Article contents
The digestibility of straw after treatment with soda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2009
Extract
The use of straw as fodder is beset by the double difficulty that on the one hand its bulky character seriously limits the extent to which it can be consumed by the animal, whilst on the other hand its tough and fibrous nature entails such a heavy expenditure of energy to secure the high degree of comminution and further preparation essential for effective action of the digestive agents that only a comparatively small surplus of energy remains over to serve productive nutritional ends. Thus it was found by Kellner and Köhler in the case of oat straw that of the total energy contained in the straw only 35·8 per cent, was usefully digested, whilst only 12·9 per cent, could be applied after digestion to productive purposes. For wheat straw the corresponding proportions were 31·1 per cent, and 5·5 per cent, respectively. These may be contrasted with the proportions of 49 per cent, and 20·7 per cent, respectively found by the same observers for meadow hay; and the proportions of 74·9 per cent, and 45·9 per cent, respectively found by Armsby and Fries for maize meal.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1920
References
Page 437 note 2 Vide Armsby, , The Nutrition of Farm Animals, 1917, p. 660.Google Scholar
Page 438 note 1 For a summary of the developments of the process during the war cf. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture, 1919, 26, 15.Google Scholar
Page 440 note 1 These differ slightly from the averages given in a preliminary notice in the Journal of the Board of Agriculture, 1919, 26, 20, but the general conclusions there drawn are in no way affected by the changes.Google Scholar
Page 443 note 1 Die Theorie und Praxis der Strohaufschilessung (Paul Parey, Berlin, 1919).
Page 446 note 1 Journ. of Agric. Science, 1917, 8, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page 447 note 1 loc. cit.
Page 447 note 2 Die Ernährung der landw. Nutztiere, 1 Auf. p. 32.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by