Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T18:57:45.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States: Supreme Court Opinion in Republic of Argentina v. Weltover INC (U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; Commercial Activity of Bond Issuance)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Georges R. Delaume
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , September 1992 , pp. 1220 - 1229
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the Slip Opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court. The Introductory Note was prepared for International Legal Materials by Georges R. Delaume, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, and I.L.M. Corresponding Editor for International Arbitration.]

References

1 It is undisputed that both the Republic of Argentina and Banco Central are “foreign states” within the meaning of the FSIA. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1603(a),(b) (“[F]oreign state” includes certain “agenc[ies] or instrumentalit[ies] of a foreign state”).

2 Argentina concedes that this issue “is before the Court only as an aid in interpreting the direct effect requirement of the Act” and that “[w]hether there is a constitutional basis for personal jurisdiction over [Argentina] is not before the Court as an independent question.” Brief for Petitioners 36, n. 33.