Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:50:24.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Household Nutrient Demand: Use of Characteristics Theory and a Common Attribute Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

David B. Eastwood ,
John R. Brooker  and
Danny E. Terry
David B. Eastwood
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee
John R. Brooker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee
Danny E. Terry
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Central Missouri State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A characteristics model, which assumes goods generate a common set of attributes but no unique attribute, is described. The model yielded two equations which were estimated. One was a set of hedonic price equations in which the price paid for each food purchased was a function of imputed attribute prices. This set of equations was estimated at the household level. Nutrient demand equations were estimated across households. Imputed prices, income, and household characteristics including location, size, education, age distribution, and race affected nutrient demand levels.

Keywords

attributecharacteristichedonicpricenutrient demandutility
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1986 , pp. 235 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, John L. and Daniel, Raymond. “Impacts of Socioeconomic Factors on Consumption of Selected Food Nutrients in the United States,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58,1(1976):31–38.Google Scholar
Blaylock, James and Burbee, Clark. Consumer Demand for Eggs and Market Implications, USDA, ERS, Service Staff Report AGES850924, 1985.Google Scholar
Burk, Marguerite C. Influences of Economic and Social Factors on U. S. Food. Consumption, Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1961.Google Scholar
Chavas, Jean-Paul and Keplinger, Keith O.. “Impact of Domestic Food Programs on Nutrient Intake of Low-Income Persons in the United States,” So. J. Agr. Econ., 15,1(1983):155–163.Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi. “Hedonic Price Indexes for Automobiles: An Econometric Analysis of Quality Change,” Price Indexes and Quality Change: Studies in New Methods of Measurement, Griliches, Zvi (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1971.Google Scholar
Hanemann, Michael W. “Quality and Demand Analysis,” in New Directions in Econometric Modeling and Forecasting in U. S. Agriculture, Rausser, Gordon C. (ed.), Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H. “Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed,” Rev. Econ. Stud., 19(1951–1952):155–164.Google Scholar
Kravis, Irving B. and Lipsey, Robert E.. “International Price Comparison,” Price Indexes and Quality Change: Studies in New Methods of Measurement, Griliches, Zvi (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1971.Google Scholar
Ladd, George W. “Survey of Promising Developments in Demand Analysis: Economics of Product Characteristics,” New Direction in Econometric Modeling and Forecasting in U. S. Agriculture, Rausser, Gordon C. (ed.), Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Ladd, George W. and Suvannunt, Veraphol. “A Model of Consumer Goods Characteristics,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58,3(1976):504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, George W. and Zober, Martin. “Model of Consumer Reaction to Product Characteristics,” J. Cons. Res., 4(1977):89–101.Google Scholar
LaFrance, Jeffrey T. “The Economics of Nutrient Content and Consumer Demand for Food,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1983.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Kevin J. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” J. Pol. Econ., 74(1966):132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Kevin J.. Consumer Demand: A New Approach, Columbia University Press, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Morgan, Karen Johnson. “An Hedonic Index for Breakfast Cereals,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1977.Google Scholar
Raunikar, Robert, Purcell, J. C., and Elrod, J. C.. Consumption and Expenditure Analysis for Fruits and Vegetables in Atlanta, Georgia, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 53; Experiment, Georgia, 1966.Google Scholar
Scearce, W. K. and Jensen, R. B.. “Food Stamp Program Effects on Availability of Food Nutrients for Low Income Families in the Southern Region of the U. S.,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 11,1(1979):113–120.Google Scholar
Smallwood, David M. and Blaylock, James R.. Food Spending in American Households, 1980-81, USDA, ERS Bulletin 731, 1985.Google Scholar
Suvannunt, Veraphol. “Measurement of Quantities and Prices of Product Qualities,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, 1973.Google Scholar
Terry, Danny E. “An Evaluation of Characteristic Theory: Implicit Prices and the Demand for Nutritional Attributes,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1985.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Consumer Nutrition Center, Human Nutrition Information Service, Food Consumption: Households in the United States, Spring, 1977, Nationwide Food Consumption Survey 1977-78, Report No. H-1, 1982.Google Scholar
Weimer, John. “Nutritional Labeling: The Unresolved Issues,” Nat. Food Rev., USDA, ESCS, NFR-11(1980):20–23.Google Scholar