Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:35:20.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEVER ENDING STORY: SOME NEWS ABOUT THE GANG FROM URUK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Radosław Tarasewicz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies a new record (FLP 1596) relating to a criminal gang that operated in Uruk in the fourteenth year of Nabonidus. It examines the form of the record and its unusual terminology. Above all, however, it seeks to relate an episode described in FLP 1596 to the broader history of this gang's activities presented in 2014 by M. Sandowicz.

جامعة آدم ميكيفيتش في بوزنان

الملخص

يتعلق بعصابة إجرامية عملت في أوروك في السنة الرابعة عشرة من حكم نابونيدوس . (FLP 1596) تدرس هذه الورقة سجلا جديداً يفحص شكل السجل ومصطلحاته غير العادية. قبل كل شيء ، ومع ذلك ، فهي تسعى إلى ربط صيغة السجل وتعابيره غير الإعتيادية في في عام 2014. M. Sandowicz ساندويتش بالتاريخ الأوسع لأنشطة هذه العصابة التي قدمها م . FLP 1596

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 84 , December 2022 , pp. 231 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaulieu, P.-A. 1989. The Reign of Nabonidus King of Babylon 556-539 B.C. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boddy, K. 2021. The Composition and Tradition of Erimḫuš. CM 52. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassow, E. von 1999. “Introducing the Witnesses in Neo-Babylonian Documents” in Chazan, R., Hallo, W. W., and Schiffman, L. H. (eds.), Ki Baruch Hu: Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Judaic Studies in Honor of Baruch A. Levine. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, M. 1970. Die Aramäer Südbabyloniens in der Sargonidenzeit (700-648). AOAT 7. Kevelaer and Neukirchen-Vluyn: Butzon und Bercker.Google Scholar
Gombert, B. 2018. L'armée en Babylonie du VIème au IVème siècle av. n.è. PhD Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Hackl, J. 2021. Late Babylonian. In Vita, J.-P. (ed.), History of the Akkadian Language. Vol. 1: Linguistic Background and Early Periods. Vol. 2: The Second and First Millennia BCE. Afterlife. Handbook of Oriental Studies 152. Leiden-Chicago: Brill, pp. 1431–1458.Google Scholar
Kümmel, H. M. 1979. Familie, Beruf und Amt im spätbabylonischen Uruk. Prosopographische Untersuchungen zu Berufsgruppen des 6. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. In Uruk. Berlin: Mann.Google Scholar
Levavi, Y. 2018. Administrative Epistolography in the Formative Phase of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. DUBSAR 3. Münster: Zaphon-Verlag.Google Scholar
Magdalene, F. R., Wunsch, C. and Wells, B. 2019. Fault, Responsibility, and Administrative Law in Late Babylonian Legal Texts. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Müller, G. G. W. and Pirngruber, R. 2019. “Identifying Cuneiform Handwritings: a Case Study from the Late Babylonian Eanna Archive from Uruk” in Devecchi, E., Mynářová, J. and Müller, G. G. W. (eds.), Current Research in Cuneiform Palaeography 2. Gladbeck: PeWe Verlag, pp. 177–209.Google Scholar
Sandowicz, M. 2014. “Nabonidus and Forty Thieves of Uruk: Criminal Investigation in Neo-Babylonian Eanna”. Iraq 76: 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassmannshausen, L. 1995. Funktion und Stellung der Herolde (nigir/nāgiru) im alten Orient. Baghdader Mitteilungen 26: 85–194.Google Scholar
Wallenfels, R. 1998. Seleucid Archival Texts in the Harvard Semitic Museum. CM 12. Leiden and Boston: Brill).Google Scholar
Wells, B. 2009. “Conditional Verdicts in Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian Legal Texts” in Achenbach, R. and Arneth, M. (eds.), Gerechtigkeit und Recht zu üben” (Gen 18,9): Studien zur altorientalischen und biblischen Rechtsgeschichte, zur Religionsgeschichte Israels und zur Religionssoziologie. BZAR 13. (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz): 34–44.Google Scholar