Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:09:33.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Witchcraft and war: The ritual fragment Ki 1904-10-9, 18 (BM 98989)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Daniel Schwemer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

War, and imminent battle in particular, put any Babylonian or Assyrian king, whose rule and security very much depended on successful campaigns, in a precarious situation. While careful military planning certainly helped to defeat one's enemies, victory in the end was determined by the gods. Before entering battle, oracles were consulted to make certain that the king's decisions had the gods' favour, and a number of other rituals could be performed to ensure that the gods supported the king's cause. These rituals — dubbed “war rituals” by modern scholarship — are not very well known, and the texts attributed to this group are a rather mixed set of royal rituals related to the king's campaign and to potential aggression by enemies. They include traditional Babylonian rituals to be performed before setting off on a military campaign or immediately before a major battle, as well as specifically Assyrian rituals for the same purpose. It is not suprising that two of these texts include the performance of divination rituals, while others focus on the binding of substitute figurines representing the enemies and also use figurines representing the king himself. In line with the general ideology of war, the rubrics of the rituals clearly indicate that the reason for the king's military action is the enemy's aggression against his land, and that the king himself only acts in defence of his own land's borders. It seems that all these texts, apart from the Assyrian rituals in the narrow sense, were assembled in a “series ‘battle’” (iškar tāḫāzi) that is mentioned in the famous letter of an Assyrian king demanding the collection of various scholarly texts from the Ezida and scholars' houses in Borsippa. The same text refers to rituals (or a ritual) “So that in Battle Arrows do not Come Near a Man” that are also known from the catalogue of exorcistic texts (KAR 44 //). Apparently they were not thought to be part of the iškar tāḫāzi; but in the letter the two text groups are named together within a longer list and they were certainly closely associated with each other. Special namburbi rituals could be performed on campaign to avert evil indicated by accidents of the king's chariot, but there is no reason to assume that they belonged to the iškar tāḫāzi too. Other namburbi rituals were used to protect the land's borders when an earthquake had signalled an imminent invasion of the enemy.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 69 , 2007 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abusch, T. 1984. Magical and Medical Texts: Further Joins and Duplicates, RA 78: 93–4.Google Scholar
Abusch, T. 1985. Dismissal by Authorities: Šuškunu and Related Matters, JCS 37: 91–100.Google Scholar
Abusch, T. 1987. Babylonian Witchcraft Literature (Brown Judaic Studies 132, Atlanta).Google Scholar
Ambos, C. 2004. Mesopotamische Baurituale aus dem 1. Jahrtausend (Dresden).Google Scholar
Borger, R. 1956. Die Inschriften Asarhaddons (AfO Beih. 9, Vienna).Google Scholar
Butler, S. A. L. 1998. Mesopotamian Conceptions of Dreams and Dream Rituals (AOAT 258, Münster).Google Scholar
Deller, K. 1992. Neuassyrische Rituale für den Einsatz der Götterstreitwagen, BaM 23: 341–6, pls. 67–9.Google Scholar
Ebeling, E. 1949. Beschwörungen gegen den Feind und den bösen Blick aus dem Zweistromlande, ArOr 17/1: 172–211.Google Scholar
Elat, M. 1982. Mesopotamische Kriegsrituale, BiOr 39: 5–25.Google Scholar
Farber, W. 1987. Rituale und Beschwörungen in akkadischer Sprache, in: TUAT 2/2 (Gütersloh), 212–81.Google Scholar
Foster, B. 2005. Before the Muses, An Anthology of Akkadian Literature (3rd edn, Bethesda).Google Scholar
Frame, G. and George, A. R. 2005. The Royal Libraries of Nineveh: New Evidence for King Ashurbanipal's Tablet Collecting, Iraq 67: 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, M. J. 2000. Incipits and Rubrics, in: Wisdom, Gods and Literature. Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert, ed. Finkel, I. L. and George, A. R. (Winona Lake), 225–58.Google Scholar
George, A. R. 2003. The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hämeen-Anttila, J. 2000. A Sketch of Neo-Assyrian Grammar (SAAS 13, Helsinki).Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, N. C. J. 1997. Review of W. von Soden, Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik, 3. Aufl., BiOr 54 (1997) 399–402.Google Scholar
Læssøe, J. 1955. Studies on the Assyrian Ritual and Series bit rimki (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1957–1958. An Incantation of the Maqlû Type, AfO 18: 288–99, pls. XI–XVI.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1997. Questions Addressed to the Babylonian Oracle, in: Oracles et prophéties dans l'antiquité, ed. Heintz, J.-G. (Paris), 85–98.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G. B. 2003. The Assyrian Expansion in the Zagros and the Local Ruling Elites, in: Continuity of Empire (?). Assyria, Media, Persia, ed. Lanfranchi, et al. (HANE/M 5, Padua), 79–118.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. 1994. Zukunftsbewältigung. Eine Untersuchung altorientalischen Denkens anhand der babylonischassyrischen Löserituale (Namburbi) (BaF 18, Mainz).Google Scholar
Mayer, W. R. 1988. Ein neues Königsritual gegen feindliche Bedrohung, OrNS 57: 145–64.Google Scholar
Mayer, W. R. 1990. Ein Ritual gegen Feindschaft im Museo Nazionale d'Arte Orientale zu Rom, OrNS 59: 14–33.Google Scholar
Mayer, W. R. 1993. Das Ritual BMS 12 mit dem Gebet “Marduk 5”, OrNS 62: 313–37.Google Scholar
Meier, G. 1937–1939. Kommentare aus dem Archiv der Tempelschule in Assur, AfO 12: 237–46.Google Scholar
Prechel, D. 2003. Von Ugarit nach Uruk, in: Literatur, Politik und Recht. Festschrift für Claus Wilcke, ed. Sallaberger, W.et al. (OBC 14, Wiesbaden), 225–8.Google Scholar
Reiner, E. 1967. Another Volume of Sultantepe Tablets, JNES 26: 177–200.Google Scholar
Schwemer, D. in press. Rituale und Beschwörungen gegen Schadenzauber (Keilschrifttexte aus Assur literarischen Inhalts 2, in WVDOG).Google Scholar
Schwemer, D. forthcoming. Abwehrzauber und Behexung. Studien zum Schadenzauberglauben im alten Mesopotamien (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2007).Google Scholar
Scurlock, J. A. 1989–1990. Was There a “Love-hungry” Ēntu-priestess Named Eṭirtum?, AfO 36–7: 107–12.Google Scholar
Scurlock, J. A. 2005. Magico-Medical Means of Treating Ghost-Induced Illnesses in Ancient Mesopotamia (AMD 3, Leiden – Boston).Google Scholar
Thomsen, M.-L. 1987. Zauberdiagnose und Schwarze Magie in Mesopotamien (CNIP 2, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F. A. M. 1992. Mesopotamian Protective Spirits. The Ritual Texts (CM 1, Groningen).Google Scholar
Zgoll, A. 2003. Die Kunst des Betens. Form und Funktion, Theologie und Psyehagogik in babylonisch-assyrischen Handerhebungsgebeten an Ištar (AOAT 308, Münster).Google Scholar