No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Van Droogenbroeck Case
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Article 50 — Pecuniary and non — pecuniary loss — Legal fees and expenses
State responsibility — Damages (Measure of damages) — Grounds for awarding damages — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 50 — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss — Legal fees and expenses — Legal aid
The individual in international law — In general — Before international tribunals — European Court of Human Rights — Proceedings for just satisfaction in respect of breach of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Claim for legal fees and expenses made by lawyer not authorised to act for applicant — Whether admissible
The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Violation of right to review of lawfulness of detention established — Article 50 — Just satisfaction — Pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss — Loss caused by deprivation of liberty — Whether to be taken into account — Monetary satisfaction assessed on an equitable basis — Legal fees and expenses — Claim made by lawyer not authorized to act for applicant — Belgian proceedings — Proceedings before Commission and Court — Legal aid
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 1987