Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:42:36.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Creationism in the Astronomy Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Philip J. Sakimoto
Philip J. Sakimoto*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Whitman College, Walla Walla, Washington 99362U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recently in the United States, a small but vocal group of citizens has been promoting a view known as “creationism,” the assertion that the universe and everything in it was created in six days by divine fiat as suggested by a literalist interpretation of the Christian Bible. In a now common variant, “scientific creationism” or “creation-science,” they assert further that this version of creation is proven true on “scientific” evidence alone, independent of any religious underpinnings. Legislation requiring the teaching of creation-science alongside of evolution in the public schools has been proposed in over twenty states; in Louisiana and Arkansas such legislation was passed, although it was later struck down by federal courts as a violation of the separation of church and state.

Type
8. Conceptions/Misconceptions
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 105: The Teaching of Astronomy , 1990 , pp. 243 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

1. Frye, Roland Mushat, “Creation Science Against the Religious Background,” in Is God a Creationist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science, ed. Frye, R.M. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1983), p. 1.Google Scholar
2. Palca, Joseph, “No Go for the Creationists,” Nature, 327, 645, 1987.Google Scholar
3. Hanson, Robert W., ed., Science and Creation: Geological, Theological, and Educational Perspectives (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986), Appendices A & B.Google Scholar
4. Reidinger, Paul, “Creationism in the Classroom,” Amer. Bar Assoc. J., 72, Dec. 1, 1986, p. 66.Google Scholar
5. Hartmann, William K., Astronomy: The Cosmic Journey, 4th ed, (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1987), p. 4.Google Scholar
6. Science (News and Comments section), 215, 143, 1982.Google Scholar
7. Nelkin, Dorothy, “Science, Rationality, and the Creation/Evolution Dispute,” in Science and Creation: Geological, Theological, and Educational Perspectives, ed. Hanson, R.W. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986), p. 33.Google Scholar
8. Weinberg, Stanley L., “Creationism in Iowa: Two Defense Strategies,” in Science and Creation: Geological, Theological, and Educational Perspectives, ed. Hanson, R.W. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986), p. 55.Google Scholar
9. Anderson, Bernhard W., ed., Creation in the Old Testament (Philadelphia:Fortress Press, 1984), especially for the articles by Hermann, Gunkel and Gerhard, von Rad.Google Scholar
10. Vawter, Bruce, “Creationism: Creative Misuse of the Bible,” in Is God a Cre- ationist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science, ed. Frye, R.M. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1983), p. 71.Google Scholar
11. Hyers, Conrad, “Biblical Literalism: Constricting the Cosmic Dance,” in Is God a Creationist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science, ed. Frye, R.M. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1983), p. 95.Google Scholar
12. Sarna, Nahum M., “Understanding Creation in Genesis,” in Is God a Creation- ist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science, ed. Frye, R.M. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1983), p. 155.Google Scholar
13. Anderson, Bernhard W., “The Earth is the Lord’s: An essay on the Biblical Doctrine of Creation,” in Is God a Creationist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science, ed. Frye, R.M. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1983), p. 176.Google Scholar
14. Miller, James B. and Fowler, Dean R., “What’s Wrong with the Creation/Evolution Controversy?,” CTNS Bulletin (Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, Berkeley, CA), v. 4, Autumn 1984.Google Scholar
15. Examples of such flawed arguments are readily apparent to any practicing scientist who reads those aspects of creation-science literature touching on areas with which he or she is familiar. See, for example, The Scientific Case for Creation, or Scientific Creationism, both by Morris, Henry M. and available from Creation Life Publishers, P.O. Box 15666, San Diego, CA 92115. The now-disavowed case of false data involved an alleged fossilized human footprint found next to a dinosaur footprint in a Texas riverbed. The human footprint turned out to be recently chiseled into the ground. I do not have References to this incident, and I would appreciate any documentation which readers can provide.Google Scholar
16. Scott, Eugenie and Cole, Henry, Quat. Rev. Biol., 60, 21, 1985;Google Scholar
quoted by Lewin, Roger, “Evidence for Scientific Creationism?,” Science, 228, 837, May 17, 1985.Google Scholar
17. Paul, Pope John II, “Science and Christianity,” in Is God a Creationist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science, ed. Frye, R.M. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1983), p. 141.Google Scholar
18. Barbour, Ian G., Issues in Science and Religion, (New York: Harper and Row, 1971).Google Scholar
19. McMullin, Ernan, ed., Creation and Evolution (Notre Dame: University of NotreDame Press, 1985).Google Scholar
20. See also any issue of Zygon: The Journal of Science and Religion, or the CTNS Bulletin (Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, Berkeley CA).Google Scholar