk production ranged from 11 to 20 kg.

The correlation between faecal and urinary losses of magnesium, magnesium in milk, digestible magnesium, and magnesium balance and the other nutritive factors of the 55 above-mentioned experimental diets have been calculated.

The magnesium absorption is enhanced by increasing magnesium and calcium intake, while nitrogen and, to a lesser extent, fat, giving higher faecal losses, have an opposite effect. There is no influence at this level of lactating requirements.

The urinary losses of magnesium are not related to the magnesium intake and digestibility, and the balance is thus directly proportional to the digestible amounts. But this balance is decreased when the diet contains more dry matter or energy, to the benefit of urine in dry cows. We were not able to determine whether this balance reduction also benefits the milk production in the lactating cows.

Our results demonstrate that the faecal endogenous losses of magnesium can be highly variable.

The balance of magnesium is frequently but not inevitably negative in cows with a daily milk production of 11–20 kg.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allcroft, W. M. (1947). Seasonal hypomagnesaemia of the bovine without clinical symptoms. Vet. J. 103, 75.Google ScholarPubMed
Alloboft, W. M. & Green, H. H. (1938). Blood calcium and magnesium of the cow in health and disease. Biochem. J. 28, 2220.Google Scholar
Bartlett, S., Brown, B. B., Foot, A. S., Head, M. J., Line, C, Rook, J. A. F., Rowland, S. J. & Zundel, G. (1957). Field investigations into hypomagnesaemia in dairy cattle, with particular reference to changes in the concentration of blood constituents during the early grazing period. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S., Brown, B. B., Foot, A. S., Rowland, S. J., Allcroft, R. & Parr, W. H. (1954). The influence of fertilizer treatment of grassland on the incidence of hypomagnesaemia in milking cows. Br. Vet. J. 110, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Sharman, G. A. M. (1955). Hypomagnesaemic tetany in beef cattle. Vet. Rec. 67, 108.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. W., Huffman, C. F. & Robinson, C. S. (1935). Tetany produced by a ration of milk, or milk with various supplements. J. biol. Chem. 108, 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ender, F., Dishington, I. W. & Helgebostad, A. (1957). The magnesium problem in relation to the tetany paresis syndrome in dairy cows. Nord. VetMed. 9, 881.Google Scholar
Field, A. C. (1962). Studies on magnesium in ruminant nutrition. (Balance trials on sheep given different amounts of grass nuts.) Br. J. Nutr. 16, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, A. C.Mccallum, J. W. & Butler, E. J. (1958). Studies on magnesium in ruminant nutrition. (Balance experiments on sheep with herbage from fields associated with lactation tetany and from control pasture.) Br. J. Nutr. 12, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, A., Delis, W. B., Hemkes, O. J. & Van Es, A. J. H. (1961). Hypomagnesaemia in milking cows: Intake and utilization of magnesium from herbage by laotating cows. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 9, 134.Google Scholar
Kemp, A., Deijs, W. B. & Kluvers, E. (1966). Influence of higher fatty acids on the availability of magnesium in milking cows. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 14, 290.Google Scholar
Moine, G. (1936). La tétanie chez les jeunes bovidés. Rec. Med. Vet. 112, 397.Google Scholar
Paquay, R., Lomba, F., & Lousse, A. & Bienfet, V., (1968). Statistical research on the fate of dietary mineral elements in dry and lactating cows. I. Calcium. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, F. C. & Armour, J. (1958). Hypomagnesaemia in calves in Nigeria. Vet. Rec. 70, 912.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Balch, C. C. (1958). Magnesium metabolism in the dairy cows: metabolism during the spring grazing season. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 51, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Campling, R. C. (1962). Magnesium metabolism in the dairy cow. IV. The availability of the magnesium in various feedingstuffs. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 59, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Storry, J. E. (1962). Magnesium in the nutrition of farm animals. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 32, 1055.Google ScholarPubMed
Sjollema, B. (1935). Kalver tetanie. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 62, 343.Google Scholar
Van Der Horst, C. J. G. (1960). Balance experiments with milking cows. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 85, 1060.Google Scholar
Van Schouwbroek, F. W. (1958). Onderzoek naar het magnesiumgehalte van het bloedserum van het melk gevoerende slachtkalveren. Vlaams diergeneesk. Tijdschr. 27, 125.Google Scholar