Article contents
The Development of a Literary Canon in Medieval Persian Chronicles: The Triumph of Etiquette
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Extract
Islamic chronicles have always been an important source, and in most cases the only source, for studying the history of the Middle East and Central Asia. Consequently, scholars have, as a rule, concentrated on the facts contained in them while overlooking their narrative styles. Moreover, the complexity of many chronicles has made it difficult for scholars to grasp their contents on the one hand while making it easy for them to be critical of these sources on the other.
However, a number of scholars have formulated a quite different approach to the language of medieval works. For example, I. Yu. Krachkovskii has concluded that it is necessary to consider the Quran not only a religious, philosophical, and legislative composition, but also a work of fiction. A. K. Arends has the same opinion of Bayhaqi's eleventh-/fifth-century chronicle, Tarikh-e Mas'udi.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 1984
References
Notes
1. This article is partly based on another article by the author, “Nekotorye svedeniia o “Tarikh-e Vassaf,” published in Obshchestvennye nauki v Uzbekistane, No. 8 (1978), pp. 44-47. In its present form, the article has profited from the valuable comments of Professor M. R. Waldman. The author would also like to acknowledge the help of Professor R. D. McChesney in preparing the article for publication. Other articles of a similar theme which this writer has published are: “Bir sevgi fodzhiasi,” Gulistan, No. 7 (1976); “Ob etiketnosti i realistichnosti v khronikakh Rashid-ad-dina i Dzhuveini,” Obshch. nauki v Uzbekistane, no. 10 (1979); “Ispol'zovanie astrologicheskikh predstavlenii v nekotorykh khronikakh epokhi Ulugbeka,” Iz Istorii Nauki X epokhi ulugbeka (Tashkent, 1979)Google Scholar; “O nekotorykh proiavleniiakh demokraticheskikh tendentsii v persoiazy nykh istoricheskikh istochnikakh XI v.,” obshch. nauki v Uzbekistane, no. 11 (1982); “Nekotorye cherty sotsial'no-politicheskikh vozzrenii v persoiazichnykh khronikakh XI - nachala XIV vv.”; Sotsial'no-utopicheskie idei v Srednei Azii (Tashkent, 1983).Google Scholar At present, the author's study, Transformatsiia mifologicheskikh i legendarnykh obrazov v persidskotadzhikskikh khronikakh XI-XV vv. is in press.
2. A. Krymskii, Istoriia Persii, eia literatury i dervisheskoi teosofii, v. III Moskva (1914-1917), pp. 42, 43, 53, 54; N. V. Pigulevskaia, A. IU. Iakubovskii, I. P. Petrushevskii et al., Istoriia Irana s drevneishikh vremen do kontsa XVIII v. (Leningrad, 1948), p. 212.Google Scholar
3. A. Krymskii, op. cit., pp. 43, 51.
4. V. Beliaev and P. Griaznevich, the preface to the Russian translation of the Quran by I. IU. Krachkovskii (Moskva, 1963), p. 9.
5. Bayhaqi, Abu'l-Fazl, Istoriia Mas'uda, trans, from Persian with notes and appendices by Arends, A. K., 2nd Ed. (Moskva, 1969), p. 46.Google Scholar
6. M. Bahar, “Stylistics,” Sabk-shenasi, v. 3 (Tehran, 1337), p. 259.
7. Ibid., pp. 100, 184, 193-5, 198.
8. Likhachev, D. S., Poetika Drevnerusskoi literatury, 2nd Ed. (Leningrad, 1971), pp. 121–2.Google Scholar
9. Ibid., p. 139.
10. Waldman, Marilyn Robinson, Toward a Theory of Historical Narrative: A Case Study in Perso-Islamicate Historiography (Columbus, 1980), p. 5.Google Scholar
11. Ibid., p. 7.
12. Hodgson, Marshall G. S., “Two Pre-Modern Muslim Historians: Pitfalls and Opportunities in Presenting Them to Moderns,” Towards World Community, ed. Nef, J., Academy of Arts and Science Publications, v. 5 (The Hague, 1968), p. 64.Google Scholar
13. Cantor, Norman F. and Schneider, Richard I., How to Study History (New York, 1967), p. 58.Google Scholar
14. M. Waldman, op. cit., p. 9.
15. Ibid., p. 10.
16. Eco, Umberto, A Theory of Semiotics (Bloomington, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Bertel's, E. E., Kratkaia Istoriia Literatur Irana, Afganistana i Turtsii, ed. Boldyrev, A. N. (Leningrad, 1971), p. 32.Google Scholar
18. Ibid.
19. M. R. Waldman, op. cit., p. 155 (Appendices).
20. E. A. Poliakova, “O nekotorykh proiavleniiakh…,” p. 48.
21. Tarikh-e Bayhaqi, ed. Dr. Ali Akbar Fayyaz (Mashhad, 1350), p. 229.Google Scholar
22. Waldman, M. R., “Semiotics and Historical Narrative,” Papers in Comparative Studies, v. 1 (1981), p. 176.Google Scholar
23. U. Eco, op. cit., p. 204.
24. M. R. Waldman, “Semiotics…,” p. 176.
25. Tarikh-e Bayhaqi, ed. Dr. Ali Akbar Fayyaz, p. 222.
26. Ibid., p. 164.
27. M. Bahar, op. cit., p. 53.
28. Juvayni, Ata Malik, The History of the World Conquerer, trans. Boyle, J. A. (Cambridge, Mass., 1948), v. 1, p. 5.Google Scholar
29. Ibid., p. 4.
30. M. R. Waldman, Toward a Theory…, p. 61.
31. Juvayni, op. cit., p. 5.
32. Ibid., p. 104.
33. Petrushevskii, I. P., Zemledeliia i agrarnye otnosheniia v Irane XIII - XIV vv. (Moskva-Leningrad, 1960), p. 16Google Scholar; N. V. Piguilevskaia et al., op. cit., p. 170.
34. Rashid-ad-din, Sbornik letopisei, v. III (Moskva-Leningrad, 1946), p. 135.
35. Sharaf al-din ‘Abd Allah “Vassaf,” Tarikh-e Vassaf (Bombay, 1241), p. 184.
36. Ibid., p. 273.
37. Ibid., p. 217.
38. Ibid., p. 184.
39. Ibid., p. 185.
40. Ibid.
41. Ali, Giiasaddin, Dnevnik pokhoda Timura v Indiiu (Moskva, 1958), p. 21Google Scholar; A manuscript, No. 1520/II, f.83b of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Uzbek SSR, Tashkent, was also used.
42. L. Massignon, “Les methodes de realisation artistique de peuples de l'Islam,” Opera Minora, v. 3 (Beirut, . 1963), pp. 9-28.
43. Arabskaia srednevekovaia kul'tura i literatura (Moskva, 1978), p. 10.Google Scholar
44. von Grunebaum, G. E., “Observations on City Panegyrics in Arabic Prose,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, v. 64 (1944), pp. 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5
- Cited by