Article contents
The Modernization of Israeli Administration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
Extract
Israeli political, economic, and social achievements have apparently made Israel a developed nation. Social scientists customarily ignore its geographic setting in the developing world and study the country as a phenomenon of political, social and economic development. One aspect, however, is still problematic and controversial. This is the administrative. Israelis doubt the extent to which their governmental administration is developed, by which they mean the extent to which their administration is staffed by trained officials appointed on grounds of merit. While the forms of a modern government service exist, Israelis are skeptical of their substance, because of what they suspect to be widespread instances of inattention to the rules for appointment and promotion to civil service positions. Social scientists seem to have accepted the conventional wisdom of Israeli public opinion and they, too, have judged the Israeli civil service to be embryonic or stunted in development, largely because of political interference in appointments and advancement to senior positions. It is true that in every country the issue of which governmental offices should be political and which administrative is a problem. But this problem is exacerbated in Israel where, because of party politics, it is, ostensibly, one resolution which exists in law and another in fact.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974
References
page 295 note 1 Akzin, Benjamin and Dror, Yehezkel, Israel: High-Pressure Planning (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1966), p. 50.Google Scholar
page 295 note 2 Akzin, Benjamin, ‘The Structure of Government in Israel’, Public Administration in Israel and Abroad, vol.1 (1961), 7–15, p. 12.Google Scholar
page 296 note 1 Eisenstadt, S. N., Israeli Society (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967), p. 302.Google Scholar
page 296 note 2 Most of the information for this paper comes from the intensive interviews of the ninety-eight civil servants of grade 19 conducted in the offices of these officials in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa, Nazareth, and Lod between 15 June and 3 October 1968, or from Government of Israel, Civil Service Commission ‘Personnel Records of Government Employees: Data Pertinent to their Jobs and Careers in the Israel Civil Service’, Civil Service Archives, Jerusalem. Unless otherwise specified, the textual data has been derived from the two sources.Google Scholar
page 297 note 1 Fein, Leonard J., Politics in Israel (Boston: Little Brown, 1967), p. 78.Google Scholar
page 297 note 2 These laws restrict civil servants from running for a parliamentary seat or making campaign speeches for candidates.Google Scholar
page 398 note 1 Yanai, Natan, Qera be-Tsameret [Split at the Top] (Tel Aviv: Levin-Epstein, 1969), p. 105.Google Scholar
page 300 note 1 Caspi, Amnon, ‘Education and the Civil Service’, unpublished paper, Michigan State University, 1967, p. 7.Google Scholar
page 300 note 2 This figure was given to me by the statistician for the Israeli civil service commission.Google Scholar
page 300 note 3 Akzin, Benjamin and Dror, Yehezkel, op. cit. p. 12.Google Scholar
page 300 note 4 Interview with Shari, Reuven, former Civil Service Commissioner, reported in Ma'ariv, 8 July, 1968, p. 20.Google Scholar
page 300 note 5 Caspi, Amnon, op. cit. p. 4.Google Scholar
page 300 note 6 Ibid. p. 5.
page 301 note 1 Rosolio, David, Ten Years of the Civil Service in Israel (Jerusalem: Civil Service Commission, 1959), p. 13.Google Scholar
page 305 note 1 See Eisenstadt, S. N., op. cit., bibliography.Google Scholar
page 308 note 1 Government of Israel, Civil Service Commission, Taqanon Sherut ha-Mdinah [State Service Regulations]1959,; see section marked military.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by