Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:22:14.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorhexidine Is Not the Main Active Ingredient in Skin Antiseptics That Reduce Blood Culture Contamination Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Matthias Maiwald ,
Andreas F. Widmer  and
Manfred L. Rotter
Matthias Maiwald*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
Andreas F. Widmer
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University of Basel Hospitals, Basel, Switzerland
Manfred L. Rotter
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 31 , Issue 10 , October 2010 , pp. 1095 - 1096
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

References

1.Marlowe, L, Mistry, RD, Coffin, S, et al.Blood culture contamination rates after skin antisepsis with Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine in a pediatric emergency department. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:171–176.Google Scholar
2.Gröschel, DHM, Pruett, TL. Surgical antisepsis. In: Block, SS, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1991:642–654.Google Scholar
3.Rotter, ML. Hand washing, hand disinfection, and skin disinfection. In: Wenzel, RP, ed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1997:691–709.Google Scholar
4.Rotter, ML. Hand washing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004:1727–1746.Google Scholar
5.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR; Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–278.Google Scholar
6.World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
7.Reichel, M, Heisig, P, Kohlmann, T, Kampf, G. Alcohols for skin antisepsis at clinically relevant skin sites. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:4778–4782.Google Scholar
8.Darouiche, RO, Wall, MJ Jr, Itani, KM, et al.Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:18–26.Google Scholar
9.Chaiyakunapruk, N, Veenstra, DL, Lipsky, BA, Saint, S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a metaanalysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:792–801.Google Scholar