Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:52:51.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scheidt v. German Federal Republic.

Arbitral Commission on Property, Rights and Interests in Germany.  13 December 1957 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law — Sources of — General principles of international law, of justice, and of equity — Application by Arbitral Commission.

State responsibility — For wrongs unconnected with contractual obligations — Exhaustion of local remedies — Understanding between parties on suspension of further proceedings before municipal court — Whether bar to jurisdiction of Arbitral Commission.

Arbitration — In general — Law applied by arbitral tribunals — General principles of international law, of justice and of equity — Application by Arbitral Commission.

Arbitration — Procedure — Competence — Right of parties to direct access to the Commission — Depending on expiration of time — Understanding between the parties on suspension of further proceedings before municipal court until other cases decided by such court — Whether such understanding restricts right to proceed before Arbitral Commission — Jurisdiction of arbitral commission — Chapter Five, Article 7 (3), sentence 2, of Convention on the Settlement of Matters Arising out of the War and Occupation, 1952—1954.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)