Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:01:30.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solar radiation interception and utilization by chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) crops in northern Syria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Hughes ,
J. D. H. Keatinge ,
P. J. M. Cooper  and
N. F. Dee
G. Hughes
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland
J. D. H. Keatinge
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
P. J. M. Cooper
Affiliation:
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria
N. F. Dee
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An analysis of chickpea experiments carried out in northern Syria during the 1980–1 and 1981–2 growing seasons showed that both intercepted solar radiation and its rate of conversion to dry matter were variable components of dry-matter production. Among the sources of variation in the experiments, the most important factor affecting both interception and utilization of solar radiation was site. Winter planting also led to increased solar radiation interception and utilization. Used in conjunction with chickpea lines resistant to blight, winter planting seems likely to lead to increased productivity. In higher rainfall areas, where the crop is usually grown, such an increase would be of commercial significance. In drier areas, winter planting would enable the cultivation of chickpea as a subsistence crop.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 419 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. J. & Scott, R. K. (1980). An analysis of growth of the potato crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 583–606.Google Scholar
Cooper, P. J. M., Hebblethwaite, P. D., Campbell, G. S. & Heath, M. C. (1986). Rainfed production of food legumes: factors affecting water use efficiency and their measurement. Proceedings of the International Food Legume Research Conference on Pea, Lentil, Faba Bean and Chickpea. 6–1107 1986. Spokane, Washington, U.S.A. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Dennett, M. D., Keatinge, J. D. H. & Rodgers, J. A. (1984). A comparison of rainfall regimes at six sites in northern Syria. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 31, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manual, Oenstat (1983). Genstat, a General Statistical Program. Release 4.04. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Harris, H. C. (1979). Some aspects of the agroclimatology of West Asia and North Africa. In Food Legume Improvement and Development (ed. Hawtin, G. C. and Chancellor, G. J.), pp. 7–14. Ottawa, Canada: The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas and The International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. & Keatinge, J. D. H. (1983). Solar radiation interception, dry matter production and yield in pigeonpea (Gajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh). Field Crops Research 6, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Center For Agricultural Research In The Dry Areas (1983). Annual Report 1982. Aleppo, Syria: The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.Google Scholar
Keatinge, J. D. H. & Cooper, P. J. M. (1983). Kabuli chickpea as a winter-sown crop in northern Syria: moisture relations and crop productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 281, 277–294.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. & Elston, J. (1983). Performance and productivity of foliage in the field. In The Growth and Functioningof Leaves (ed. Dale, J. E. and Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 449–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saxena, M. C. (1979). Some agronomic and physiological aspects of the important food legume crops in West Asia. In Food Legume Improvement and Development (ed. Hawtin, G. C. and Chancellor, G. J.), pp. 155–166. Ottawa, Canada: The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas and the International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, A. R. & Saxena, N. P. (1979). Growth and development of chickpeas under progressive moisture stress. In Stress Physiology in Crop Plants (ed. Mussell, H. and Staples, R.), pp. 466–483. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Shibles, R. M. & Weber, C. R. (1966). Interception of solar radiation and dry matter production by various soybean planting patterns. Crop Science 6, 55–59.Google Scholar
Singh, K. B. (1981). Yield potential of tall chickpeas at increased plant density. International Chickpea Nevisletter 4, 10–11.Google Scholar
Singh, K. B. & Hawtin, G. C. (1979). Winter planting. International Chickpea Newsletter 1, 4.Google Scholar
Singh, K. B., Reddy, M. V. & Nene, Y. L. (1981). Sources of resistance to Aschochyta blight of chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter 4, 16–17.Google Scholar
Turner, N. C. & Begg, J. E. (1981). Plant-water relations and adaptation to stress. In Soil Water and Nitrogen in Mediterranean-type Environments (ed. Monteith, J. and Webb, C.), pp. 97–131. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk.Google Scholar