Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:12:50.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: a further evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. B. Austin ,
Margaret A. Ford  and
C. L. Morgan
R. B. Austin
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Plant Science Research (Cambridge Laboratory), Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2JB
Margaret A. Ford
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Plant Science Research (Cambridge Laboratory), Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2JB
C. L. Morgan
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Plant Science Research (Cambridge Laboratory), Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2JB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments comparing 13 winter wheat varieties representing very old, old, intermediate and modern groups were carried out over three seasons. The experimental sites were on soils of high fertility and weeds, diseases and pests were controlled by applications of proprietary agrochemicals. Lodging was prevented by supporting the plants with coarse-mesh netting.

The average yield of all varieties over the three harvest years 1984, 1985 and 1986 was 7·7 t/ha (at 15% moisture content). Compared with the very old varieties which were grown by farmers during the 19th century, the modern varieties gave 59% more grain, had 14% more ears/m2 and 30% more grains per ear, but a similar mean grain mass. The modern varieties yielded slightly more biomass (total above-ground dry matter at harvest), were much shorter and reached anthesis about 6 days earlier than the older ones. In 1984, when the yields were greater than in 1985 and 1986, the yield advantage of the modern varieties was more in percentage and absolute terms than in the other years. Also, in 1984, the differences between the very old and the modern varieties in biomass was the greatest.

The genetic gain in yield measured in these experiments is compared with those estimated for other countries and reasons for the variation are discussed.

Type
Review
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 112 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 295 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, R. B. (1988). A different ideotype for each environment? In Cereal Breeding Related to Integrated Cereal Production (ed. Jorna, M. L. and Slootmaker, L. A. J.), pp. 47–60. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L. & Taylor, M. (1980). Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Edge and neighbour effects in cereal yield trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 731–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. S., Shroyer, J. P., Lui, B.-H., Sears, R. G. & Martin, T. J. (1988). Genetic improvement in agronomic traits of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Science 28, 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckerd, E. L., Busch, R. H. & Koford, D. (1985). Physiological aspects of spring wheat improvement. In Exploitation of Physiological and Genetic Variability to Enhance Crop Productivity (ed. Harper, J. E., Schrader, L. E. and Howell, R. W.), pp. 46–54. Maryland: American Society of Plant Physiologists.Google Scholar
Feyerherm, A. M., Paulsen, G. M. & Sebaugh, J. L. (1984). Contribution of genetic improvement to recent wheat yield increases in the USA. Agronomy Journal 76, 985–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerherm, A. M. & Paulsen, G. M. (1981). Development of a wheat prediction model. Agronomy Journal 73, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, M. A., Austin, R. B., Gregory, R. S. & Morgan, C. L. (1984). A comparison of the grain and biomass yields of winter wheat, rye and triticale. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 395–403.Google Scholar
Jensen, N. F. (1978). Limits to growth in world food production. Science 201, 317–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kepton, R. A. (1982). Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlon, P. J. (1985). Annual Report of ICRISAT/Burkina Economics Program 1985. Ouagadougou: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics [mimeographed].Google Scholar
Riggs, T. J., Hanson, P. R., Start, N. D., Miles, D. M., Morgan, C. L. & Ford, M. A. (1981). Comparison of spring barley varieties grown in England and Wales between 1880 and 1980. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. W. (1984). Genetic contributions to yield gains in wheat. In Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants, pp. 89–101. Crop Science of America, Special publication No. 7.Google Scholar
Waddington, S. R., Ransom, J. K., Osmanzai, M. & Saunders, D. A. (1986). Improvement in the yield potential of bread wheat adapted to north west Mexico. Crop Science 26, 699–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar