Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:31:28.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation of Certain Physical Characteristics of the Wheat Kernel to Milling Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. H. Bailey
C. H. Bailey
Affiliation:
(Division of Agricultural Chemistry, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St Paul, Minn.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kernel volume, because of its relation to the ratio of endosperm to non-endosperm structures, varies directly with the potential flour yield when comparisons are restricted to the same type or variety of wheat.

Accurate determination of kernel density must include the complete removal of all mechanically held air.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 1916 , pp. 432 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 432 note 1 Hunt, Cereals in America, p. 21, New York, 1908.Google Scholar

page 432 note 2 Brenohley, Ann. Bot. 23, 117–139, 1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 435 note 1 Bailey, Canadian Miller and Cerealist, vol. VI. pp. 74–75, 1914Google Scholar

page 435 note 2 Nowacki, Untersuchungen über das Reifen des Getreides, Halle, 1870.Google Scholar

page 435 note 3 Hackel, The True Grasses. Translation by Lamson-Scribner and Southworth, New York, 1890.Google Scholar

page 435 note 4 Pagnoul, Ann. Agron. vol. XIV. pp. 262–272, 1888.Google Scholar

page 435 note 5 Wollny, Forsch. a, d. Gebiete Agrikulturphysik, vol. IX. pp. 207–216, 1886.Google Scholar

page 437 note 1 Marek, Landw. Zeit. f. Westfalen u. Lippe, p. 362, 1875.Google Scholar

page 437 note 2 Kornicke, and Werner, Handbuch d. Getreidebaues, Berlin, 1884.Google Scholar

page 437 note 3 Lloyd, Amer. Journ. Pharm. vol. LXVI. pp. 413–419, 1894.Google Scholar

page 437 note 4 Pammel, and Stewart, Iowa Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 25, pp. 26–31, 1894.Google Scholar

page 437 note 5 Lyon, U.S. Bur. Plant Ind. Bul No. 78, 1905.Google Scholar

page 437 note 6 Cobb, Agr. Gaz. New South Woles, vol. xv. p. 512, 1904.Google Scholar

page 437 note 7 Lyon, and Keyser, Nebraska Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 89, 1905.Google Scholar

page 437 note 8 Roberts, Kansas Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 156, 1908.Google Scholar

page 437 note 9 Roberts, Kansas Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 170, 1910.Google Scholar

page 437 note 10 Willard, and Swanson, Kansas Exp. Sta, Bul. No, 177,. 1911.Google Scholar

page 438 note 1 Bailey, and Thomas, U.S. Bur. Plant Ind. Circular No. 99, 1912Google Scholar