Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:15:22.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re Rizzo and Others (No. 3).

Franco-Italian Conciliation Commission.  07 December 1955 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State Responsibility — In General — Legal Basis of.

State Responsibility — Absolute Responsibility and Responsibility Based on Fault — Responsibility for Loss or Damage Sustained by Sequestrated Property — Negligence of Sequestrator — Criteria of Responsibility — Extent of Liability.

Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and Rules of — Comparison with Wording of Earlier Clause in Same Treaty.

Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and Rules of — Intention of the Parties.

Arbitration — Procedure — Competence — Competence of Conciliation Commission Sitting as Collége arbitral.

Conciliation — Competence of Conciliation Commission Sitting as Collége arbitral.

War — Effects of Outbreak of — On Enemy Subjects with regard to Their Property — Sequestration of Enemy Property — Conservatory Nature of — Distinction between Administrative and Judicial Sequestration.

Peace Treaties — Performance of — Right of Victorious Party to Seize Property of Defeated Party — Exempted Property — Sequestrated Property of Nationals of Defeated Party — Responsibility for Negligence of Sequestrator — Criteria of Responsibility — Responsibility for Delay in Raising Sequestration — Implied Period of Grace.

State Responsibility — Wrongs Unconnected with Contractual Obligations — Acts and Omissions of State Organs and Officials — Responsibility for Acts of Judiciary — Basis and Nature of State Responsibility — Peace Treaties — Operation of — Right of Victorious Party to Seize Property of Defeated Party — Exempted Property — Sequestrated Property of Nationals of Defeated Party — Responsibility for Negligence of Sequestrator — Criteria of Responsibility — Responsibility for Delay in Raising Sequestration — Interpretation of Treaties — Principles and Rules of — Comparison with Wording of Earlier Clause in Same Treaty — Intention of the Parties — Conservatory Nature of Sequestration of Enemy Property.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)