Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:25:18.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urea phosphate and mono-ammonium phosphate as dietary supplements for sheep fed diets inadequate in phosphorus and nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Fishwick  and
R. G. Hemingway
G. Fishwick
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
R. G. Hemingway
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Growing wether sheep in metabolism cages were fed a low phosphorus diet (0–7 g P/day) and providing 16 g N/day supplemented with either urea phosphate, monoammonium phosphate or dicalcium phosphate and with appropriate additions of urea to give equivalent additional intakes of phosphorus (1–75 g P/day) and nitrogen (4–6 g N/day).

All three sources of phosphorus and nitrogen resulted in similar and significantly improved phosphorus and nitrogen retentions. There were also very similar effects on urine outputs of phosphorus and nitrogen and on the concentrations of phosphorus and urea in the blood of the sheep.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 139 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Cavell, A. J. (1955). The colorimetric determination of phosphorus in plant materials. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 6, 479–80.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Chops (1961). Bulletin no. 45, p. 142. Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley.Google Scholar
Duthie, I. F. (1959). A sheep metabolic cage for mineral balance and radioisotope experiments. Lab. Pract. 8, 408–14.Google Scholar
Fishwick, G. (1973). A simplified method for the collection of faeces in digestibility trials with sheep. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 24, 105–106.Google Scholar
Hemingway, R. G., MacPherson, A., Duthie, A. K. & Brown, N. A. (1968). The mineral composition of hay and silage grown in Scotland in relation to the A.R.C. standards for the mineral requirements of dairy cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 53—9.Google Scholar
Hemingway, R. G., Parkins, J. J. & Ritchie, N. S. (1972). Comparative effects of oral administration of urea-phosphate on the concentrations of ammonia and urea in the blood of sheep. Br. Vet. J. 128, lxxxii—lxxxiv.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. & McClure, K. E. (1964). In vitro and in vivocomparisons of the utilisation of urea, biuret and diammonium phosphate by sheep. J. anim. Sci. 23, 208–13.Google Scholar
Martin, A. K. (1966). Some errors in the determination of nitrogen retention of sheep by nitrogen balance studies. Br. J. Nutr. 20, 325–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltjen, R. R., Waller, G. R., Nelson, A. B. & Tillman, A. D. (1963). Ruminant studies with diammonium phosphate and urea. J. anim. Sci. 24, 36–42.Google Scholar
Perez, C. B., Warner, R. G. & Loosli, J. K. (1967). Evaluation of urea-phosphate as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 810–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, N. S., Parkins, J. J. & Hemingway, R. G. (1972). Urea phosphate. A dietary source of nonprotein nitrogen with low potential toxicity to ruminants. Bt. Vet. J. 128, ixxviii–ixxxi.Google ScholarPubMed
Russoff, L. L., Lovell, R. T. & Waters, W. H. (1962). Urea-phosphate as a source of phosphorus and nitrogen for growing dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 45, 675–76.Google Scholar
Schaadt, H. Jr, Johnson, R. R. & Moclure, K. E. (1966). Adaptation to and palatability of urea, biuret and diammonium phosphate as N.P.N. sources for ruminants. J. anim. Sci. 25, 73–77.Google Scholar