Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:13:05.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Campbell and Fell Case

European Court of Human Rights.  28 June 1984 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Fair trial — Disciplinary proceedings against convicted prisoner — Penalty of loss of remission — Whether proceedings amounting to the determination of a criminal charge — Proceedings before prison board of visitors — Whether board an impartial and independent tribunal — Whether proceedings required to be held in public — Whether sentence required to be pronounced in public — Right to legal representation before board — Access to lawyer before hearings — Access to courts — Prisoners wishing to take civil proceedings against prison authorities — Requirement that complaint first be ventilated through internal prison procedures — Restrictions on access to lawyers — Respect for correspondence — Interference with prisoners' correspondence — Right to a remedy under domestic law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Articles 6, 8 and 13

International tribunals — European Court of Human Rights — Procedure — Plea that applicant had failed to exhaust local remedies — Plea not raised before European Commission of Human Rights — Whether respondent State estopped from raising plea before Court — Existence of certain remedies only becoming apparent as a result of decision of English court while proceedings before European Court of Human Rights pending — Whether Court bound by Commission's decision regarding non-exhaustion of local remedies — Nature of proceedings before Court — Whether Court entitled to take account of changes in law of respondent State effected after events which are the substance of the complaint had occurred

Claims — Exhaustion of local remedies — Availability of remedy — Existence of remedy required to be sufficiently certain before it can be regarded as available — Doubts concerning effectiveness of remedy — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 26

Damages — Human rights violations — Pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss — Whether findings that violations had occurred constitute sufficient satisfaction — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 50

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)