Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T22:55:33.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Spatial Models to Improving the Efficiency of a Country Hog Marketing System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

John T. Haas*
Affiliation:
Farmer Cooperative Service of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

Extract

Most spatial equilibrium studies done in the past have focused on macro problems of an industry or a commodity. There are, however, important applications for spatial models in analyses of efficient resource use on the micro or firm level.

One important area of application is in analysis of the efficiency of single-firm marketing systems. Many cooperatives and other agribusiness firms have developed systems for marketing agricultural commodities or distributing farm supplies. These systems involve multiple assembly and distribution points, and often some processing function is performed between the points of origin and final destination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Dantzig, G.B.Programming of Interdependent Activities: Mathematical Model.Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. Edited by Koopmans, T. C.. Cowles Commission Monograph No. 13. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1951.Google Scholar
[2] Haas, John T.An Economic Analysis of the Effects of Optimizing Hog Shipment Patterns and Market Structure on the Efficiency of a Country Hog Marketing System.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 1972.Google Scholar
[3] King, Gordon A., and Logan, Samuel H.. “Optimum Location, Number and Size of Processing Plants with Raw Product and Final Product Shipments.Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 46, No. 1, Feb. 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar