Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:45:11.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Criteria for compulsory admission in some European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

A. Carballedo  and
M. Doyle
A. Carballedo
Affiliation:
Cheeverstown House, Dublin, Ireland, email [email protected]
M. Doyle
Affiliation:
St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Compulsory admission to mental health facilities is a controversial topic, as it impinges on personal liberty and the right to choose, and it carries the risk of abuse for political, social and other reasons (Gostin, 2000). However, involuntary admission can prevent harm to self and others, and assist people in attaining their right to health, which, due to their mental disorder, they are unable to manage voluntarily. Since the 1950s and 1960s, the delivery of mental health has shifted from a paternalistic emphasis on the need to treat those who are not able to look after themselves, to the rights of patients who have a mental illness. The Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness (‘the MI Principles’) adopted by the United Nations in 1991 play an important role in raising awareness about the human rights of people with mental health problems. They provide guidance on areas such as the procedures for involuntary admission to mental health facilities and standards of care (Knapp et al, 2007). Legal frameworks for involuntary placement of those who are mentally ill have been reformed in many European countries. Most regulate compulsory admission and treatment by special mental health laws. Only Greece, Spain, Italy and those member states of the European Union (EU) that joined in 2004 and 2007 have no separate laws (Dressing & Salize, 2004).

Type
Original Papers
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 68 - 71
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2011

References

Ali, S., Dearman, S. P. & McWilliam, C. (2007) Are Asians at greater risk of compulsory psychiatric admission than Caucasians in the acute general adult setting? Medicine, Science, and the Law, 47, 311–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelbaum, P. S. (1997) Almost a revolution: an international perspective on the law of involuntary commitment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25, 135–147.Google Scholar
Darsow-Schutte, K. I. & Muller, P. (2001) Number of hospitalizations according to German ‘PsychKG’ legislation has doubled in 10 years. Psychiatrische Praxis, 28, 226–229.Google Scholar
Dressing, H. & Salize, H. J. (2004) Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union member states. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 797–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gostin, L. O. (2000) Human rights of persons with mental disabilities. The European Convention on Human Rights. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 125–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, V. C., Berg, J. E., Smavik, R., et al (2011) Clinical differences between immigrants voluntarily and involuntarily admitted to acute psychiatric units: a 3-year prospective study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing (in press).Google Scholar
Kallert, T. W., Glockner, M., Onchev, G., et al (2005) The EUNOMIA project on coercion in psychiatry: study design and preliminary data. World Psychiatry, 4, 168–172.Google ScholarPubMed
Knapp, M., McDaid, D., Mossialos, E., et al (2007) Mental Health Policy and Practice. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Riecher-Rossler, A. & Rossler, W. (1993) Compulsory admission of psychiatric patients – an international comparison. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 87, 231–236.Google Scholar
Salize, H. J. & Dressing, H. (2004) Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, J. W., Holzer, C. E. 3rd, Ganju, V. K., et al (1990) Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: evidence from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area surveys. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 761–770.Google ScholarPubMed
Tolmac, J. & Hodes, M. (2004) Ethnic variation among adolescent psychiatric in-patients with psychotic disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 428–431.Google Scholar
Torrissen, T. (2007) Tvangsinnleggelser i en akuttpsykiatrisk post. [Involuntary admissions to an acute psychiatric ward.] Tidsskrift for den Norske legeforening, 127, 2086–2089.Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General (2003) Progress of efforts to ensure the full recognition and enjoyment of the human rights of persons with disabilities – report of the Secretary-General (A/58/181). Available at http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=148 (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.