Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:38:40.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choice of Law in Torts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Amos Shapira
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legislation
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 557 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See generally: Shapira, Amos, The Interest Approach to Choice of Law (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 [1969] 2 All E.R. 1085. See Shapira, , “A Transatlantic Inspiration: the ‘Proper Law of the Tort’ Doctrine” (1970) 33 Mod. L.R. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Israeli tort law will apply, as a matter of course, in every case of a tort committed in Israel. See clause 3 of the Civil Wrongs Ordinance, 1944 (Official Gazette Supp. No. 1, 129): “The matters in this Ordinance hereinafter enumerated shall be civil wrongs, and … any person who suffers any injury or damage by reason of any civil wrong committed in Palestine shall be entitled … to the remedies hereinafter specified …”

4 See supra.

5 See infra.