Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:26:57.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the use of molassed wood pulp as a substitute for farm roughages in experimental rations for dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. F. Rook  and
R. C. Campling
J. A. F. Rook
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berks
R. C. Campling
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent investigations at this Institute, attempts have been made to devise for dairy cows a ration extremely low in magnesium to be used in fundamental studies of magnesium metabolism. All common farm roughages are moderately rich in magnesium, and wood pulp, which is low in this element, has been tested as a roughage for use in these experimental rations. American workers (Titus, 1926; Mead & Goss, 1935; Byers, Stanbus, Nelson, Brown, Davis & Gardiner, 1955; Matrone, Ramsey & Wise, 1957; Smith, McLaren, Anderson, Welch & Campbell, 1957; Ellis & Pfander, 1958; Williams, Musgrave, Schul & MacVicar, 1958) have previously used wood pulp as a substitute for roughage in the development of purified rations for cattle and sheep, and it was fed extensively as a substitute farm feedingstuff in Norway during the war years (1940–44)(Edin, Helleday & Nordfelt, 1941; Hvidsten, 1946). This note records some observations on the feeding of wood pulp, often as the sole roughage, to both dry and milking cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 1959 , pp. 330 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C., Bartlett, S. & Johnson, V. W. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Kelly, A. & Heim, G. (1951). Brit. J. Nutr. 5, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bahtlett, S., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. H., Stanbus, J. R., Nelson, W. O., Brown, R. E., Davis, C. L. & Gardiner, K. E. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1195.Google Scholar
Edin, H., Helleday, T. & Nordfelt, S. (1941). Lantbrukshogsh Husdjursforsoksanst. Rep. no. 6. Seen only in Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 15, 570.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Pfander, W. H. (1958). J. Nutr. 65, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvidsten, H. (1946). Norg. Landbrukshøisk. Beretn Forsøk. no. 60.Google Scholar
Matrone, G., Ramsey, H. A., Wise, G. H. (1957). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 95, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, S. W. & Goss, H. (1935). J. Dairy Sci. 18, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. S., McLaren, G. A., Anderson, G. C., Welch, J. A. & Campbell, C. D. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titus, W. H. (1926). Tech. Bull. New Mexico Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 153.Google Scholar
Tosic, J. (1949). Brit. J. Nutr. 3, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. F., Musgrave, S. D., Schuh, J. D. & MacVicar, R. W. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 349.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. K. & Briggs, C. A. E. (1955). J. Appl. Bad. 18, 294.Google Scholar