Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:23:07.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

As Bad as Things are for Radio Astronomy in the Protected Bands -- They are Worse for SETI!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jill Tarter*
Affiliation:
The SETI Institute, and Astronomy Department, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CAU.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

If the funding that has been requested in NASA’s FY89 budget is forthcoming, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) will inaugurate its microwave search program on Columbus Day, 1992. This systematic search for evidence of narrowband microwave signals generated by another technology will continue at several sites around the world until at least 1998. The search will be conducted in two modes: a sensitive targeted search of selected solar type stars covering 1 to 3 GHz, and an all sky survey that covers 1 to 10 GHz. This region of the spectrum is the quietest in terms of natural background noise from astrophysical sources and/or the terrestrial atmosphere, which is why it was chosen. Unfortunately, at the same time that terrestrial technology has enabled this systematic search, it also threatens to render the search all but impossible from the surface of the Earth. Terrestrial transmissions generated for an enormous number of different purposes will be the signals most frequently detected by the SETI systems! This paper describes the design decisions and observing plans that the SETI Program is now making in order to have a chance of successfully “listening” throujgh this heavily utilized portion of the spectrum. We do not yet know precisely how heroic our efforts to discriminate against and identify RFI may have to be, but we have been accumulating observational experience and data that demonstrate convincingly that the situation is rapidly growing worse. Because of the real-time nature of the signal processing being planned, SETI systems will provide an excellent opportunity to monitor, and perhaps identify, sources of narrowband interference within the radio astronomy bands at each site where observations are being conducted.

Type
Radio Frequency Interference
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1991

References

Basler, R. P., Johnson, G. L. and Vondrak, R. R.Parametric Study of Interstellar Search Systems,” NASA contract report NAS2-8938, August 1976.Google Scholar
Duluk, J. F., Linscott, I. R., Peterson, A. M., Burr, J., Ekroot, B. and Twicken, J.VLSI Processors for Signal Detection in SETI,” paper IAA-86-489 presented at 1986 IAF Congress in Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar
Linscott, I. R., Chen, K. C. and Peterson, A. M.The Multi-Channel Analyzer,” paper presented at 1985 International Union of Radio Science Symposium, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. A.The Response of a Radio Astronomy Synthesis Array to Interfering Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1982 AP-30, pp.450456.Google Scholar
Welch, W. J. The Filter Characteristics of a Multiplying Interferometer,” paper IAA-86-486 presented at the 1986 IAF Congress in Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar