Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:39:38.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field measurements of water use for irrigation control in Kenya coffee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. C. Pereira
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya

Extract

The paper presents the results of 10 years of soil moisture studies in arabica coffee in high altitude tropical conditions. Very deep soils and contrasting wet and dry seasons give unusually favourable conditions for soil moisture measurements.

Volumetric measurements on soil cores are reported for 10 ft. depth of soil, which is shown to include most of the root system of arabica coffee, and holds 48 in. of water under field conditions when active drainage has ceased. This is shown to correspond to a soil moisture tension of 1/3 atm. Of the 48 in. of water only 12 are available to plants. Wilting points determined by sunflower seedlings on soil samples to 15 ft. depth are shown to agree well with field sampling under wilting conditions in coffee plantations.

A series of seasonal factors relating the water use of the coffee crop to the readings of an evaporation pan are presented, and their application over 6 years is shown to check with soil sampling data within the limits of sampling error. This method is proposed for control of supplementary irrigation under conditions of limited water supply, but a distillation-type radiation integrator can with advantage replace the evaporation pan.

The balance of the hydrological equation for this crop is demonstrated in each of the 6 years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashcroft, G. & Taylor, S. A. (1953). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 17, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, E. A. (1955). International Association of Hydrology, Rome Conference, 3, paper 58.Google Scholar
Blaney, H. F. & Criddle, W. D. (1950). U.S. Dep. Agric, S.C.S., T.P. 96.Google Scholar
Bouyoucos, J. G. (1950). Agron. J. 42, 104–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouyoucos, J. G. & Mick, A. H. (1940). Mich. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 172.Google Scholar
Colman, E. A. (1947). Soil Sci. 63, 277–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewart, G. Y. (1951). Agric. Engr. 32, 149–51Google Scholar
Furr, J. R. & Reeve, J. O. (1945). J. Agric. Res. 71, 149–70Google Scholar
Gunn, D. L., Kirk, R. L. & Waterhouse, J. A. H. (1945). J. Exp. Biol. 22, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. A. & Wallis, J. A. N. (1957) E. Afr. Agric. J. 22, 186.Google Scholar
McNaughtan, F. (1933). Unpublished work.Google Scholar
Nutman, F. J. (1933). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 1, 271, 285.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Proc. Boy. Soc. A, 193, 120–45.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1950). Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 76, 372–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 286–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, H. C. (1951). J. Soil Sci. 2, 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, H. C. (1954). Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Soil. Sci. 3, 455.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, H. C. (1957). E. Afr. Agric. J. 22, 188.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. & Jones, P. A. (1954). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 22, 231.Google Scholar
Rayner, R. W. (1945). Kenya Dept. Agric. Ann. Rept. (unpublished).Google Scholar
Richards, L. A. (1942). Soil Sci. 53, 241–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, L. A. & Weaver, L. R. (1943). Soil Sci. 56, 331–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurling, M. B. (1950). J. Dept. Agric. S. Aust. 54, 62.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). Geogr. Rev. 38, 5595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trench, A. D. Le P. & Beckley, V. A. (1935). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 3, 203.Google Scholar
White, R. G. (1946). Agric. Engr. 27, 21.Google Scholar