Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:38:31.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“A People Forgotten by History”: Soviet Studies of the Kurds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michiel Leezenberg
Michiel Leezenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy of the University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Russian/Soviet experience raises complex general questions concerning orientalism, conceptual hegemony, and the politics of (post-)colonial knowledge. Russia was not an empire in Said's sense, and drew much of its orientalist categories from non-imperialist German sources; the Soviet Union was explicitly anti-imperialist, and was dedicated to the emancipation of subaltern classes and nationalities. Yet Soviet orientalism in part reproduced hegemonic categories of “bourgeois” knowledge, notably concerning language and national identity. This becomes especially clear in the case of Soviet studies of Kurdish, a language subaltern with respect to Persian, Arabic, and, increasingly, Turkish. In the 1920s and early 1930s, native scholars like Erebê Shemo, Qanatê Kurdo, and Heciyê Cindî pioneered the creation of both an alphabet and a literature in Kurdish and of scholarly linguistic studies. Their work was shaped (and encouraged) by Nikolaj Marr's rejection of the idea of genetic links between Indo-Persian languages, and of the reification of “national characters.” Marr's “japhetic” linguistics dovetailed with Stalin's nationality policies in the 1920s and 1930s; it is rightly rejected as unscientific, but it did have positive emancipatory effects. It criticized ethnocentric and racist assumptions in contemporary Indo-European linguistics, and emphasized the value of spoken subaltern vernaculars like Ossetian and Kurdish against hegemonic written languages like Sanskrit and Persian. It also had the paradoxical effect of both countering bourgeois nationalism and encouraging national consciousness. The article concludes with a discussion of how the Soviet experience may affect our view of the Gramscian concept of hegemony and of the linguistic turn in later postcolonial studies.

Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 5: Russian Orientalism to Soviet Iranology: The Persian-speaking World and its History through Russian Eyes , September 2015 , pp. 747 - 767
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeghian, Manouk. Der armenische Volksglaube. Leipzig: Druck von W. Drugulin, 1899.Google Scholar
Abovian, Khatchatur. “Die Kurden und Jesiden.” Abovian archives, no. 44. Reprinted in Acta Kurdica 1 (1994): 181–206.Google Scholar
Abovian, Khatchatur. “Ein Blick über den Ursprung, Volkstümlichkeit, Sprache, Sitten und Gebräuche der Kurden.” Abovian archives, no. 43.Google Scholar
Abovian, Khatchatur. Ëntir Erker [Selected Works]. J. Yerevan: Petakan Hratarakchʻutyun’, 1958.Google Scholar
Allison, Christine. “Kurdish Autobiography, Memoir, and Novel: Ereb Shemo and His Successors.” Studies on Persianate Societies 2 (2005): 97–118.Google Scholar
Bennigsen, Alexandre. “Les kurdes et la kurdologie en Union Soviétique.” Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique 1–3 (1960): 513–530.Google Scholar
Cewarî, Firîda Hecî. Heciyê Cindî: Jiyan û kar. Dityarbakir: LÎS, 2008.Google Scholar
Cindî, Heciyê. Nivîsarkarê kurmanca, efrandina duya. Yerevan: Nesra Hukumetê, 1934.Google Scholar
Cindî, Hecîyê. Folklora Kurmancîê. Yerevan: Aipetrat, 1957.Google Scholar
Cindî, Hecîyê, and Evdal, Emînê. Folklora kurmanca. Yerevan: Neshra Hukumeta Ermenistana Shewre, 1936. Reprint in Latin characters Istanbul: Avesta, 2007.Google Scholar
Conquest, Robert. The Nation Killers. London: MacMillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Dabashi, Hamid. The World of Persian Literary Humanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der Melkonian-Minassian, Chaké. L’épopée populaire arménienne David de Sassoun. Montréal: Presses de l'université de Québec, 1972.Google Scholar
Egiazarov, S. A. Kratkij etnograficeskij ocerk kurdov Erivanskoj gubernii. Zapiski Kavk. otdela imperatorskogo russkogo geogr. obsce-stva, vol. 12 (1891), Tiflis.Google Scholar
Feydit, Frédéric. David de Sassoun. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Gourgouris, Stathis. Dream Nation: Enlightenment, Colonization, and the Institution of Modern Greece. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kilbourne Matossian, Mary. The Impact of Soviet Policies in Armenia. Leiden: Brill, 1962.Google Scholar
Kurdoev, Q. “Kritika oshibochnykh vzgliadov na kurdskii yazyk.” Kratkie soobscheniia Instituta vostokovedeniia XII (1955), 43–61.Google Scholar
L'Arménie aujourd'hui 4–6 (1988): 20–24. Accessed November 26, 2012. http://www.globalarmenianheritage-adic.fr/fr/8environnements/0caucasie/kurdes_4armenie1.htmGoogle Scholar
Leezenberg, Michiel. “Soviet Kurdology and Kurdish Orientalism.” In The Heritage of Soviet Oriental Studies, edited by Kemper, M. and Conemann, S., 86–102. London: Routledge 2011.Google Scholar
Leezenberg, Michiel. “Soviet Orientalism and Subaltern Linguistics: The Rise and Fall of Marr's Japhetic Theory.” In The Making of the Humanities III, edited by Bod, R., Maat, J., & Weststeijn, Th., 97–112. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leezenberg, Michiel. “Between Islamic Learning and Philological Nationalism: Mela Mahmûdê Bayazîdî’s Auto-Ethnography of the Kurds” (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. “O prave natsii na samoopredelenie.” Prosveshcheniye 4, 5 and 6 (1914) English translation: Lenin, V .I. “On the Right of Nations to Self-determination.” In Collected Works. vol. 20, 393–454. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1972. Also available at http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/Google Scholar
Lescot, Roger. Textes kurdes, II: Mamé Alan. Paris: Collection de texts orientaux, 1942.Google Scholar
Marr, Nikolaj. “Yesho o slove Çelebi. K voprosy o kul'turnom znatsenii kurdskoii narodnosti b istorii Perednej Asii.” Zapiski Vostočnago otdělenija Imperatorskago russkago archeologičeskago obščestva XX (1911): 99–151.Google Scholar
Marr, Nikolaj. Izbrannye Raboty [Selected Works], vol. V. Moscow: Ogiz, 1937.Google Scholar
Nekrich, Aleksandr. The Punished Peoples The Deportation and Fate of Soviet Minorities at the End of the Second World War. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Nichanian, Marc. Le deuil de la philologie (Entre l'art et le témoignage). vol. II. Geneva: MētisPresses, 2007.Google Scholar
Nikitine, Basile. Les kurdes: Étude sociologique et historique. Paris: Imprimérie nationale, 1956.Google Scholar
Orbeli, I. A. “Vvedenie.” In Pamyatniki epokhi Rustaveli, 1–21. Leningrad: Gosudarstvennyj Ermitazh, 1938.Google Scholar
Pohl, J. Otto. Ethnic Cleansing in the USSR, 1937–1949. New York: Praeger, 1999.Google Scholar
E. Rödiger, Emil and Pott, August-Friedrich. “Kurdische Studien I.” Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 3 (1840): 1–63.Google Scholar
Rondot, Pierre. “Trois essais de latinization de l'alphabet kurde: Iraq, Syrie, U.R.S.S.” Bulletin d’études orientales V (1935): 1–31.Google Scholar
Rondot, Pierre. “L'adoption des caractères latins et le movement culturel chez les kurdes de l'U.R.S.S.” Revue des études islamiques I (1935): 87–96.Google Scholar
Samuelian, Thomas John. “The Search for a Marxist Linguistics in the Soviet Union, 1917–1950.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
Sebag Montefiore, Simon. The Court of the Red Czar. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2003.Google Scholar
Shemo, Ereb [Shamilov]. “Kurdish Writing and Literature” [in Armenian]. Hoy, no. 9 (1933).Google Scholar
Shemo, Erebê. Şivanê Kurmanca [The Kurdish shepherd]. Diyarbakir: Weşanxaneya LÎS, 2009.Google Scholar
Stalin, J. V. “Marksizm i' natsional'nyy vopros.” Prosveshcheniye 3–5 (March–May 1913). English translation “Marxism and the National Question” Accessed November 12, 2012. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1913/03.htmGoogle Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor. Looking toward Ararat: Armenia in Modern History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Thomas, Lawrence. The Linguistic Theories of N. Ja. Marr. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Tolz, Vera. Russia's Own Orient. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Türkyilmaz, Yektan. “Armenian Nationalist Literature on the Kurds.” Paper presented at the workshop “Islam, Europe, and the Secular-Religious Divide,” University of Amsterdam, December 2009.Google Scholar
Vasileva, E. I., ed. Saraf-nâme. vol. I. Moscow: Nauk, 1967.Google Scholar
Vil’čevskij, Oleg Ljudvigovič. “N. Ja. Marr i kurdovedenie.” Jazyk i Myslenie 8 (1937): 209–233.Google Scholar
Vil'cevskij, Oleg Ljudvigovič. “Pervaja v sessoyuznaja kurdovedçeskaja konferencija I problema literaturnogo jazyka kurdov S.S.S.R.” Jazyk i myslenie 6–7 (1936): 333–337.Google Scholar
Vil’čevskij, Oleg Ljudvigovič. Kurdy: vvedenie v ėtničeskuju istoriju kurdskogo naroda. Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR, 1961. (Kurdish translation: Vilcheviskj, O. L. [sic]. Kurd: Destpêka dîroka etnîkî ya gelê kurd. Diyarbakir: LÎS, 2008.)Google Scholar
Yeghiazaryan, Azat. Daredevils of Sasun: Poetics of an Epic. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda, 2008.Google Scholar