Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:15:35.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal location of set-aside areas to reduce nitrogen pollution: a modelling study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2019

L. Casal ,
P. Durand ,
N. Akkal-Corfini ,
C. Benhamou ,
F. Laurent ,
J. Salmon-Monviola  and
F. Vertès
L. Casal
Affiliation:
UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA 35000 Rennes, France
P. Durand*
Affiliation:
UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA 35000 Rennes, France
N. Akkal-Corfini
Affiliation:
UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA 35000 Rennes, France
C. Benhamou
Affiliation:
UMR ECOSYS, AgroParisTech, INRA 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
F. Laurent
Affiliation:
Arvalis institut du végétal, 91720 Boigneville, France
J. Salmon-Monviola
Affiliation:
UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA 35000 Rennes, France
F. Vertès
Affiliation:
UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA 35000 Rennes, France
*
Author for correspondence: P. Durand, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distributed models and a good knowledge of the catchment studied are required to assess mitigation measures for nitrogen (N) pollution. A set of alternative scenarios (change of crop management practices and different strategies of landscape management, especially different sizes and distribution of set-aside areas) were simulated with a fully distributed model in a small agricultural catchment. The results show that current practices are close to complying with current regulations, which results in a limited effect of the implementation of best crop management practices. The location of set-aside zones is more important than their size in decreasing nitrate fluxes in stream water. The most efficient location is the lower parts of hillslopes, combining the dilution effect due to the decrease of N input per unit of land and the interception of nitrate transferred by sub-surface flows. The main process responsible for the interception effect is probably uptake by grassland and retention in soils since the denitrification load tends to decrease proportionally to N input and, for the scenarios considered, is lower in the interception scenarios than in the corresponding dilution zones.

Keywords

Best management practiceslandscape managementnitrate pollutionriparian zonescenario analysisTNT2 model
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 9 , November 2018 , pp. 1090 - 1102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arheimer, B, Andersson, L, Larsson, M, Lindström, G, Olsson, J and Pers, BC (2004) Modelling diffuse nutrient flow in eutrophication control scenarios. Water Science and Technology 49, 37–45.Google Scholar
Aubert, AH, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Gruau, G, Akkal, N, Faucheux, M, Fauvel, Y, Grimaldi, C, Hamon, Y, Jaffrézic, A, Lecoz-Boutnik, M, Molénat, J, Petitjean, P, Ruiz, L and Merot, P (2013) Solute transport dynamics in small, shallow groundwater-dominated agricultural catchments: insights from a high-frequency, multisolute 10 year-long monitoring study. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17, 1379–1391.Google Scholar
Bagoulla, C, Chevassus-Lozza, E, Daniel, K and Gaigné, C (2010) Regional production adjustment to import competition: evidence from the French agro-industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92, 1040–1050.Google Scholar
Barnes, AP, Willock, J, Hall, C and Toma, L (2009) Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland. Agricultural Water Management 96, 1715–1722.Google Scholar
Beaujouan, V, Durand, P, Ruiz, L, Aurousseau, P and Cotteret, G (2002) A hydrological model dedicated to topography-based simulation of nitrogen transfer and transformation: rationale and application to the geomorphology-denitrification relationship. Hydrological Processes 16, 493–507.Google Scholar
Beff, L, Morvan, T and Lambert, Y (2016) Web réseau Mh. Available at http://geowww.agrocampus-ouest.fr/portails/portail.php?portail=mh (Accessed 8 August 2018).Google Scholar
Benhamou, C, Salmon-Monviola, J, Durand, P, Grimaldi, C and Merot, P (2013) Modeling the interaction between fields and a surrounding hedgerow network and its impact on water and nitrogen flows of a small watershed. Agricultural Water Management 121, 62–72.Google Scholar
Beven, KJ (1997) Distributed Hydrological Modelling: Applications of the Topmodel Concept. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Billen, G, Beusen, A, Bouwman, L and Garnier, J (2010) Anthropogenic nitrogen autotrophy and heterotrophy of the world's watersheds: past, present, and future trends. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 24, article GB0A11. Available at http://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003702. 12p.Google Scholar
Blanco-Canqui, H, Gantzer, C, Anderson, S, Alberts, E and Thompson, A (2004) Grass barrier and vegetative filter strip effectiveness in reducing runoff, sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorus loss. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 1670–1678.Google Scholar
Brisson, N, Gary, C, Justes, E, Roche, R, Mary, B, Ripoche, D, Zimmer, D, Sierra, J, Bertuzzi, P, Burger, P, Bussière, F, Cabidoche, YM, Cellier, P, Debaeke, P, Gaudillère, JP, Hénault, C, Maraux, F, Seguin, B and Sinoquet, H (2003) An overview of the crop model stics. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 309–332.Google Scholar
Buckley, C and Carney, P (2013) The potential to reduce the risk of diffuse pollution from agriculture while improving economic performance at farm level. Environmental Science and Policy 25, 118–126.Google Scholar
Burel, F and Baudry, J (2003) Landscape Ecology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Burt, T, Pinay, G and Sabater, S (2010) What do we still need to know about the ecohydrology of riparian zones? Ecohydrology: Ecosystems, Land and Water Process Interactions, Ecohydrogeomorphology 3, 373–377.Google Scholar
Canevet, C (1992) Le Modèle Agricole Breton: Histoire et Géographie d'une Révolution Agro-alimentaire. Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Carpenter, SR, Caraco, NF, Correll, DL, Howarth, RW, Sharpley, AN and Smith, VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8, 559–568.Google Scholar
Chaplot, V, Saleh, A, Jaynes, DB and Arnold, J (2004) Predicting water, sediment and NO3-N loads under scenarios of land-use and management practices in a flat watershed. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 154, 271–293.Google Scholar
Cherry, KA, Shepherd, M, Withers, PJA and Mooney, SJ (2008) Assessing the effectiveness of actions to mitigate nutrient loss from agriculture: a review of methods. Science of the Total Environment 406, 1–23.Google Scholar
Clément, J-C, Pinay, G and Marmonier, P (2002) Seasonal dynamics of denitrification along topohydrosequences in three different riparian wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 1025–1037.Google Scholar
Curmi, P, Durand, P, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Mérot, P, Walter, C and Taha, A (1998) Hydromorphic soils, hydrology and water quality: spatial distribution and functional modelling at different scales. In Finke, PA, Bouma, J and Hoosbeek, MR (eds), Soil and Water Quality at Different Scales. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 80. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
Da Silva, VDePR, Silva, MT and De Souza, EP (2016) Influence of land use change on sediment yield: a case study of the sub-middle of the São Francisco River Basin. Engenharia Agrícola 36, 1005–1015.Google Scholar
Dalgaard, T, Bienkowski, JF, Bleeker, A, Dragosits, U, Drouet, JL, Durand, P, Frumau, A, Hutchings, NJ, Kedziora, A, Magliulo, V, Olesen, JE, Theobald, MR, Maury, O, Akkal, N and Cellier, P (2012) Farm nitrogen balances in six European landscapes as an indicator for nitrogen losses and basis for improved management. Biogeosciences (Online) 9, 5303–5321.Google Scholar
De Girolamo, AM and Lo Porto, A (2012) Land use scenario development as a tool for watershed management within the Rio Mannu Basin. Land Use Policy 29, 691–701.Google Scholar
Drouet, JL, Capian, N, Fiorelli, JL, Blanfort, V, Capitaine, M, Duretz, S, Gabrielle, B, Martin, R, Lardy, R, Cellier, P and Soussana, JF (2011) Sensitivity analysis for models of greenhouse gas emissions at farm level. Case study of N2O emissions simulated by the CERES-EGC model. Environmental Pollution 159, 3156–3161.Google Scholar
Durand, P (2004) Simulating nitrogen budgets in complex farming systems using INCA: calibration and scenario analyses for the Kervidy catchment (W. France). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8, 793–802.Google Scholar
Durand, P, Moreau, P, Salmon-Monviola, J, Ruiz, L, Vertes, F and Gascuel-Odoux, C (2015) Modelling the interplay between nitrogen cycling processes and mitigation options in farming catchments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 153, 959–974.Google Scholar
Edwards-Jones, G (1993) Knowledge-based systems for crop protection: theory and practice. Crop Protection 12, 565–578.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018) The Nitrates Directive: Latest Commission Report and Staff Working Document on the Implementation of the Nitrates Directive. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-nitrates/index_en.html (Accessed 15 June 2018).Google Scholar
Farkas, C, Beldring, S, Bechmann, M and Deelstra, J (2013) Soil erosion and phosphorus losses under variable land use as simulated by the INCA-P model. Soil Use and Management 29, 124–137.Google Scholar
Ferrant, S, Oehler, F, Durand, P, Ruiz, L, Salmon-Monviola, J, Justes, E, Dugast, P, Probst, A, Probst, J-L and Sanchez-Perez, J-M (2011) Understanding nitrogen transfer dynamics in a small agricultural catchment: comparison of a distributed (TNT2) and a semi distributed (SWAT) modeling approaches. Journal of Hydrology 406, 1–15.Google Scholar
Ferrant, S, Durand, P, Justes, E, Probst, J-L and Sanchez-Perez, J-M (2013) Simulating the long term impact of nitrate mitigation scenarios in a pilot study basin. Agricultural Water Management 124, 85–96.Google Scholar
Grizzetti, B, Bouraoui, F and De Marsily, G (2008) Assessing nitrogen pressures on European surface water. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22, GB4023. Available at http://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003085.Google Scholar
Haag, D and Kaupenjohann, M (2001) Landscape fate of nitrate fluxes and emissions in Central Europe – a critical review of concepts, data, and models for transport and retention. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86, 1–21.Google Scholar
Houot, S, Pons, M-N, Pradel, M and Tibi, A (2016) Recyclage de Déchets Organiques en Agriculture: Effets Agronomiques et Environnementaux de leur Épandage. Versailles, France: Editions Quae.Google Scholar
Jakeman, AJ and Letcher, RA (2003) Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environmental Modelling and Software 18, 491–501.Google Scholar
Kay, P, Grayson, R, Phillips, M, Stanley, K, Dodsworth, A, Hanson, A, Walker, A, Foulger, M, McDonnell, I and Taylor, S (2012) The effectiveness of agricultural stewardship for improving water quality at the catchment scale: experiences from an NVZ and ECSFDI watershed. Journal of Hydrology 422–423, 10–16.Google Scholar
Kovar, P, Kovarova, M, Bunce, R, Ineson, P and Brabec, E (1996) Role of hedgerows as nitrogen sink in agricultural landscape of Wensleydale, Northern England. Preslia 68, 273–284.Google Scholar
Krugman, P (1998) What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, 7–17.Google Scholar
Laurent, F and Ruelland, D (2011) Assessing impacts of alternative land use and agricultural practices on nitrate pollution at the catchment scale. Journal of Hydrology 409, 440–450.Google Scholar
Molénat, J, Durand, P, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Davy, P and Gruau, G (2002) Mechanisms of nitrate transfer from soil to stream in an agricultural watershed of French Brittany. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 133, 161–183.Google Scholar
Molénat, J, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Davy, P and Durand, P (2005) How to model shallow water-table depth variations: the case of the Kervidy-Naizin catchment, France. Hydrological Processes 19, 901–920.Google Scholar
Molénat, J, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Aquilina, L and Ruiz, L (2013) Use of gaseous tracers (CFCs and SF6) and transit-time distribution spectrum to validate a shallow groundwater transport model. Journal of Hydrology 480, 1–9.Google Scholar
Moreau, P, Ruiz, L, Raimbault, T, Vertes, F, Cordier, MO, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Masson, V, Salmon-Monviola, J and Durand, P (2012) Modeling the potential benefits of catch-crop introduction in fodder crop rotations in a Western Europe landscape. Science of the Total Environment 437, 276–284.Google Scholar
Moreau, P, Viaud, V, Parnaudeau, V, Salmon-Monviola, J and Durand, P (2013) An approach for global sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model to spatial inputs and parameters: a case study of an agro-hydrological model. Environmental Modelling and Software 47, 74–87.Google Scholar
Nash, JE and Sutcliffe, JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10, 282–290.Google Scholar
Oehler, F, Durand, P, Bordenave, P, Saadi, Z and Salmon-Monviola, J (2009) Modelling denitrification at the catchment scale. Science of the Total Environment 407, 1726–1737.Google Scholar
Oenema, O, Witzke, HP, Klimont, Z, Lesschen, JP and Velthof, GL (2009) Integrated assessment of promising measures to decrease nitrogen losses from agriculture in EU-27. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 133, 280–288.Google Scholar
Payraudeau, S, Van Der Werf, HMG and Vertes, F (2007) Analysis of the uncertainty associated with the estimation of nitrogen losses from farming systems. Agricultural Systems 94, 416–430.Google Scholar
Peyraud, JL, Cellier, P, Aarts, F, Béline, F, Bockstaller, C, Bourblanc, M, Delaby, L, Dourmad, JY, Dupraz, P, Durand, P, Faverdin, P, Fiorelli, JL, Gaigné, C, Kuikman, PJ, Langlais, A, Le Goffe, P, Lescoat, P, Morvan, T, Nicourt, C, Parnaudeau, V, Rochette, P, Vertès, F, Veysset, P, Réchauchère, O and Donnars, C (2014) Nitrogen flows and livestock farming: lessons and perspectives. Advances in Animal Biosciences 5, 68–71.Google Scholar
Qu, HJ and Kroeze, C (2012) Nutrient export by rivers to the coastal waters of China: management strategies and future trends. Regional Environmental Change 12, 153–167.Google Scholar
Salmon-Monviola, J, Moreau, P, Benhamou, C, Durand, P, Merot, P, Oehler, F and Gascuel-Odoux, C (2013) Effect of climate change and increased atmospheric CO2 on hydrological and nitrogen cycling in an intensive agricultural headwater catchment in western France. Climatic Change 120, 433–447.Google Scholar
Schoumans, OF, Chardon, WJ, Bechmann, M, Gascuel-Odoux, C, Hofman, G, Kronvang, B, Litaor, I, Lo Porto, A, Newell, P and Rubaek, GH (2011) Mitigation Options for Reducing Nutrient Emissions from Agriculture : a Study amongst European Member States of Cost Action 869. Alterra Report 2141. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Alterra.Google Scholar
Schulz, JJ and Schröder, B (2017) Identifying suitable multifunctional restoration areas for forest landscape restoration in Central Chile. Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) 8, e01644. Available at http://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1644.Google Scholar
Shaviv, A and Mikkelsen, RL (1993) Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation – a review. Fertilizer Research 35, 1–12.Google Scholar
Tete, E, Viaud, V and Walter, C (2015) Organic carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a poorly-drained mineral soil under transient waterlogged conditions: an incubation experiment. European Journal of Soil Science 66, 427–437.Google Scholar
Tian, Y, Huang, Z and Xiao, W (2010) Reductions in non-point source pollution through different management practices for an agricultural watershed in the three gorges reservoir area. Journal of Environmental Sciences 22, 184–191.Google Scholar
Vache, KB, Eilers, JM and Santelmann, MV (2002) Water quality modeling of alternative agricultural scenarios in the US corn belt. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38, 773–787.Google Scholar
Velthof, GL, Lesschen, JP, Webb, J, Pietrzak, S, Miatkowski, Z, Pinto, M, Kros, J and Oenema, O (2014) The impact of the nitrates directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000–2008. Science of the Total Environment 468–469, 1225–1233.Google Scholar
Viaud, V, Durand, P, Merot, P, Sauboua, E and Saadi, Z (2005) Modeling the impact of the spatial structure of a hedge network on the hydrology of a small catchment in a temperate climate. Agricultural Water Management 74, 135–163.Google Scholar
Viaud, V, Santillàn-Carvantes, P, Akkal-Corfini, N, Le Guillou, C, Prévost-Bouré, NC, Ranjard, L and Menasseri-Aubry, S (2018) Landscape-scale analysis of cropping system effects on soil quality in a context of crop-livestock farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 265, 166–177.Google Scholar
Wallace, MT and Moss, JE (2002) Farmer decision-making with conflicting goals: a recursive strategic programming analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53, 82–100.Google Scholar
Worrall, F, Spencer, E and Burt, TP (2009) The effectiveness of nitrate vulnerable zones for limiting surface water nitrate concentrations. Journal of Hydrology 370, 21–28.Google Scholar
Zammit, C, Sivapalan, M, Kelsey, P and Viney, NR (2005) Modelling the effects of land-use modifications to control nutrient loads from an agricultural catchment in Western Australia. Ecological Modelling 187, 60–70.Google Scholar