Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:21:29.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nature and Properties of the Chandler Motion and Mechanism of its Damping and Excitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J.M. Ferrándiz  and
Yu. V. Barkin
J.M. Ferrándiz
Affiliation:
Dept. Matemática Aplicada, University of Alicante, Spain
Yu. V. Barkin
Affiliation:
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The analytical studies of the Chandler motion of the Earth’s pole on the basis of the special approach to the problem, using the canonical and noncanonical equations in the Andoyer elastic variables (Barkin, et al. 1995; Barkin, 1996; in press) have been fulfilled. The Earth is considered as an isolated celestial body with the anelastic (in general case) external envelope (the mantle) and an invariant central part (the core).

The interpretation of the Chandler motion of the body, deformed by its own rotation, was given in the case of an elastic envelope. It was shown that the body rotates as a fictitious rigid body with different moments of inertia. The analytical solution of the problem let us explain the next properties of the motion of the deformable bodies: 1) observed period of the Earth’s polar motion; 2) ellipticity of the pole trajectory and difference of the eccentricities of the Chandler and Euler motions; 3) nonuniform velocity of the counter-clockwise polar motion along the Chandler ellipse; 4) orientation of this ellipse (its minor axis is located in the meridian plane, at 14.5 W degrees).

The influence of the dissipation on the damping of the Chandler polar motion was studied. The analytical solution of the problem was obtained for the simplest treatment of the delay of the tides caused by the Earth’s rotation (Getino & Ferrándiz 1991; Kubo, 1991). This model explains the characteristic behaviour of the amplitude of the Chandler motion in the periods 1905–1920, 1943–1960 (Vondrák, & Cyril, 1966). The excitation of the Chandler motion can be explained by the upper and lower envelope displacements (Barkin, 1999) with Moon-Sun forced attraction with a period of 412 days, close to the Chandler period.

Type
Part 5. Chandler and Annual Polar Motion: Observations and Excitation
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 447 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Barkin, Yu.V., Ferrándiz, J.M & Getino, J. 1995, Abstracts Book. IAU Symposium N172. Dynamics, Ephemerides and Astrometry in the Solar System (Paris, France, July 3-8), p. 44.Google Scholar
Barkin, Yu.V. 1996, Proceedings of the International Conference “Earth Rotation. Reference Systems in Geodynamics and Solar System” (Warsaw, Poland, September 18-20, 1995). Journées 1995. SRC, PAS, Warsaw, Poland, 1996, pp. 83–86.Google Scholar
Barkin, Yu.V. 1998, Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions, 17, 179–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, Yu.V. 1999, Proceedings of Conference “Interaction in the Lithosphere-Hydrosphere-Atmosphere System”, Moscow, November 28-29, pp. 46–60. In RussianGoogle Scholar
Barkin, Yu.V. (in press), Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions.Google Scholar
IERS 1995, Annual Report, Int. Earth Rotation Service, Paris.Google Scholar
Ferrándiz, J.M. & Getino, J. 1993, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 57, 279–292.Google Scholar
Getino, J., & Ferrándiz, J.M. 1990, Celestial Mechanics, 49, 303–326.Google Scholar
Getino, J. & Ferrándiz, J.M. 1991, Celestial Mechanics, 52, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, Y. 1991, Celestial Mechanics, 50, 165–187.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J. & Cyril, R. 1996, Procedure of the International Conference “Earth Rotation reference Systems in Geodynamics and Solar System”. Warsaw, Poland, September 18-20, 1995. Journées 1995, SRC, PAS. Warsaw, Poland, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar