Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:20:22.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roger Casement and the Congo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Extract

Roger Casement's role as Irish patriot has obscured his role as Congo reformer. Travelling in the interior of the Congo in 1903 as British consul, Casement gathered evidence that enabled the British government to attack the Congo State on grounds of maladministration. He did not however regard mere diplomatic action as sufficient to redress the wrongs of King Leopold's rubber trade. Convinced that only a humanitarian crusade could abolish the evils of the Leopoldian regime, Casement inspired E. D. Morel to found the Congo Reform Association. Through his dual capacity of civil servant and humanitarian, he attempted, in his own words, to choke off King Leopold ‘as a “helldog” is choked off’. His apocalyptic vision of evil in the Congo may have been exaggerated, but his influence was of the first magnitude in bringing about Belgium's annexation of the Congo in 1908.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Casement to Lansdowne, tel., 55 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

2 Pickersgill to Salisbury, 25 Jan. 1897, F.O. 63/1336.Google Scholar

3 Parliamentary Debates, 4th series, 45, 1897, c. 781.Google Scholar

4 Salisbury's minute of [?]2 Nov. 1896, F.O. 10/716.Google Scholar

5 E. D. Morel's unpublished history of the Congo Reform Association, Morel papers, London School of Economics.Google Scholar

6 The title of his book published in 1903.Google Scholar

7 Bourne, Fox to Morel, 21 Nov. 1903, Morel papers.Google Scholar

8 Farnall's minute on Fox Bourne to Salisbury, 27 March 1902, F.O. 10/773.Google Scholar

9 Sir Gosselin's, Martin minute of 21 May 1902, F.O. 10/773.Google Scholar

10 Lansdowne's minute on Gosselin's memorandum of 5 June 1902, F.O. 10/773.Google Scholar

11 1 June 1897, F.O. 10/731.Google Scholar

12 Salisbury's minute on Pickersgill's report of 2 June 1897, F.O. 10/731.Google Scholar

13 Salisbury's minute of 30 April 1900, F.O. 10/754.Google Scholar

14 Gosselin to Davidson, 10 May 1900, and Davidson to Gosselin, 16 May 1900, F.O. 10/754.Google Scholar

15 Cranborne's minute of 19 May 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

16 Davidson to Gosselin, 16 May 1903, F.O. 10/754.Google Scholar

17 Lansdowne to Dilke, 1 March 1902, Dilke papers, British Museum Add. MS. 43917.Google Scholar

18 Farnall's minute of 3 April on Fox Bourne to Salisbury, 27 March 1902, F.O. 10/773.Google Scholar

19 The debate in the House of Commons last May was the first fruits of his devoted labours', Morning Post, 24 March 1904.Google Scholar

20 Parliamentary Debates, 4th series, 122, 20 May 1903, c. 1298.Google Scholar

21 Ibid. c. 1304.

22 Ibid. c. 1332.

23 Slade, Ruth M., English-Speaking Missions in the Congo Independent State, 1878–1908 (Brussels, 1959), 273.Google Scholar

24 Farnall's minute of 5 June 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

25 Dilke to Morel, 20 June 1903, Morel papers; Slade, English-Speaking Missions, 274.Google Scholar

26 Farnall's minute on Plunkett to Salisbury, No. 164 Africa, 18 June 1900, F.O. 10/754.Google Scholar

27 Farnall's minute on Addison's memorandum of 11 May 1903, F.O. 10/803.Google Scholar

28 See the memorandum of 10 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

29 Lansdowne's minute on Fox Bourne to F.O., 5 May 1903, F.O. 10/803.Google Scholar

30 These cases had become so numerous by 1903 that the Foreign Office decided to address a strong representation to the Congo administration; ‘I hope we are collecting materials for an indictment’, Lansdowne wrote shortly before the House of Commons debate in 1903 (Lansdowne's minute on Fox Bourne to F.O., May 1903, F.O. 10/803). The most important instance of maltreatment which could be proved was that of a British subject called Mrs Meyer, who had been robbed by the Congo police and then had her shop looted while under arrest. Her business was entirely ruined, and, after waiting in vain for her case to be settled in Boma, she returned to her home in Sierra Leone. Similar incidents were to form the basis of the Foreign Office's attack against the Congo State, but they were discarded in favour of Casement's report.Google Scholar

31 Casement exaggerated in 1909 when he recalled the origins of his journey: ‘I went up river, remember, … not as a result of any order of theirs. I had started and was almost at Stanley Pool with all my measures prepared when they telegraphed out suggesting that in view of the debate of May 1903 I might start.’ (Casement to Morel, private and confid., 29 Jan. 1909, Morel papers.) The actual sequence of events was: Casement telegraphed on 8 May 1903; ‘Leaving for interior end May’; the Foreign Office replied that he should remain in Boma; after the House of Commons debate on 20 May the Foreign Office telegraphed that he should begin his trip to the interior as soon as possible; Casement received this order on 4 June and departed the next day (F.O. 10/804).Google Scholar

32 Casement to Lansdowne, 9 Oct. 1905, F.O. 10/815; see also Casement to Morel, 27 June 1904, Morel papers;Google ScholarSingleton-Gates, Peter and Girodias, Maurice, The Black Diaries of Roger Casement (New York, 1959), pp. 73–4;Google Scholar and Thompson, Brooks, ‘A Letter of Roger Casement in the Sanford Collection’, English Historical Review, LXXVII, 01. 1962, pp. 98102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Casement to Morel, 15 March 1905, Morel papers.Google Scholar

34 Casement wrote these lines to the Foreign Office in justification of his bluntly stated personal letter to the Governor-General of the Congo State in 1904; see below, p. 106. Cf. Phipps to Lansdowne, No. 71 Africa, 20 Sept. 1902, F.O. 10/773: ‘Mr Casement's persistent animadversion on everything connected with the Congolese administrative methods are the more striking to me inasmuch as I found him, on the occasion of his interview with His Majesty some eighteen months ago, deeply impressed by the enlightened views entertained by King Leopold, who had urged him not to conceal whatever conclusions he might arrive at upon his arrival on the spot.'Google Scholar

35 Ward to Morel, 25 Aug. 1903, Morel papers.Google Scholar

36 Unpublished history of the Congo Reform Association, Morel papers.Google Scholar

38 Casement to Lansdowne, No. 34 Africa, 15–16 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

39 Casement to Farnall, private, 28 May 1903, F.O. 10/804.Google Scholar

40 Gosselin's minute on Casement to Gosselin, private, 16 May 1902, F.O. 10/773.Google Scholar

41 Casement to Farnall, private, 28 May 1903, F.O. 10/804. The theme of surveillance by the Congo authorities runs through Casement's despatches. Reporting the results of his journey to the interior, Casement wrote: ‘I was being “shadowed” wherever I went, and had I continued to seek to find out the truth by personal contact with the natives themselves the authorities would have intervened, under one pretext or another, to prevent my continuing in that course.’ Casement to Lansdowne, No. 38 Africa, very confid., 30 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/806.Google Scholar

42 Casement to Lansdowne, No. 28 Africa, 20 July 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

44 ‘Mr Casement should be liberally treated in this matter.… It is essential that [he] … should be able to move about freely and the less he is bound to use government boats the better his chance of seeing what is the true state of the country.' Farnall's minute on Casement's No. 28 Africa.Google Scholar

45 Africa No. I (1904).Google Scholar

46 Gwynn, Denis, Traitor or Patriot? (New York, 1931);Google ScholarParmiter, Geoffrey de C., Roger Casement (London, 1936);Google Scholar more recent material in the Public Record Office and the Morel papers has been used by MacColl, René, Roger Casement (London, 1956);Google ScholarCostigan's, GiovanniThe Treason of Sir Roger Casement’, American Historical Review, LX (01. 1955),Google Scholar and Broeker's, GalenRoger Casement: Background to Treason’, Journal of Modern History, XXIX (09. 1957) are scholarly efforts to trace and explain the causes of Casement's treason.Google Scholar

47 Phipps to Villiers, private, 16 April 1905, F.O. 10/813.Google Scholar

48 Casement to Farnall, private, 5 Aug. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

50 Casement to Lansdowne, No. Africa, confid., 6 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

51 One of the main difficulties is a gap in the evidence: Casement's No. 35 Africa was written on 5 Aug.; No. 32 Africa, confid. on Sept.Google Scholar

52 Casement to Farnall, 20 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/808.Google Scholar

53 Casement to Governor-General of the Congo State, 12 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/806.Google Scholar

54 Casement to Lansdowne, No. 38 Africa, very confid., 30 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/806.Google Scholar

55 Casement to Lansdowne, No. 34 Africa, 15–16 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

56 See above, note 45.Google Scholar

57 Phipps to Farnall, private, 26 Nov. 1903, F.O. 10/806.Google Scholar

58 Casement to Governor-General, 12 Sept. 1903.Google Scholar

59 Cf. ‘I do not think that the Congo Government will demand Mr Casement's recall on account of this letter and if they do they will make their position worse than it now is.’ Farnall's minute of 2 Nov. 1903, F.O. 10/806.Google Scholar

60 Casement to Lansdowne, tel., 5 Oct. 1903, F.O. 10/806.Google Scholar

61 Casement to Lansdowne, No. Africa, 15–6 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

63 Casement to Lansdowne, tel., 1 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805: ‘I ought to place facts before you before submitting these to any partial and pretended local investigation.’Google Scholar

64 Casement to Lansdowne, No. 33 Africa, very confid., 30 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/806Google Scholar

65 Clarke's minute of 23 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

66 Assistant Under-Secretary.Google Scholar

67 Campbell's minute of 18 Oct. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

68 Singleton-Gates, Black Diaries, p. 179.Google Scholar

69 See Morell to Duke, 17 Sept. 1903, Duke papers.Google Scholar

70 13Nov. 1903.Google Scholar

71 Clarke's minute of 19 Sept. 1904, F.O. 10/811. Jones was a director of the Elder Dempster shipping lines, whose steamers plied between Antwerp and the Congo under contract with the Congo Government. On 9 and 20 Dec. 1903.Google Scholar

72 On 9 and 20 Dec. 1903.Google Scholar

73 See Villiers's memoranda of 10 Dec. 1903, F.O. 10/806 and 21 Dec. 1903, F.O. 10/807; cf. Casement to Fox Bourne, private and confid., 1 Oct. 1904, papers of the Aborigines Protection Society, Rhodes House, Oxford; and Slade, English-Speaking Missions, pp. 287–8.Google Scholar

74 Lansdowne's minute on Villiers's memorandum of 10 Dec.Google Scholar

75 Singleton-Gates, Black Diaries, p. 183.Google Scholar

76 From the unpublished history of the Congo Reform Association, Morel papers.Google Scholar

77 Farnall's minute of 22 Dec. 1903, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

78 Villiers's minutes of 28 Dec. 1903, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

79 From the unpublished history of the Congo Reform Association, Morel papers.Google Scholar

80 Salisbury to Lansdowne, 26 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

82 Villiers's memorandum of 21 Dec. 1903, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

83 Pearson's memorandum of 21 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807; Broeker, ‘Roger Casement’, 239.Google Scholar

84 Lansdowne's minute of [?] 28 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

85 Except the names of the European Congo officials: ‘It has been a pain to me all the way through to have to refer to these poor men by name.’ Casement to Farnall, 4 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

86 Farnall's memorandum of 13 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

87 Casement to F.O., tel., 7 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

88 Percy's minute on Villiers to Percy, 21 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

89 Casement to Fox Bourne, 25 Jan. 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

90 Villiers to Casement, tel., 5 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

91 Casement to Farnall, 11 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/808.Google Scholar

93 Salisbury's memorandum of 26 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

94 Lansdowne's minute of [?]28 Jan. 1904, F.O. 10/807: ‘This course has its disadvantages, but the publication of the names of the natives would certainly be criticized adversely. …Google Scholar

95 ‘How weak this continuous twisting of letters is!' Casement to Farnall, 20 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/808. The following telegram from the British Minister in Brussels with Lansdowne's minute explains the final timing of the publication date: ‘Please manage to prevent issue of report by Casement until after 10th instant, date on which I must unavoidably encounter King of the Belgians. The publication will inevitably put me in an awkward position at court.’ (Phipps to Barrington, private tel., 5 Feb. 1904 F.O. 10/807); Lansdowne: ‘I think we should postpone laying the Blue Book until the 11th so as to make quite sure that the King receives his copy before the contents get out here.’ (Lansdowne's minute on Phipps's telegram.)Google Scholar

96 Casement to Farnall, 20 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/808. Consistency was not one of Casement's virtues. Within one month he completely reversed his views on the point on which he threatened to resign, urging that the names of his witnesses should not be given to the Commission of Inquiry because of the danger of vengeance. See Villiers to Lansdowne, 53 April 1904, F.O. 10/808.Google Scholar

97 Casement to Morel, 55 March 1905, Morel papers.Google Scholar

98 Casement to Morel, 2 Feb. 1905, Morel papers; Costigan, ‘The Treason of Sir Roger Casement’, p. 287.Google Scholar

99 Casement to Morel, 52 April 5905, Morel papers.Google Scholar

100 Casement to Morel, private and confid., 13 Feb. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

101 Phipps to Lansdowne, No. 25 Africa, confid., 27 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/773.Google Scholar

102 Phipps to Farnall, private, 14 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/807.Google Scholar

103 Phipps to Villiers, private, 12 June, F.O. 10/810.Google Scholar

104 See Phipps to Lansdowne, No. 9 Africa, 12 Feb. 1904, F.O. 10/808.Google Scholar

105 Lansdowne's private secretary.Google Scholar

106 Phipps to Lansdowne, No. 31 Africa (changed to Phipps to Villiers, private), 16 April 1905, F.O. 10/813.Google Scholar

107 Phipps to Villiers, private, 24 April 1905, F.O. 10/813.Google Scholar

108 Casement to Morel, ? April, 1905, Morel papers.Google Scholar

109 St James Budget, 28 Oct. 1910.Google Scholar

110 Unpublished history of the Congo Reform Association, Morel papers.Google Scholar

111 See Cocks, F. Seymour, Morel, E. D.: the Man and His Work (London, 1920).Google Scholar

112 Morel called Casement ‘Tiger’, and their mutual letters often began with the salutation ‘Dear Bulldog’ or ‘Dear Tiger’.Google Scholar

113 Casement to Dilke, private, 1 Jan. 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

114 Unpublished C.R.A. history.Google Scholar

115 Casement to Fox Bourne, 25 Jan. 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

116 Unpublished history of the C.R.A.Google Scholar

117 Dilke to Morel, private, 28 Jan. 1904 (copy), A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

118 Dilke to Casement, 12 Feb. 1904 (copy), A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

119 Ibid.

120 In The British Case in the French Congo (London, 1903).Google Scholar

121 Fox Bourne to Morel, 1 Feb. 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

122 Casement to Fox Bourne, private and confid., 12 Feb. 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

123 Morel to Fox Bourne, 30 Jan. 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

124 Morel to Dilke, tel., 1 Feb. 1904 A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

125 Morel to Fox Bourne, 7 March 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

126 Casement to Morel, tel., 1 Feb. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

127 Casement to Morel, private and confid., 13 Feb. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

128 Ibid.

129 Ibid.

130 Casement to Morel, 9 March 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

131 Casement to Morel, 24 March 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

132 Fox Bourne to Morel, 10 March 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

133 Casement to Dilke, private, 4 May 1904, A.P.S. papers.Google Scholar

134 Casement to Morel, 8 Sept. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

135 Morning Post, 19 July 1904.Google Scholar

136 Casement to Morel, 8 Aug. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

137 Casement to Morel, 15 March 1905, Morel papers.Google Scholar

138 Ibid.

139 ‘It is obvious that we Cannot enter the arena with these people of whose misrepresentations Mr Casement complains [in reference to the articles appearing in the Catholic Herald]. … I do not think we can do more than tell Mr Casement we are much obliged for his communications which will certainly provide us with ample material for reply should an official representation ever be addressed to us. …’ Clarke's minute on Casement to Lansdowne, 9 Oct. 1905, F.O. 10/815, initialled by Campbell, Percy and Lansdowne.Google Scholar

140 ‘… a deserved tribute of respect to an eminent British civil servant. … Mr Casement had an exceedingly difficult task. … That gentleman has been the object of many unjust attacks. …’ The Times, 4 July 1906.Google Scholar

141 Casement to Morel, 24 Jan. 1906, Morel papers.Google Scholar

142 See Broeker, ‘Roger Casement’.Google Scholar

143 Casement to Morel, private, 16 July 1906, Morel papers.Google Scholar

144 Casement to Morel, 17 July 1906, Morel papers.Google Scholar

145 Casement to Morel, 4 Aug. 1906, Morel papers.Google Scholar

146 Casement to Morel, 13 June 1912, Morel papers.Google Scholar

147 Casement to Morel, 13 June 1912, Morel papers.Google Scholar

148 Unpublished history of the C.R.A., Morel papers.Google Scholar

149 See Clarke's minute on Casement's telegram of 15 Sept. 1903, F.O. 10/805.Google Scholar

150 Casement to Morel, 4 Jan. 1907, Morel papers.Google Scholar

151 Casement to Morel, 14 Dec. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

152 Casement to Morel, 15 Dec. 1904, Morel papers.Google Scholar

153 Casement to Morel, 21 Aug. 1906, Morel papers.Google Scholar