Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:52:59.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of protein level in creep feed on the growth rate and body composition of sucking pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Anthea W. W. Whitelaw ,
F. W. H. Elsley ,
A. S. Jones  and
A. W. Boyne
Anthea W. W. Whitelaw
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
F. W. H. Elsley
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
A. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
A. W. Boyne
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three creep feeds containing 14, 18 and 22% crude protein of similar protein quality (as measured by total lysine and total methionine plus cystino content) but with similar levels of other nutrients were given ad libitum to 210 pigs, the progeny of thirty large White sows from 21 to 56 days old.

2. At 21 days old, each litter was reduced to seven piglets by killing one, two or three pigs at random. The whole pig was analysed for protein, ether extract, ash and dry matter.

3. At 56 days, 3 further pigs were killed in each litter and analysed in a similar manner.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , April 1966 , pp. 203 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aumaitre, A. & Salmon-Legagneur, E. (1961).Ann. Zootech. 10, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumaitrb, A., Jouandet, C. & Salmon-Legagneur, E. (1964). Ann. Zootech. 13, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, D. E., Ullbey, D. E. & Terrill, S. W. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beroe, S. & Isdkebo, T. (1953). Meld. Norg. Land-brhoisk, 33, 389.Google Scholar
Blair, K. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, I. J. & Zwiep, I. N. (1955). Voeding, 16, 147.Google Scholar
Ellinger, G. M. (1965). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Harrington, G. & Pomeroy, R. W. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (1956). Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Nutrition, Tech. Comm. no. 19.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, H. D., Jensen, A. H., Terrell, S. W., Becker, D. E. & Norton, H. W. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, R. M., Lodge, G. A., Lucas, I. A. M., MACPHERSON, R. M. & Macpherson, S. J. (1959). Unpublished data, Rowett Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L. E. & Crampton, E. W. (1958). Canad. J Anim. Sci. 38, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A. (1958). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. & Mcdonald, I. (1959). Anim. Prod. 1, 139.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Mcdonald, I. & Macpherson, R. M. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. & Lodge, G. A. (1961). Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Nutrition, Tech. Comm. no. 22.Google Scholar
Moore, S., Spackman, D. M. & Stein, W. W. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N.R.C. (1959). National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council, Nutrient Requirements of Swine, Pub. 1192.Google Scholar
Rutledge, E. A., Hanson, L. E. & Meade, R. J. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, R. F., Thomas, M. C. & Price, D. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, S. W., Meade, R. J., Nelson, T. S. & Becker, D. E. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 777, Proc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar